2022 Gas Distribution IA Question Set

AR.PTIprocedurePage 1AR.PTI.PRESSTESTACCEP.POfficial PDFTest Acceptance Criteria and Procedures Were test acceptance criteria and procedures/processes sufficient to assure the basis for an acceptable pressure test? References: 192.503(a), 192.503(b), 192.503(c), 192.503(d), 192.503(e), 192.505(a), 192.505(b), 192.505(c), 192.505(d), 192.507(a), 192.507(b), 192.50, 192.513(a), 192.513(b), 192.513(c), 192.513(d)#

AR.RCOMprocedurePage 1AR.RCOM.REPAIR.PDoes the process give sufficient guidance for personnel to repair or replace pipe that has corroded to an extent that there is no longer sufficient remaining strength in the pipe wall? References: 192.605(b)(2), 192.487(a), 192.487(b), 192.489(a), 192.489(b), 192.491(c)#

AR.RCOMrecordPage 1AR.RCOM.REPAIR.RDo records document the repair or replacement of pipe that has been internally corroded to an extent that there is not sufficient remaining strength in the pipe wall? References: 192.487, 192.489#

AR.RCOMobservationPage 1AR.RCOM.REMEDIATIONOM.OIs anomaly remediation and documentation of remediation adequate for all segments? References: 192.487(a), 192.487(b), 192.489#

AR.RMPprocedurePage 1AR.RMP.SAFETY.PDoes the process ensure that repairs are made in a safe manner and are made so as to prevent damage to persons and property? References: 192.605(b)(9), 192.713(b)#

AR.RMPobservationPage 1AR.RMP.IGNITION.OPrevention of Accidental Ignition Perform observations of selected locations to verify that adequate steps have been taken by the operator to minimize the potential for accidental ignition. References: 192.751(a), 192.751(b), 192.751(c)#

AR.RMPprocedurePage 1AR.RMP.HOTTAP.PIs the process adequate for tapping pipelines under pressure? References: 192.605(b)(1), 192.627#

AR.RMPprocedurePage 2AR.RMP.TESTREINSTATE.PIs the process adequate for the testing of disconnected service lines? References: 192.605(b), 192.725(a), 192.725(b)#

AR.RMPrecordPage 2AR.RMP.TESTREINSTATE.RTest Reinstated Service Lines From the review of records, did the operator properly test disconnected service lines? References: 192.603(b), 192.725(a), 192.725(b)#

CR.CRMGENprocedurePage 2CR.CRMGEN.CRMCRITERIA.PDo procedures adequately address the process and criteria to determine which facilities are control rooms? References: 192.631(a)(2)#

CR.CRMGENprocedurePage 2CR.CRMGEN.CRMMGMT.PAre CRM procedures formalized and controlled? References: 192.631(a)(2)#

CR.CRMGENrecordPage 2CR.CRMGEN.CRMIMPLEMENT.RControl Room Management Were procedures approved, in place, and implemented on or before the regulatory deadline? References: 192.631(a)(2)#

CR.CRMGENobservationPage 2CR.CRMGEN.CRMPROCLOCATION.OAre procedures readily available to controllers in the control room? References: 192.631(a)(2)#

CR.CRMRRprocedurePage 2CR.CRMRR.RESPONSIBLE.PAre there clear processes to describe each controller's physical domain of responsibility for pipelines and other facility assets? References: 192.631(b)#

CR.CRMRRprocedurePage 3CR.CRMRR.QUALCONTROL.PAre there provisions in place to assure that only qualified individuals may assume control at any console/desk? References: 192.631(b)#

CR.CRMRRprocedurePage 3CR.CRMRR.DOMAINCHANGE.PIf the physical domain of responsibility periodically changes, has a clear process been established to describe the conditions for when such a change occurs? References: 192.631(b)#

CR.CRMRRprocedurePage 3CR.CRMRR.AUTHORITYABNORMAL.PHave processes been established to define the controllers' authority and responsibilities when an abnormal operating condition is detected? References: 192.631(b)(2)#

CR.CRMRRprocedurePage 3CR.CRMRR.RESPCHANGE.PDo processes address a controller's role during temporary impromptu (unplanned) changes in controller responsibilities? References: 192.631(b)#

CR.CRMRRprocedurePage 3CR.CRMRR.COMMANDVERIFY.PDo the defined roles and responsibilities require controllers to stay at the console to verify all SCADA commands that have been initiated are fulfilled, and that commands given via verbal communications are acknowledged before leaving the console for any reason? References: 192.631(b)#

CR.CRMRRobservationPage 3CR.CRMRR.PRESSLIMITS.OAre controllers aware of the current MAOPs of all pipeline segments for which they are responsible, and have they been assigned the responsibility to maintain those pipelines at or below the MAOP? References: 192.631(b)(2), 192.619(a), 192.631(e)(1)#

CR.CRMRRprocedurePage 3CR.CRMRR.AUTHORITYEMERGENCY.PDo processes define the controllers' authority and responsibility to make decisions, take actions, and communicate with others upon being notified of, or upon detection of, and during, an emergency or if a leak or rupture is suspected? References: 192.631(b)(3), 192.615(a)(8)#

CR.CRMRRprocedurePage 3CR.CRMRR.EVACUATION.PDo processes specifically address the controller's responsibilities in the event the control room must be evacuated? References: 192.631(b)(3)#

CR.CRMRRprocedurePage 4CR.CRMRR.COMMSYSFAIL.PDo processes specifically address the controller's responsibilities in the event of a SCADA system or data communications system failure impacting large sections of the controller's domain of responsibility? References: 192.631(b)(3)#

CR.CRMRRprocedurePage 4CR.CRMRR.HANDOVER.PHave processes been established for the hand-over of responsibility that specify the type of information to be communicated to the oncoming shift? References: 192.631(b)(4), 192.631(c)(5)#

CR.CRMRRobservationPage 4CR.CRMRR.HANDOVER.ODo observations indicate adequate hand-over of responsibility to the oncoming shift? References: 192.631(b)(4), 192.631(c)(5)#

CR.CRMRRprocedurePage 4CR.CRMRR.HANDOVERDOC.PDo processes require that records document the hand-over of responsibility, document the time the actual hand-over of responsibility occurs, and the key information and topics that were communicated during the hand-over? References: 192.631(b)(4), 192.631(c)(5)#

CR.CRMRRrecordPage 4CR.CRMRR.HANDOVERDOC.RAre there records that document the hand-over of responsibility, document the time the actual hand-over of responsibility occurs, and the key information and topics that were communicated during the hand-over? References: 192.631(b)(4), 192.631(c)(5)#

CR.CRMRRprocedurePage 4CR.CRMRR.HANDOVEROVERLAP.PDo processes require the controllers to discuss recent and impending important activities ensuring adequate overlap? References: 192.631(b)(4)#

CR.CRMRRprocedurePage 4CR.CRMRR.HANDOVERALTERNATIVE.PWhen a controller is unable to continue or assume responsibility for any reason, do the shift hand-over processes include alternative shift hand-over actions that specifically address this situation? References: 192.631(b)(4)#

