P-78-010
P-78-010
NTSB safety recommendation P-78-010.
THE NTSB RECOMMENDS THAT THE MATERIALS TRANSPORTATION BUREAU OF THE U. S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION: INCLUDE IN PROPOSED REGULATIONS A SECTION SIMILAR TO THE EMERGENCY PLAN SECTION OF THE NATURAL GAS CODE (49 CFR 192.615) THAT WILL REQUIRE OPERATORS TO PROVIDE INFORMATION TO PERSONS WHO LIVE OR WORK WITHIN 220 YARDS OF A PROPANE PIPELINE, AND UP TO 1 MILE IF LOCATED DOWNHILL OF A LPG PIPELINE, ABOUT THE PARTICULAR HAZARDS OF LPG AND HOW TO CONTACT EMERGENCY RESPONSE PERSONNEL.
Priority: CLASS III
Overall Status: Closed - Acceptable Action
Issued Date: 1978-02-08
Adopted Date: 1978-01-12
Overall Date Closed: 1980-06-03
Synopsis: ON JULY 20, 1977, A 12-INCH PROPANE PIPELINE, OWNED BY THE CONSOLIDATED GAS SUPPLY CORPORATION, RUPTURED NEAR THE TOWN OF RUFF CREEK, PENNSYLVANIA. THE LIQUID ESCAPED FROM THE PIPELINE, VAPORIZED, AND PROPANE VAPORS SETTLED LIKE A FOG OVER THE BOTTOM OF A VALLEY. TWO MEN IN A PICKUP TRUCK ENTERED THE PROPANE CLOUD; THE TRUCK STALLED AND THE PROPANE GAS IGNITED WHEN AN ATTEMPT WAS MADE TO RESTART THE TRUCK. THE 2 PERSONS IN THE TRUCK WERE KILLED.
Ntsbnumber: DCA77MP027
Report Number: PAR-78-01
Addressee Name: RSPA
Addressee Status: Closed - Acceptable Action
Addressee Date Closed: 1980-06-03
Addressee Acronym: RSPA
Addressee Organization Type: G-Federal Government
Communication Date: 1978-09-12
Communication Type: Official Correspondence
Communication Contents: MTB LTR: MTB PUBLISHED A NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING ON AUGUST 10, 1978, WHICH INCORPORATED THE INTENT OF RECOMMENDATIONSS P-78-9 AND P-78-10. 7/16/79 - FEDERAL REGISTER, FINAL RULE, NPRM PUBLISHED AUGUST 10, 1978: THE NPRM OF AUGUST 10, 1978 INCLUDED THE WORDING RECOMMENDED IN P-78-10. THE REQUIREMENT IS NOT UNDER THE "EMERGENCIES" SECTION BUT IN A SEPARATE SECTION 195.440, "PUBLIC EDUCATION."
Addressee Acronym: RSPA
Addressee Organization Type: G-Federal Government
Communication Date: 1980-06-03
Communication Type: Official Correspondence
This material provides agency context. It does not replace binding regulatory text, and its legal effect depends on the underlying authority and facts.