PI-11-0014
PI-11-0014
Page 1U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration 1200 New Jersey Ave, S.E. Washington, D.C. 20590 MAR 17 201£ Mr. Robert V eneck Executive Director Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission 101 West Washington Street Suite 1500 East Indianapolis, IN 46204-3407 Dear Mr. Veneck: In a letter to the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) dated August 30, 2011, you asked for an interpretation of a master meter under 49 CFR Part 191. Based on the definition of a "master meter" as defined in 49 CFR § 191 .3, you believe that the pipeline downstream from the local distribution company (LDC) should be regulated by the Federal pipeline safety regulations because the apartment complex owners are operating natural gas distribution systems. You stated that the property in question includes approximately twenty buildings. each having five to seven residential units that are served by natural gas from the local distribution company (LDC). There is a meter, owned by the LDC. at the end of each of these buildings: the apartment owner's piping downstream from the meter goes back underground and around the back of the building to each unit. The piping for each tenant's individual unit proceeds to a riser where it enters the building for each individual ultimate customer, the tenant. There is a minimum of 12,293 feet of underground natural gas piping owned by the apartment complex owners that is located adjacent to and around the length of the twenty serviced buildings. Also, you stated that the apartment complex owners, and the Indiana Apartment Association, dispute your determination because there are not multiple buildings being served by a single meter. By the fact that there is a single meter per building. they insist that they are not, by definition, master meter operators. Therefore, you request a detem1ination by PHMSA regarding the status of the owners of this apartment complex whether they are considered natural gas operators and are subject to Federal and state pipeline safety regulations. Under 49 CFR § 191.3, a master meter system is defined as follows: Master Meter System means a pipeline system for distributing gas within, but not limited to, a definable area, such as a mobile home park, housing project, or apartment complex, where the operator purchases metered gas from an outside source for resale through a gas The Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration. Office of Pipeline Safety provides written clarifications of the Regulations ( 49 CFR Parts 190-199) in the form of interpretation letters. These letters reflect the agency's current application of the regulations to the specific facts presented by the person requesting the clarification. Interpretations do not create legally-enforceable rights or obligations and are provided to help the public understand how to comply with the regulations.#
Page 22 distribution pipeline system. The gas distribution pipeline system supplies the ultimate consumer who either purchases the gas directly through a meter or by other means, such as by rents; Also, under 49 CFR § 192.3, an operator is defined as follows: Operator means a person who engages in the transportation of gas. In this case, the apartment complex owners are operating the pipeline which provides gas to their tenants and, therefore, are engaged in the transportation of gas. The pipelines downstream of the master meter used to distribute the gas to the tenants are considered mains and service lines subject to the Federal pipeline safety regulations. We consider the mains and service lines downstream from the LDC master meter (whether or not there are multiple buildings being served by a single meter) to be a distribution system that is subject to the Federal pipeline safety regulations in 49 CFR Parts 191 and 192. I hope that this information is helpful to you. If I can be of further assistance, please contact me at 202-366-4046. 0 Director, Office of Standards and Rulemaking The Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, Otlice of Pipeline Safety provides written clarifications of the Regulations (49 CFR Parts !90-199) in the form of interpretation letters. These letters reflect the agency's current application of the regulations to the specific facts presented by the person requesting the clarification. Interpretations do not create legally-enforceable rights or obligations and are provided to help the public understand how to comply with the regulations.#
Page 3SEP ·o 6 2011 STATE INDIANA INDIANA UTJLLTY REGULATORY COMMISSION I 01 WEST WASHlNGTON STREET, SUITE 1500 EAST lNDIANAPOLTS, INDIANA 46204-3407 http://www.in.gov/iurc Office: (317) 232-2701 Facsimile: (3 17) 232-6758 August 30, 2011 Mr. Jeffrey D. Wiese, Associate Administrator Pipeline & Hazardous Materials Safety Administration US Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE East Building, 2nd Floor Washington, DC 20590 Dear Mr. Wiese: The Pipeline Safety Division of the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission requests an interpretation of 49 CFR 191.3 regarding master meter natural gas systems. You can also expect to receive a similar request on behalf of the Indiana Apartment Association. There is an apartment complex in our state whose owners dispute our determination that they are operating natural gas distribution systems and therefore should fall under our jurisdiction and the requirements found in 49 CFR 191 and 192, and 40 and 199, and 170 lAC 5-3. The property in question includes approximately twenty buildings, each having five to seven residential units that are served by natural gas from the local distribution company (LDC). There is a meter, owned by the LDC, at the end of each of these buildings; the apartment owner's piping downstream from the meter goes back underground and around the back of the building to each unit. The piping for each tenant's individual unit proceeds to a riser where it enters the building for each individual ultimate customer, the tenant. There is a minimum of 12,293 feet of underground natural gas piping owned by the landlord which is located adjacent to and around the length of the twenty gas serviced buildings. The property owners, and the Indiana Apartment Association, dispute our determination because there are not multiple buildings being served by a single meter. By the fact that there is a single meter per building, they insist that they are not, by definition, master meter operators. The Pipeline Safety Division maintains that the apartment complex owners fall under the definition of 49 CFR 191.3, and, because they are providing natural gas to their residents and recovering their cost through rents, they are operating natural gas distribution systems. Further, there is the fact that the property owner's piping is all underground, which, in our opinion, increases risk for the residents.#
Page 4As I requested in the beginning of this letter, we request a determination from PHMSA regarding the status of the owners of this apartment complex as natural gas operators and subject to federal and state pipeline safety laws. You should know that there are other apartment complexes in Indiana and likely nation-wide, with similar piping configurations. It would no doubt be helpful for all if you could clarify this situation for all similar apartment complexes. Thank you for your consideration of this matter. Robert Veneck, Executive Director Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission RV/bh Enclosures 2#
Page 505/19/2011 15:42#
Page 605/19/2011 15:40#
Page 74917 4915 4907 4905 05/19/2011 15:43 4901#
Page 805/19/2011 15:39#
This material provides agency context. It does not replace binding regulatory text, and its legal effect depends on the underlying authority and facts.