CR.CRMRRprocedurePage 4CR.CRMRR.UNATTENDCONSOLE.PHas the operator established an adequate process for occasions when the console is left temporarily unattended for any reason? References: 192.631(b)(4)#

CR.CRMRRprocedurePage 4CR.CRMRR.CONSOLECOVERAGE.PDo processes maintain adequate console coverage during shift hand-over? References: 192.631(b)(4)#

CR.CRMRRprocedurePage 5CR.CRMRR.OTHERAUTHORITYDISALLOW.PDo processes disallow others to have authority to direct or supersede the specific technical actions of a controller? References: 192.631(b)(5)#

CR.CRMRRrecordPage 5CR.CRMRR.OTHERAUTHORITYDISALLOW.RDo records indicate that the policy disallowing others to have authority to direct or supersede the specific technical actions of a controller has been communicated to controllers and others? References: 192.631(b)(5)#

CR.CRMRRobservationPage 5CR.CRMRR.OTHERAUTHORITYDISALLOW.OAre controllers aware of, and can reference, processes that disallow others to have authority to direct or supersede the specific technical actions of a controller? References: 192.631(b)(5)#

CR.CRMRRprocedurePage 5CR.CRMRR.OTHERAUTHORITYQUAL.PDoes the process result in identification of required qualification elements for those authorized to direct or supersede the technical actions of a controller that are sufficient for those individuals to understand the implications of the scope of potential actions? References: 192.631(b)(5)#

CR.CRMRRrecordPage 5CR.CRMRR.OTHERAUTHORITYQUAL.RDo records indicate that others given authority to direct or supersede the specific technical actions of a controller were qualified? References: 192.631(b)(5)#

CR.CRMRRprocedurePage 5CR.CRMRR.OTHERAUTHORITYIMPLEMENT.PIs the process defined with respect to the details of how those authorized to direct or supersede the technical actions of a controller are to implement their authority? References: 192.631(b)(5)#

CR.CRMRRrecordPage 5CR.CRMRR.OTHERAUTHORITYLIST.RIs a list of individuals with authority to direct or supersede the technical actions of a controller readily available to controllers? References: 192.631(b)(5)#

CR.CRMRRrecordPage 5CR.CRMRR.OTHERAUTHORITYIMPLEMENT.RDo records adequately document occurrences of when others authorized to direct or supersede the technical actions of a controller have done so? References: 192.631(b)(5)#

CR.CRMRRobservationPage 6CR.CRMRR.OTHERAUTHORITYIMPLEMENT.ODo others authorized to direct or supersede the technical actions of a controller demonstrate an understanding of the process to implement this authority? References: 192.631(b)(5)#

CR.SCADAprocedurePage 6CR.SCADA.SYSTEMMOC.PDo processes clearly define the types of changes to the SCADA system(s) that constitute additions, expansions, or replacements under the meaning of the CRM rule? References: 192.631(c)(1)#

CR.SCADAprocedurePage 6CR.SCADA.DISPLAYCONFIG.PAre there written processes to implement the API RP 1165 display standards to the SCADA systems that have been added, expanded, or replaced since August 1, 2012? References: 192.631(c)(1)#

CR.SCADAobservationPage 6CR.SCADA.1165HUMANFACTORS.OHas section 4 of API RP 1165 regarding human factors engineering been implemented? References: 192.631(c)(1)#

CR.SCADAobservationPage 6CR.SCADA.DISPLAYOBJECTS.OHas section 8 of API RP 1165 regarding display object characteristics been implemented? References: 192.631(c)(1)#

CR.SCADArecordPage 6CR.SCADA.DISPLAYDYNAMICS.RHas Section 9 of API RP 1165 regarding display object dynamics been implemented? References: 192.631(c)(1)#

CR.SCADArecordPage 6CR.SCADA.ADMINISTRATION.RHave applicable paragraphs of section 11 of API RP 1165 administration been implemented? References: 192.631(c)(1)#

CR.SCADArecordPage 6CR.SCADA.1165IMPRACTICAL.RIf any/all applicable paragraph(s) of API RP 1165 have not been implemented, has it been demonstrated and documented that the unimplemented provisions are impractical for the SCADA system used? References: 192.631(c)(1)#

CR.SCADAprocedurePage 7CR.SCADA.SETPOINT.PDoes the process adequately define safety-related points? References: 192.631(c)(2)#

CR.SCADArecordPage 7CR.SCADA.SETPOINT.RDo records indicate safety-related points have been adequately implemented? References: 192.631(c)(2)#

CR.SCADAprocedurePage 7CR.SCADA.POINTVERIFY.PAre there adequate processes to define and identify the circumstances which require a point-to-point verification? References: 192.631(c)(2)#

CR.SCADArecordPage 7CR.SCADA.POINTVERIFY.RHave required point-to-point verifications been performed? References: 192.631(c)(2)#

CR.SCADAprocedurePage 7CR.SCADA.POINTVERIFYEXTENT.PAre there adequate processes for the thoroughness of the point-to-point verification? References: 192.631(c)(2)#

CR.SCADArecordPage 7CR.SCADA.POINTVERIFYEXTENT.RDo records demonstrate adequate thoroughness of the point-to-point verification? References: 192.631(c)(2)#

CR.SCADAprocedurePage 7CR.SCADA.POINTVERFIYINTVL.PIs there an adequate process for defining when the point-to-point verification must be completed? References: 192.631(c)(2)#

CR.SCADArecordPage 7CR.SCADA.POINTVERFIYINTVL.RDo records indicate the point-to-point verification has been completed at the required intervals? References: 192.631(c)(2)#

CR.SCADAobservationPage 7CR.SCADA.POINTVERIFY.OAre point-to-point verifications performed adequately when required? References: 192.631(c)(2)#

CR.SCADAprocedurePage 8CR.SCADA.COMMPLAN.PHas an internal communication plan been established and implemented that is adequate to manually operate the pipeline during a SCADA failure/outage? References: 192.631(c)(3)#

CR.SCADArecordPage 8CR.SCADA.COMMPLAN.RHas the internal communication plan been tested and verified for manual operation of the pipeline safely at least once each calendar year but at intervals not exceeding 15 months? References: 192.631(c)(3)#

CR.SCADAobservationPage 8CR.SCADA.BACKUPSCADA.OIs there a backup SCADA system? References: 192.631(c)#

CR.SCADAprocedurePage 8CR.SCADA.BACKUPSCADADEV.PHas the use of the backup SCADA system for development work been defined? References: 192.631(c)(4)#

CR.SCADAprocedurePage 8CR.SCADA.BACKUPSCADATEST.PIs the backup SCADA system required to be tested at least once each calendar year at intervals not to exceed 15 months? References: 192.631(c)(4)#

CR.SCADArecordPage 8CR.SCADA.BACKUPSCADATEST.RIs the backup SCADA system tested at least once each calendar year at intervals not to exceed 15 months? References: 192.631(c)(4)#

