PI-78-021
PI-78-021
Page 1July 17, 1978 Mr. Calvin F. Broussard Production Technician Union Oil Company of California P.O. Box 51388, O.C.S. Lafayette, Louisiana 70505 Dear Mr. Broussard; We apologize for the delay in answering your letter of May 5, 1978, concerning the jurisdictional demarcation under the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the Department of Transportation (DOT) and the Department of the Interior (DOI) regarding offshore pipelines. Under the MOU, DOT is responsible for "pipelines extending to the shore from the outlet flange" at certain offshore facilities. DOI is responsible for "pipelines extending upstream from the outlet flange." We concur with your interpretation that jurisdictional demarcation occurs "at the last flange on a platform before or upstream of the departing pipeline riser." We also concur that as shown on your typical gas production schematic, the last flange is within the area of DOT responsibility. Sincerely, Cesar DeLeon Associate Director for Pipeline Safety Regulation Materials Transportation Bureau dal\192.1-a\1\78-07-17 1#
Page 2May 5, 1978 Office of Pipeline Safety Operation 2100 2nd Street S.W. Washington, D.C. 20590 Attention: Mr. Cesar DeLeon, Acting Director Gentlemen: Re: Request for Interpretation of Memorandum of Understanding Between the Department of Transportation and the Department of the Interior Regarding Offshore Pipelines. _ The Memorandum of Understanding Between the Department of Transportation and the Interior Regarding Offshore Pipelines establishes the different areas of jurisdiction of the two Departments but the exact point of jurisdictional change is not clear. This was discussed by telephone with Mr. Frank Fulton with the Office of Pipeline Safety Operation on March 15, 1978. He suggested that a formal letter be written with a typical schematic indicating this point of jurisdictional change. The attached schematic illustrates the major production equipment and flow pattern on a typical gas production platform. Jurisdictional change is indicated at the last flange on a platform before or upstream of the departing pipeline riser. Union Oil Company of California appreciates your cooperation in this matter. If you concur with our interpretation of the point of jurisdictional change as indicated on the attached typical schematic, please sign and return the attached copy for our records. Yours very truly, UNION OIL COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA Calvin F. Broussard Production Technician dal\192.1-a\1\78-07-17 2#
This material provides agency context. It does not replace binding regulatory text, and its legal effect depends on the underlying authority and facts.