PI-95-048
PI-95-048
Page 1SR-95-115 U.S. Department 400 Seventh Street, SW of Transportation Washington, DC 20590 Research and Special Programs Administration October 18, 1995 Ms. Angela S. Motley Public Utilities Engineer Massachusetts Department of Public Utilities Leverett Saltonstall Building 100 Cambridge Street Boston, MA 02202 Dear Ms. Motley: This is in response to your letter of August 2, 1995, requesting an opinion on 49 CFR 192.229(c) which states in part: “A welder qualified under §192.227(a) may not weld unless within the preceding 6 calendar months the welder has had one weld tested and found acceptable under section 3 or 6 of API Standard 1104 . . .” You cite a situation where welders’ radiograph inspection sheets submitted to document compliance with §192.229(c) were of 16-inch welds completed by two welders. You ask: “ Does this meet the code requirements since the weld was completed by more than one welder?” The intent of the requirement in §192.229(c) is for at least one entire weld to be tested and found acceptable under section 3 or 6 of API Standard 1104 within the preceding six calendar month period in order for the welder to continue to be qualified under §192.227(a). We agree with the observation in your letter that the welder needs to demonstrate the ability to weld in all welding positions. Sincerely, Richard D. Huriaux, P.E. Director for Technology and Regulations Office of Pipeline Safety 95-10-18.doc 192.229#
This material provides agency context. It does not replace binding regulatory text, and its legal effect depends on the underlying authority and facts.