CR.SCADAprocedurePage 8CR.SCADA.BACKUPSCADAVERIFY.PIs testing required to verify adequate processes are in place for decision-making and internal communications to successfully implement a transition from primary SCADA to backup SCADA, and back to primary SCADA? References: 192.631(c)(4)#

CR.SCADArecordPage 8CR.SCADA.BACKUPSCADAVERIFY.RDoes the testing verify that there are adequate processes in place for decision-making and internal communications to successfully implement a transition from primary SCADA to backup SCADA, and back to primary SCADA? References: 192.631(c)(4)#

CR.SCADArecordPage 8CR.SCADA.BACKUPSCADAADEQUACY.RIf the back-up SCADA system is not designed to handle all the functionality of the main SCADA system, does the testing determine whether there are adequate procedures in place to account for displaced and/or different available functions during back-up operations? References: 192.631(c)(4)#

CR.SCADAprocedurePage 9CR.SCADA.BACKUPSCADATRANSFER.PDo processes adequately address and test the logistics of transferring control to a backup control room? References: 192.631(c)(4)#

CR.SCADAprocedurePage 9CR.SCADA.BACKUPSCADARETURN.PDo procedures adequately address and test the logistics of returning operations back to the primary control room? References: 192.631(c)(4)#

CR.SCADArecordPage 9CR.SCADA.BACKUPSCADAFUNCTIONS.RIs a representative sampling of critical functions in the back-up SCADA system being tested to ensure proper operation in the event the backup system is needed? References: 192.631(c)(4)#

CR.CRMFMprocedurePage 9CR.CRMFM.FATIGUEMITIGATION.PDoes the fatigue mitigation process or procedures (plan) identify operator-specific fatigue risks? References: 192.631(d)#

CR.CRMFMprocedurePage 9CR.CRMFM.FATIGUERISKS.PDoes the fatigue mitigation plan adequately address how the program reduces the risk associated with controller fatigue? References: 192.631(d)#

CR.CRMFMprocedurePage 9CR.CRMFM.FATIGUEQUANTIFY.PDo processes require that the potential contribution of controller fatigue to incidents and accidents be quantified during investigations? References: 192.631(d)#

CR.CRMFMprocedurePage 9CR.CRMFM.FATIGUEMANAGER.PIs there a designated fatigue risk manager who is responsible and accountable for managing fatigue risk and fatigue countermeasures, and someone (perhaps the same person) that is authorized to review and approve HOS emergency deviations? References: 192.631(d)#

CR.CRMFMrecordPage 9CR.CRMFM.SHIFTLENGTH.RIs the scheduled shift length less than or equal to 12 hours (not including shift hand-over) or is there a documented technical basis to show that shift lengths and schedule rotations are adequate to provide controllers off- duty time sufficient to achieve 8 hours of continuous sleep? References: 192.631(d)(1)#

CR.CRMFMrecordPage 10CR.CRMFM.SHIFTLENGTHTIME.RDoes the operator factor in all time the individual is working for the company when establishing shift lengths and schedule rotations or is there a documented technical basis to show that shift lengths and schedule rotations are adequate to provide controllers off-duty time sufficient to achieve 8 hours of continuous sleep? References: 192.631(d)(1)#

CR.CRMFMrecordPage 10CR.CRMFM.SCHEDULEDTIMEOFF.RAre all scheduled periods of time off at least one hour longer than 8 hours plus commute time or is there a documented technical basis to show that shift lengths and schedule rotations are adequate to provide controllers off-duty time sufficient to achieve 8 hours of continuous sleep? References: 192.631(d)(1)#

CR.CRMFMprocedurePage 10CR.CRMFM.ONCALLCONTROLLER.POn Call Controllers For controllers who are on call, do processes minimize interrupting the required 8 hours of continuous sleep or require a documented technical basis to show that shift lengths and schedule rotations are adequate to provide controllers off-duty time sufficient to achieve 8 hours of continuous sleep? References: 192.631(d)#

CR.CRMFMrecordPage 10CR.CRMFM.ONCALLCONTROLLER.ROn Call Controllers For controllers who are on call, does the operator minimize interrupting the required 8 hours of continuous sleep or is there a documented technical basis to show that shift lengths and schedule rotations are adequate to provide controllers off-duty time sufficient to achieve 8 hours of continuous sleep? References: 192.631(d)(1)#

CR.CRMFMprocedurePage 10CR.CRMFM.MAXHOS.PDo processes limit the maximum HOS limit in any sliding 7-day period to no more than 65 hours or is there a documented technical basis to show a reduction of the risk associated with controller fatigue? References: 192.631(d)(4)#

CR.CRMFMprocedurePage 10CR.CRMFM.MINTIMEOFF.PMinimum Time Off After HOS Limit Reached After reaching the HOS limit in any sliding 7-day period, is the minimum time off at least 35 hours or is there a documented technical basis to show a reduction of the risk associated with controller fatigue? References: 192.631(d)(4)#

CR.CRMFMprocedurePage 10CR.CRMFM.DOCSCHEDULE.PIs there a formal system to document all scheduled and unscheduled HOS worked, including overtime and time spent performing duties other than control room duties? References: 192.631(d)(4)#

CR.CRMFMprocedurePage 10CR.CRMFM.DAYSOFF.PTime Off Following Successive Days Worked For normal business hour type operations (i.e., five days per week), are no more than five days worked in succession before at least two days off? References: 192.631(d)(4)#

CR.CRMFMrecordPage 11CR.CRMFM.WORKHOURS.RDay Only Work Hours For normal business hour type operations (i.e., five days per week), do records indicate shift start times no earlier than 6:00 a.m. and shift end times no later than 7:00 p.m.? References: 192.631(d)(4)#

CR.CRMFMprocedurePage 11CR.CRMFM.FATIGUECOUNTERMEASURES.PFatigue Countermeasures For shifts longer than 8 hours, have specific fatigue countermeasures been implemented for the ninth and beyond hours? References: 192.631(d)(4)#

CR.CRMFMprocedurePage 11CR.CRMFM.DAILYHOSLIMIT.PDo processes limit the daily maximum HOS limit no more than 14 hours in any sliding 24-hour period? References: 192.631(d)(4)#

CR.CRMFMobservationPage 11CR.CRMFM.CONTROLLERNUMBERS.ODo operations include a sufficient number of qualified controllers? References: 192.631(d)#

CR.CRMFMprocedurePage 11CR.CRMFM.OFFDUTYHOURS.PWhen Limits Reached Do processes ensure that controllers are provided with at least thirty-five (35) continuous off-duty hours when limits are reached following the most recent 35-hour (minimum) off-duty rest period or is there a documented technical basis to show that the maximum limit on controller HOS is adequate to reduce the risk associated with controller fatigue? References: 192.631(d)(4)#

CR.CRMFMprocedurePage 11CR.CRMFM.SHIFTHOLDOVER.PDoes the shift holdover process conform to shift holdover guidelines or is there a documented technical basis to show that the maximum limit on controller HOS is adequate to reduce the risk associated with controller fatigue? References: 192.631(d)(4)#

