98-0209
98-0209
Page 1U.S. Department of Transportation 400 Seventh Street, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20590 Research and Special Programs Administration Ref. No. 98-0209 SEP 29 1998 Mr. William Oister 2000 Market Street Elf Atochem North America, Inc. Philadelphia, PA 19103-3222 Dear Mr. Oister: This is in response to your letter requesting clarification of 49 CFR 177.834 (h). Specifically, you ask whether an IM portable tank on a chassis which is not connected to a power unit is subject to the Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR; 49 CFR, Parts 171-180). As discussed in the preamble of the notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) under Docket RSPA-97-2905 (HM-166Y) (copy enclosed), it is this Office's position that highway transportation ceases when the IM portable tank has been removed from the trailer and placed on the consignee's premises, or the motive power has been removed from the trailer and disconnected from the premises. Accordingly, under these conditions, the IM portable tank would not be subject to the HMR. Please contact us if we may be of further assistance. Sincerely, Hattie I. Mitchell, Chief Regulatory Review and Reinvention Office of Hazardous Materials Standards#
Page 2elf, atochem юo Market Stre 1 Atochem North America, Ir Philadelphia, PA 19103-322 ATO Tel.: 215.419.7000 manture §177.834 July 15, 1998 U.S. Department of Transportation RSPA 400 Seventh St., S.W. Washington, D.C. Attention: 20590-0001 Mr. E. Mazzullo, Director Office of Hazardous Material Standards [DHM-10] Re: HM-166Y; 8177.834 Dear Mr. Mazzullo: telephone conversations. This letter requests a written confirmation of information that DOT has provided during recent removed from a motor vehicle. The rule also added conditions [§177.834(o)] that applied to unloading the IMportable tanks while they remained on the transport vehicle. These conditions include that the 'tank meets the outlet requirements in Sec. §178.345-11'. With this as background and with our understanding that the majority of IM portable tanks in use today do not meet the requirements of §178.345-11, on 7/10/98 I called the DOT 'Hot Line' and spoke with "Mark'. The scenario was proposed that an IM portable tank mounted on a chassis is brought into one of our plants; the tank/chassis is then disconnected from the tractor. We questioned whether, within the context of §177.834(h), disconnecting the tank/chassis from the power unit constitutes removing the tank from the motor vehicle, and therefore, could the tank be unloaded while it was on the chassis, but not attached to the power unit. The answer we received was that if the power unit was not attached, the IM portable tank [on the chassis] is not in transportation. The message that we take from this is that if the power unit is not attached, the tank on the chassis would not be subject to any of DOT's hazardous material regulations. • *#
Page 3We are requesting confirmation that an IM portable tank on a chassis, but not connected to a power unit, is not subject to DOT's hazardous material regulations, and specifically that the following Sections of the regulations do not apply: §177.834(h) prohibition from discharging the contents of a container before the • $177.834(0) container is removed from the motor vehicle. requirements for unloading IM portable tanks • $177.834(i) attendance requirements. §171.15/.16 release reporting requirements. Thank you for your prompt response. Sincerely, William List William Oister Transportation Manager, Regulatory Compliance Elf Atochem North America, Inc. Phone: 215-419-7253 Fax: 215-419-5220 E-mail: woister@ato.com -#
Page 4CERTIFIED - elf atochem PRUE ATO Z 146 714 834 2000 Market Street Elf Atochem North America, Inc. FHILE FA HE! Philadelphia, PA 19103-3222 MAIL 6795214 FAME TEN. × 04 US Department of Transportation Mr. E. Mazzullo - Director RSPA 400 Seventh St., S.W. Washington, DC 20590-0001 E-16 20590-0001#
This material provides agency context. It does not replace binding regulatory text, and its legal effect depends on the underlying authority and facts.