PI-79-022
PI-79-022
Page 1Mr. William C. Salone, III Vice President & General Manager Kansas Public Service Company, Inc. 733 Massachusetts Lawrence, Kansas 66044 Dear Mr. Salome: This refers to your letter of March 9, 1979, regarding safety recommendations made to your company in NTSB's report No. PAR-78-4. In connection with certain recommendations about the use of anchors to prevent the pullout of plastic pipe from mechanical fittings, you have asked what constitutes an "anchor" and whether any transition couplers on the market can be considered an "anchor." The Federal safety standards for gas pipelines (CFR Part 192) do not define the term "anchor," although it is used in Section 192.161(e). This rule provides that "Each underground pipeline that is connected to a relatively unyielding line or other fixed object must have enough flexibility to provide for possible movement, or it must have an anchor that will limit the movement of the pipeline." The purpose of this rule is to ensure that a pipeline is not damaged by anticipated movement. Since this objective may be accomplished by holding the pipeline in place, an "anchor" would comprise any method by which the pipeline is firmly fixed to limit movement, including, if the anticipated movement is due to pullout forces, the use of properly designed and installed couplers. Various manufacturers are producing couplers which can restrain the movement of plastic pipe within design limits and satisfy Section 192.161(e). I hope this reply has been responsive to your inquiry. If we can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact us again. Sincerely, /signed/ Cesar DeLeon Associate Director for Pipeline Safety Regulation Materials Transportation Bureau DB C:\WP51\INTERPRT\192\161\79-07-23 1#
Page 2Mr. L. D. Sautman Materials Transportation Bureau Department Of Transportation Washington, D. C. 20590 Dear Mr. Sautman: Our firm had a pipeline accident in December of 1977 and we are well along on complying with the recommendation made by the NTSB. One of the important points related to plastic to steel "anchors" and I feel that we need a rather firm answer as to what constitutes an "anchor" and whether any transition couplers on the market can be considered an "anchor." We would appreciate any information on this matter or specific recommendations. I understand other gas distribution systems are deeply interested. Very truly yours, KANSAS PUBLIC SERVICE CO., INC. William C. Salome, III Vice President & General Manager DB C:\WP51\INTERPRT\192\161\79-07-23 2#
This material provides agency context. It does not replace binding regulatory text, and its legal effect depends on the underlying authority and facts.