CR.CRMFMprocedurePage 11CR.CRMFM.SPECIFICCOUNTERMEASURES.PDo processes require specific fatigue countermeasures during applicable time periods, or is there a documented technical basis to show that the maximum limit on controller HOS is adequate to reduce the risk associated with controller fatigue? References: 192.631(d)(4)#

CR.CRMFMprocedurePage 11CR.CRMFM.HOSDEVIATIONS.PIs there a formal process for approving deviations from the maximum HOS limits? References: 192.631(d)(4)#

CR.CRMFMprocedurePage 11CR.CRMFM.FATIGUEEDUCATE.PDoes the program require that fatigue education/training is required for all controllers and control room supervisors? References: 192.631(d)(2), 192.631(d)(3)#

CR.CRMFMrecordPage 12CR.CRMFM.FATIGUEEDUCATE.RIs fatigue education/training documented for all controllers and control room supervisors? References: 192.631(d)(2), 192.631(d)(3)#

CR.CRMFMprocedurePage 12CR.CRMFM.FATIGUEREVIEW.PDo processes require that the effectiveness of the fatigue education/training program be reviewed at least once each calendar year, not to exceed 15 months? References: 192.631(d)(2), 192.631(d)(3), 192.605(a)#

CR.CRMFMprocedurePage 12CR.CRMFM.FATIGUESTRATEGY.PDoes fatigue education address fatigue mitigation strategies (countermeasures)? References: 192.631(d)(2)#

CR.CRMFMprocedurePage 12CR.CRMFM.OFFDUTY.PDoes fatigue education address how off-duty activities contribute to fatigue? References: 192.631(d)(2)#

CR.CRMFMprocedurePage 12CR.CRMFM.FATIGUECONTENT.PIs the content of fatigue training adequate for training controllers and supervisors to recognize the effects of fatigue? References: 192.631(d)(3)#

CR.CRMFMrecordPage 12CR.CRMFM.FATIGUECONTENT.RHas controller and supervisor training to recognize the effects of fatigue been documented? References: 192.631(d)(3)#

CR.CRMAMprocedurePage 12CR.CRMAM.ALARM.PIs the alarm management plan a formal process that specifically identifies critical topical areas included in the program? References: 192.631(e)#

CR.CRMAMprocedurePage 12CR.CRMAM.ALARMMALFUNCTION.PIs there a process to identify and correct inaccurate or malfunctioning alarms? References: 192.631(e)(1)#

CR.CRMAMprocedurePage 13CR.CRMAM.ALARMREVIEW.PDoes the review of safety-related alarms account for different alarm designs and all alarm types/priorities? References: 192.631(e)(1)#

CR.CRMAMprocedurePage 13CR.CRMAM.CONTROLLERPERFORMANCE.PDoes the review of safety-related alarms account for console differences that could affect individual-specific controller qualification and performance? References: 192.631(h), 192.631(e)(1)#

CR.CRMAMprocedurePage 13CR.CRMAM.STALEDATA.PDoes the review of safety-related alarms include specific procedures and practices for managing stale or unreliable data? References: 192.631(e)(1)#

CR.CRMAMprocedurePage 13CR.CRMAM.MONTHLYANALYSIS.PDo processes require the monthly identification, recording, review, and analysis of points that have been taken off scan, have had alarms inhibited, generated false alarms, or that have had forced or manual values for periods of time exceeding that required for associated maintenance or operating activities? References: 192.631(e)(2)#

CR.CRMAMprocedurePage 13CR.CRMAM.PROBLEMCORRECTION.PDoes the alarm management plan include a process for promptly correcting identified problems and for returning these points to service? References: 192.631(e)(2)#

CR.CRMAMrecordPage 13CR.CRMAM.ALARMVERIFY.RDo records verify that monthly reviews and analysis of alarm points have been performed? References: 192.631(e)(2)#

CR.CRMAMprocedurePage 13CR.CRMAM.ALARMSETPOINTS.PIs there a formal process to determine the correct alarm setpoint values and alarm descriptions? References: 192.631(e)(3)#

CR.CRMAMprocedurePage 13CR.CRMAM.SETTINGCONTROL.PHave procedures been established to clearly address how and to what degree controllers can change alarm limits or setpoints, or inhibit alarms, or take points off-scan? References: 192.631(e)(3)#

CR.CRMAMrecordPage 13CR.CRMAM.ALARMVALUEVERIFY.RDo records demonstrate verification of correct safety-related alarm set-point values and alarm descriptors when associated field instruments are calibrated or changed and at least once each calendar year, but at intervals not to exceed 15 months? References: 192.631(e)(3)#

CR.CRMAMprocedurePage 14CR.CRMAM.PLANREVIEW.PAre there processes to review the alarm management plan at least once each calendar year, but at intervals not exceeding 15 months, in order to determine the effectiveness of the plan? References: 192.631(e)(4)#

CR.CRMAMrecordPage 14CR.CRMAM.PLANREVIEW.RDo records indicate review of the alarm management plan at least once each calendar year, but at intervals not exceeding 15 months, in order to determine the effectiveness of the plan? References: 192.631(e)(4)#

CR.CRMAMprocedurePage 14CR.CRMAM.WORKLOAD.PDoes the CRM program have a means of identifying and measuring the work load (content and volume of general activity) being directed to an individual controller? References: 192.631(e)(5)#

CR.CRMAMprocedurePage 14CR.CRMAM.WORKLOADMONITORING.PIs the process of monitoring and analyzing general activity comprehensive? References: 192.631(e)(5)#

CR.CRMAMprocedurePage 14CR.CRMAM.CONTROLLERREACTION.PDoes the process have a means of determining that the controller has sufficient time to analyze and react to incoming alarms? References: 192.631(e)(5)#

CR.CRMAMrecordPage 14CR.CRMAM.PERFORMANCEANALYSIS.RHas an analysis been performed to determine if controller(s) performance is currently adequate? References: 192.631(e)(5)#

CR.CRMAMprocedurePage 14CR.CRMAM.DEFICIENCIES.PIs there a process to address how deficiencies found in implementing 192.631(e)(1) through 192.631(e)(5) will be resolved? References: 192.631(e)(6)#

CR.CRMAMrecordPage 14CR.CRMAM.DEFICIENCIES.RDo records indicate deficiencies found in implementing 192.631(e)(1) through 192.631(e)(5) have been resolved? References: 192.631(e)(6)#

CR.CRMCMGTprocedurePage 15CR.CRMCMGT.EQUIPMENTCHANGES.PIs there a process to assure changes in field equipment that could affect control room operations are coordinated with the control room personnel? References: 192.631(f)(1)#

CR.CRMCMGTprocedurePage 15CR.CRMCMGT.CONTROLLERPARTICIPATE.PAre control room representative(s) required to participate in meetings where changes that could directly or indirectly affect the hydraulic performance or configuration of the pipeline (including routine maintenance and repairs) are being considered, designed and implemented? References: 192.631(f)(1), 192.631(f)(3)#

CR.CRMCMGTrecordPage 15CR.CRMCMGT.CONTROLLERPARTICIPATE.RDo records indicate that control room representative(s) participate in meetings where changes that could directly or indirectly affect the hydraulic performance or configuration of the pipeline (including routine maintenance and repairs) are being considered, designed and implemented? References: 192.631(f)(1), 192.631(f)(3)#

CR.CRMCMGTprocedurePage 15CR.CRMCMGT.EMERGENCYCONTACT.PIs there a process requiring field personnel and SCADA support personnel to contact the control room when emergency conditions exist? References: 192.631(f)(2)#

CR.CRMCMGTprocedurePage 15CR.CRMCMGT.FIELDCONTACT.PDoes the process require field personnel and SCADA support personnel to contact the control room when making field changes (for example, moving a valve) that affect control room operations? References: 192.631(f)(2)#

CR.CRMCMGTrecordPage 15CR.CRMCMGT.FIELDCHANGES.RDo records indicate field personnel and SCADA support personnel contacted the control room when making field changes (for example, moving a valve) that affect control room operations? References: 192.631(f)(2)#

CR.CRMEXPprocedurePage 15CR.CRMEXP.REPORTABLEINCIDENTREVIEW.PIs there a formal, structured approach for reviewing and critiquing reportable events to identify lessons learned? References: 192.631(g)(1)#

CR.CRMEXPrecordPage 16CR.CRMEXP.REPORTABLEINCIDENTREVIEW.RDo records indicate reviews of reportable events specifically analyzed all contributing factors to determine if control room actions contributed to the event, and corrected any deficiencies? References: 192.631(g)(1)#

CR.CRMEXPprocedurePage 16CR.CRMEXP.LESSONSLEARNED.PDoes the program require training on lessons learned from a broad range of events (reportable incidents/accidents, near misses, leaks, operational and maintenance errors, etc.), even though the control room may not have been at fault? References: 192.631(g)(2), 192.631(b)(5)#

CR.CRMEXPrecordPage 16CR.CRMEXP.LESSONSLEARNED.RHas operating experience review training been conducted on lessons learned from a broad range of events (reportable incidents/accidents, near misses, leaks, operational and maintenance errors, etc.)? References: 192.631(g)(2), 192.631(b)(5)#

CR.CRMTRAINprocedurePage 16CR.CRMTRAIN.CONTROLLERTRAIN.PHas a controller training program been established to provide training for each controller to carry out their roles and responsibilities? References: 192.631(h)#

CR.CRMTRAINrecordPage 16CR.CRMTRAIN.CONTROLLERTRAIN.RHas a controller training program been implemented to provide training for each controller to carry out their roles and responsibilities? References: 192.631(h)#

CR.CRMTRAINprocedurePage 16CR.CRMTRAIN.TRAININGREVIEW.PHave processes been established to review the controller training program content to identify potential improvements at least once each calendar year, but at intervals not to exceed 15 months? References: 192.631(h)#

CR.CRMTRAINrecordPage 16CR.CRMTRAIN.TRAININGREVIEW.RHave processes been implemented to review the controller training program content to identify potential improvements at least once each calendar year, but at intervals not to exceed 15 months? References: 192.631(h)#

CR.CRMTRAINrecordPage 16CR.CRMTRAIN.TRAININGCONTENT.RDoes training content address all required material, including training each controller to carry out the roles and responsibilities that were defined by the operator? References: 192.631(h)#

CR.CRMTRAINrecordPage 17CR.CRMTRAIN.AOCLIST.RHas a list of the abnormal operating conditions that are likely to occur simultaneously or in sequence been established? References: 192.631(h)(1)#

CR.CRMTRAINprocedurePage 17CR.CRMTRAIN.TRAININGABNORMAL.PDoes the training program provide controller training on recognizing and responding to abnormal operating conditions that are likely to occur simultaneously or in sequence? References: 192.631(h)(1)#

CR.CRMTRAINrecordPage 17CR.CRMTRAIN.TRAINING.RDo records indicate the training program used a simulator or tabletop exercises to train controllers how to recognize and respond to abnormal operating conditions? References: 192.631(h)(2)#

CR.CRMTRAINobservationPage 17CR.CRMTRAIN.TRAINING.ODoes the training program use a simulator or tabletop exercises to train controllers how to recognize and respond to abnormal operating conditions? References: 192.631(h)(2)#

CR.CRMTRAINprocedurePage 17CR.CRMTRAIN.COMMUNICATIONTRAINING.PDoes the CRM program train controllers on their responsibilities for communication under the operator's emergency response procedures? References: 192.631(h)(3)#

CR.CRMTRAINprocedurePage 17CR.CRMTRAIN.SYSKNOWLEDGE.PDoes the training program provide controllers a working knowledge of the pipeline system, especially during the development of abnormal operating conditions? References: 192.631(h)(4)#

CR.CRMTRAINrecordPage 17CR.CRMTRAIN.INFREQOPSLIST.RHas a list of pipeline operating setups that are periodically (but infrequently) used been established? References: 192.631(h)(5)#

CR.CRMTRAINprocedurePage 17CR.CRMTRAIN.INFREQOPSREVIEW.PDo processes specify that, for pipeline operating set-ups that are periodically (but infrequently) used, the controllers must be provided an opportunity to review relevant procedures in advance of their use? References: 192.631(h)(5)#

CR.CRMTRAINprocedurePage 17CR.CRMTRAIN.TEAMTRAINPERSONNEL.PDo processes establish who, regardless of location, operationally collaborates with control room personnel? References: 192.631(h)(6)#

CR.CRMTRAINprocedurePage 18CR.CRMTRAIN.TEAMTRAINFREQ.PDo processes define the frequency of new and recurring team training? References: 192.631(h)(6)#

CR.CRMTRAINprocedurePage 18CR.CRMTRAIN.TEAMTRAINCOMPLETE.PDo processes address all operational modes and operational collaboration/control? References: 192.631(h)(6)#

CR.CRMTRAINprocedurePage 18CR.CRMTRAIN.TEAMTRAINEXPERIENCE.PDo processes include incorporation of lessons learned from actual historical events and other oil-gas industry events? References: 192.631(h)(6)#

CR.CRMTRAINrecordPage 18CR.CRMTRAIN.TEAMTRAINEXERCISE.RDo records indicate that training exercises were adequate and involved at least one qualified controller? References: 192.631(h)(6)#

CR.CRMTRAINobservationPage 18CR.CRMTRAIN.TEAMTRAINEXERCISE.ODoes implementation of a control room team exercise demonstrate performance in accordance with regulatory and process requirements? References: 192.631(h)(6)#

CR.CRMTRAINrecordPage 18CR.CRMTRAIN.TEAMTRAINIDENTINDIVIDUAL.RDo records demonstrate that individuals identified as of January 23, 2018 received team training by January 23, 2019? References: 192.631(h)(6)#

CR.CRMCOMPprocedurePage 18CR.CRMCOMP.SUBMITPROCEDURES.PAre there adequate processes to assure that the operator is responsive to requests from applicable agencies to submit their CRM procedures? References: 192.631(i)#

CR.CRMCOMPrecordPage 18CR.CRMCOMP.SUBMITPROCEDURES.RHas the operator been responsive to requests from applicable agencies to submit their CRM procedures? References: 192.631(i)#

CR.CRMCOMPrecordPage 19CR.CRMCOMP.CRMCOORDINATOR.RIs there an individual that is responsible and accountable for compliance with requests from PHMSA or other applicable agencies? References: 192.631(i)#

CR.CRMCOMPprocedurePage 19CR.CRMCOMP.RECORDS.PAre records management processes adequate to assure records are sufficient to demonstrate compliance with the CRM rule? References: 192.631(j)(1)#

CR.CRMCOMPrecordPage 19CR.CRMCOMP.RECORDS.RAre records sufficient to demonstrate compliance with the CRM rule? References: 192.631(j)(1)#

CR.CRMCOMPrecordPage 19CR.CRMCOMP.ELECTRONICRECORDS.RAre electronic records properly stored, safeguarded, and readily retrievable? References: 192.631(j)(1)#

CR.CRMCOMPprocedurePage 19CR.CRMCOMP.DEVIATIONS.PAre there processes to demonstrate and provide a documented record that every deviation from any CRM rule requirement was necessary for safe operation? References: 192.631(j)(2)#

CR.CRMCOMPrecordPage 19CR.CRMCOMP.DEVIATIONS.RDeviation Records Were all deviations documented in a way that demonstrates they were necessary for safe operation? References: 192.631(j)(2)#

DC.COprocedurePage 19DC.CO.PLASTICJOINT.PDoes the process require plastic pipe joints to be designed and installed in accordance with 192.281? References: 192.273(b), 192.281(a), 192.281(b), 192.281(c), 192.281(d), 192.281(e), 192.303#

DC.COprocedurePage 19DC.CO.PLASTICJOINTPROCEDURE.PDoes the process require plastic pipe joining procedures to be qualified in accordance with §192.283, prior to making plastic pipe joints? References: 192.273(b), 192.283(a), 192.283(b), 192.283(c)#

DC.COrecordPage 20DC.CO.PLASTICJOINTPROCEDURE.RHave plastic pipe joining procedures been qualified in accordance with 192.283? References: 192.273(b), 192.283(a), 192.283(b), 192.283(c)#

DC.COprocedurePage 20DC.CO.PLASTICJOINTQUAL.PIs a process in place to ensure that personnel making joints in plastic pipelines are qualified? References: 192.285(d), 192.285(a), 192.285(b), 192.285(c), 192.805#

DC.COrecordPage 20DC.CO.PLASTICJOINTQUAL.RDo records indicate persons making joints in plastic pipelines are qualified in accordance with 192.285? References: 192.285(d), 192.285(a), 192.285(b), 192.285(c), 192.807(a), 192.807(b)#

DC.COprocedurePage 20DC.CO.PLASTICJOINTINSP.PIs a process in place to assure that persons who inspect joints in plastic pipes are qualified? References: 192.287, 192.805(h)#

DC.COrecordPage 20DC.CO.PLASTICJOINTINSP.RDo records indicate persons inspecting the making of plastic pipe joints have been qualified? References: 192.287, 192.807(a), 192.807(b)#

DC.WELDINSPprocedurePage 20DC.WELDINSP.WELDVISUALQUAL.PDoes the process require visual inspections of welds to be conducted by qualified inspectors? References: 192.303, 192.241(a), 192.241(b), 192.241(c)#

DC.WELDINSPprocedurePage 20DC.WELDINSP.WELDNDT.PIs there a process for welds nondestructive testing and interpretation in accordance with 192.243? References: 192.243(a), 192.243(b), 192.243(c), 192.243(d), 192.243(e)#

DC.WELDINSPprocedurePage 20DC.WELDINSP.WELDREPAIR.PDoes the process require welds that are unacceptable to be removed and/or repaired as specified by 192.245? References: 192.303, 192.245(a), 192.245(b), 192.245(c)#

DC.WELDERQUALprocedurePage 21DC.WELDERQUAL.WELDERLIMITNDT.PDoes the process require certain limitations be placed on welders and welding operators in accordance with 192.229? References: 192.303, 192.229(a), 192.229(b), 192.229(c), 192.229(d)#

DC.WELDPROCEDUREprocedurePage 21DC.WELDPROCEDURE.WELD.PDoes the process require welding to be performed by qualified welders using qualified welding procedures and are welding procedures and qualifying tests required to be recorded in detail? References: 192.225(a), 192.225(b)#

DC.WELDPROCEDURErecordPage 21DC.WELDPROCEDURE.WELD.RDo records indicate weld procedures are being qualified in accordance with 192.225? References: 192.225(a), 192.225(b)#

DC.WELDPROCEDUREprocedurePage 21DC.WELDPROCEDURE.WELDWEATHER.PDoes the process require welding to be protected from weather conditions that would impair the quality of the completed weld? References: 192.303, 192.231#

DC.WELDPROCEDUREprocedurePage 21DC.WELDPROCEDURE.MITERJOINT.PDoes the process prohibit the use of certain miter joints as required by 192.233? References: 192.303, 192.233(a), 192.233(b), 192.233(c)#

DC.WELDPROCEDUREprocedurePage 21DC.WELDPROCEDURE.WELDPREP.PDoes the process require certain preparations for welding, in accordance with 192.235? References: 192.303, 192.235#

DC.DPCrecordPage 21DC.DPC.FLANGE.RDo records indicate flanges and flange accessories meet the requirements of 192.147? References: 192.147(a), 192.147(b), 192.147(c)#

DC.DPCobservationPage 22DC.DPC.FLANGE.ODo flanges and flange accessories meet the requirements of 192.147? References: 192.141, 192.147(a), 192.147(b), 192.147(c)#

DC.DPCobservationPage 22DC.DPC.GDVALVEPLACEMENT.OAre distribution line valves being installed as required of 192.181? References: 192.141, 192.181(a), 192.181(b), 192.181(c)#

DC.MOobservationPage 22DC.MO.MAOPLIMIT.OStart-Stop Procedures During startup or shut-in, is it assured that the pressure limitations on the pipeline were not exceeded? References: 192.605(b)(5)#

DC.MAobservationPage 22DC.MA.MARKING.OAre pipe, valves, and fittings properly marked for identification in accordance with the requirements of 192.63? References: 192.63(a), 192.63(b), 192.63(c), 192.63(d)#

DC.METERREGSVCobservationPage 22DC.METERREGSVC.CUSTMETERREGLOC.OAre meters and service regulators being located consistent with the requirements of 192.353? References: 192.351, 192.353(a), 192.353(b), 192.353(c), 192.353(d)#

DC.METERREGSVCobservationPage 22DC.METERREGSVC.CUSTMETERREGPROT.OAre meters and service regulators being protected from damage consistent with the requirements of 192.355? References: 192.351, 192.355(a), 192.355(b), 192.355(c)#

DC.METERREGSVCobservationPage 23DC.METERREGSVC.CUSTMETERREGINSTALL.OAre meters and service regulators being installed consistent with the requirements of 192.357? References: 192.351, 192.357(a), 192.357(b), 192.357(c), 192.357(d)#

DC.METERREGSVCobservationPage 23DC.METERREGSVC.CUSTMETEROPPRESS.OAre customer meter operating pressures consistent with the requirements of 192.359? References: 192.351, 192.359(a), 192.359(b), 192.359(c)#

DC.METERREGSVCobservationPage 23DC.METERREGSVC.SVCLINEINSTALL.OAre customer service lines being installed consistent with the requirements of 192.361? References: 192.351, 192.361(a), 192.361(b), 192.361(c), 192.361(d), 192.361(e), 192.361(f), 192.361(g)#

DC.METERREGSVCobservationPage 23DC.METERREGSVC.SVCLINEVLVLOCATEREQT.OAre customer service line valves being installed meeting the valve and locations requirements of 192.363 and 192.365? References: 192.351, 192.363(a), 192.363(b), 192.363(c), 192.365(a), 192.365(b), 192.365(c)#

DC.METERREGSVCobservationPage 23DC.METERREGSVC.SVCLINECONNECT.OAre customer service lines being installed with connections meeting the requirements of 192.367 and 192.369? References: 192.351, 192.367(a), 192.367(b), 192.369(a), 192.369(b)#

DC.METERREGSVCobservationPage 23DC.METERREGSVC.SVCLINEMATERIAL.OAre customer service lines being installed constructed appropriately for the types of materials used? References: 192.351, 192.371, 192.373(a), 192.373(b), 192.373(c), 192.375(a), 192.375(b), 192.377#

DC.METERREGSVCobservationPage 23DC.METERREGSVC.NEWSVCLINENOTUSED.OAre new customer service lines not in use configured in accordance with the requirements of 192.379? References: 192.351, 192.379, 192.379(a), 192.379(b), 192.379(c)#

DC.METERREGSVCobservationPage 23DC.METERREGSVC.EXCSFLOWVLVLOCATE.OAre service line excess flow valves located and identified in accordance with the requirements of 192.381? References: 192.351, 192.381(c), 192.381(d), 192.381(e)#

DC.PTrecordPage 24DC.PT.PRESSTESTPLASTIC.RDo records indicate that pressure testing is conducted in accordance with 192.513? References: 192.517(b), 192.513(a), 192.513(b), 192.513(c), 192.513(d)#

DC.PTrecordPage 24DC.PT.SERVICELINE.RDo records indicate that pressure testing is conducted in accordance with 192.511? References: 192.517(b), 192.511(a), 192.511(b), 192.511(c)#

DC.PTLOWPRESSrecordPage 24DC.PTLOWPRESS.PRESSTESTLOWSTRESS.RDo records indicate that pressure testing is conducted in accordance with 192.507? References: 192.517(a), 192.507(a), 192.507(b), 192.507(c)#

DC.PTLOWPRESSrecordPage 24DC.PTLOWPRESS.PRESSTEST100PSIG.RDo records indicate that pressure testing is conducted in accordance with 192.509(a) (except for service lines and plastic pipelines)? References: 192.517(b), 192.509(a), 192.509(b)#

EP.ERGprocedurePage 24EP.ERG.NOTICES.PDoes the emergency plan include procedures for receiving, identifying, and classifying notices of events which need immediate response? References: 192.615(a)(1)#

EP.ERGprocedurePage 24EP.ERG.COMMSYS.PDoes the emergency plan include procedures for establishing and maintaining adequate means of communication with appropriate fire, police, and other public officials? References: 192.615(a), 192.615(a)(2)#

EP.ERGprocedurePage 25EP.ERG.RESPONSE.PDoes the emergency plan include procedures for making a prompt and effective response to a notice of each type of emergency, including gas detected inside or near a building, a fire or explosion near or directly involving a pipeline facility, or a natural disaster? References: 192.615(a), 192.615(a)(3), 192.615(a)(11), 192.615(b)(1)#

EP.ERGprocedurePage 25EP.ERG.READINESS.PDoes the process include procedures for ensuring the availability of personnel, equipment, tools, and materials as needed at the scene of an emergency? References: 192.615(a), 192.615(a)(4)#

EP.ERGprocedurePage 25EP.ERG.PUBLICPRIORITY.PDoes the emergency plan include procedures for taking actions directed toward protecting people first and then property? References: 192.615(a), 192.615(a)(5)#

EP.ERGprocedurePage 25EP.ERG.PRESSREDUCESD.PDoes the emergency plan include procedures for the emergency shutdown or pressure reduction in any section of pipeline system necessary to minimize hazards to life or property? References: 192.615(a), 192.615(a)(6)#

EP.ERGprocedurePage 25EP.ERG.PUBLICHAZ.PDoes the emergency plan include procedures for making safe any actual or potential hazard to life or property? References: 192.605(a), 192.615(a)(7)#

EP.ERGprocedurePage 25EP.ERG.AUTHORITIES.PDoes the emergency plan include procedures for notifying appropriate public officials of gas pipeline emergencies and coordinating with them both planned responses and actual responses during an emergency? References: 192.615(a), 192.615(a)(8)#

EP.ERGprocedurePage 25EP.ERG.NOTIFY911.PDoes the emergency plan define the operator’s designated person(s) (e.g., controller or other personnel) responsible to directly notify 911 or the phone number of appropriate local emergency officials to report emergencies and possible pipeline ruptures to first responder agencies/authorities? References: 192.615(a), 192.615(a)(8)#

EP.ERGrecordPage 25EP.ERG.NOTIFY911.RDo records indicate that immediate and direct notification was made to 911 emergency call centers (or local emergency responder agency) for the communities and jurisdictions in which pipelines were located for situations when an emergency or possible rupture of a pipeline was indicated? References: 192.615(a), 192.615(a)(8)#

EP.ERGprocedurePage 26EP.ERG.OUTAGERESTORE.PDoes the emergency plan include procedures for safely restoring any service outage? References: 192.615(a), 192.615(a)(9)#

EP.ERGprocedurePage 26EP.ERG.INCIDENTACTIONS.PDoes the process include procedures for beginning action under 192.617, if applicable, as soon after the end of the emergency as possible? References: 192.615(a), 192.615(a)(10)#

EP.ERGprocedurePage 26EP.ERG.INCIDENTANALYSIS.PDoes the process include procedures for analyzing accidents and failures, including the selection of samples of the failed facility or equipment for laboratory examination, where appropriate, for the purpose of determining the causes of the failure and minimizing the possibility of recurrence? References: 192.617#

EP.ERGrecordPage 26EP.ERG.INCIDENTANALYSIS.RDo records indicate actions initiated to analyze accidents and failures, including the collection of appropriate samples for laboratory examination to determine the causes of the failure and minimize the possibility of recurrence, in accordance with its procedures? References: 192.605(a), 192.617#

EP.ERGprocedurePage 26EP.ERG.TRAINING.PDoes the process include training of the appropriate operating personnel to assure they are knowledgeable of the emergency procedures and verifying that the training is effective? References: 192.615(b)(2)#

EP.ERGrecordPage 26EP.ERG.TRAINING.RHas the operator trained the appropriate operating personnel on emergency procedures and verified that the training was effective in accordance with its procedures? References: 192.605(a), 192.615(b)(2)#

EP.ERGprocedurePage 26EP.ERG.POSTEVNTREVIEW.PDoes the process include detailed steps for reviewing employee activities to determine whether the procedures were effectively followed in each emergency? References: 192.615(b)(3)#

EP.ERGrecordPage 26EP.ERG.POSTEVNTREVIEW.RDo records indicate review of employee activities to determine whether the procedures were effectively followed in each emergency? References: 192.605(a), 192.615(b)(1), 192.615(b)(3)#

EP.ERGprocedurePage 27EP.ERG.LIAISON.PDoes the process include steps for establishing and maintaining liaison with appropriate fire, police and other public officials and utility owners? References: 192.615(c), 192.615(c)(1), 192.615(c)(2), 192.615(c)(3), 192.615(c)(4), 192.616(c)#

EP.ERGrecordPage 27EP.ERG.LIAISON.RDo records indicate liaisons established and maintained with appropriate fire, police and other public officials and utility owners in accordance with procedures? References: 192.605(a), 192.615(c)(1), 192.615(c)(2), 192.615(c)(3), 192.615(c)(4), 192.616(c)#

MO.GMprocedurePage 27MO.GM.ABANDONPIPE.PDoes the process include adequate requirements for the abandonment and deactivation of pipelines and facilities? References: 192.605(b)(1), 192.727(a), 192.727(b), 192.727(c), 192.727(d), 192.727(e), 192.727(f), 192.727(g)#

FS.FGprocedurePage 27FS.FG.VAULTINSPECT.PWhat are process requirements for inspecting vaults having a volumetric internal content ≥200 cubic feet (5.66 cubic meters) that house pressure regulating/limiting equipment? References: 192.605(b)(1), 192.749(a), 192.749(b), 192.749(c), 192.749(d)#

FS.FGrecordPage 27FS.FG.VAULTINSPECT.RDo records document the adequacy of inspections of all vaults having an internal volume ≥200 cubic feet (5.66 cubic meters) that house pressure regulating/limiting equipment? References: 192.709(c), 192.749(a), 192.749(b), 192.749(c), 192.749(d)#

FS.FGobservationPage 27FS.FG.VAULTINSPECT.OAre inspections of selected vaults with internal volume ≥200 cubic feet (5.66 cubic meters) housing pressure regulating/limiting equipment adequate? References: 192.749(a), 192.749(b), 192.749(c), 192.749(d)#

GDIM.QAprocedurePage 27GDIM.QA.PLANIMPLEMENT.PPlan Implementation - Implement Date Was the plan written and implemented per the requirement of 192.1005 by 08/02/2011? References: 192.1005#

GDIM.RAprocedurePage 28GDIM.RA.SOURCES.PDo the procedures identify or reference the appropriate sources used to determine certain characteristics (e.g., Design, Operating Conditions, Operating Environmental Factors) necessary to assess the threats and risks to the pipeline? References: 192.1007(a)(1)#

GDIM.RAprocedurePage 28GDIM.RA.INFORMATION.PDo the procedures require the consideration of information gained from past design, operations, and maintenance (e.g., O&M activities, field surveys, One-Call system information, excavation damage, etc.)? References: 192.1007(a)(2)#

GDIM.RAprocedurePage 28GDIM.RA.GAPS.PDoes the plan contain procedures to identify additional information that is needed to fill gaps due to missing, inaccurate, or incomplete records? References: 192.1007(a)(3)#

GDIM.RAprocedurePage 28GDIM.RA.INFONEEDS.PDo the procedures specify the means to collect the additional information needed to fill gaps due to missing, inaccurate, or incomplete records (e.g., O&M activities, field surveys, One-Call System, etc.)? References: 192.1007(a)(3)#

GDIM.RArecordPage 28GDIM.RA.INFONEEDS.RDoes the plan list the additional information needed to fill gaps due to missing, inaccurate, or incomplete records? References: 192.1007(a)(3)#

GDIM.RAprocedurePage 28GDIM.RA.NEWPIPEDATA.PDo the procedures require the capture and retention of data on any new pipeline installed? References: 192.1007(a)(5)#

GDIM.RArecordPage 28GDIM.RA.NEWPIPEDATA.RDoes the data required for capture and retention include, at a minimum, the location where the new pipeline is installed and the material from which it is constructed? References: 192.1007(a)(5)#

GDIM.RArecordPage 28GDIM.RA.DEMOKNOWLEDGE.RDo records demonstrate implementation of the element "Knowledge of the System"? References: 192.1007(a)#

GDIM.RArecordPage 29GDIM.RA.DEMOUNDERSTANDING.RHas the operator demonstrated an adequate understanding of the system? References: 192.1007(a)#

GDIM.RAprocedurePage 29GDIM.RA.INFOCONSIDERED.PDid the operator consider the information that was reasonably available to identify existing and potential threats? References: 192.1007(b)#

GDIM.RArecordPage 29GDIM.RA.INFOCONSIDERED.RIdentify Threats - Information Considered In identifying threats did the information considered include all of the required data and information sources? References: 192.1007(b)#

GDIM.RAprocedurePage 29GDIM.RA.OUTSIDESOURCES.PDo the procedures consider, in addition to the operator's own information, data from external sources (e.g. trade associations, government agencies, or other system operators, etc.) to assist in identifying potential threats? References: 192.1007(b)#

GDIM.RAprocedurePage 29GDIM.RA.THREATCATEGORIES.PIdentify Threats - Threats Considered In identifying threats, do the procedures include consideration of all of the required threat categories to each gas distribution pipeline? References: 192.1007(b)#

GDIM.RArecordPage 29GDIM.RA.IMPLEMENTTH.RDo records demonstrate implementation of the element "Identify Threats"? References: 192.1007(b)#

GDIM.RAprocedurePage 29GDIM.RA.RISKRANKING.PDo the procedures contain the method(s) and/or a model used to determine the relative importance of each threat and estimate and rank the risks posed? References: 192.1007(c)#

GDIM.RAprocedurePage 30GDIM.RA.THREATSCONSIDERED.PDo the procedures to evaluate and rank risk consider each applicable current and potential threat? References: 192.1007(c)#

GDIM.RAprocedurePage 30GDIM.RA.LIKELIHOOD.PDo the procedures to evaluate and rank risk consider the likelihood of failure associated with each threat? References: 192.1007(c)#

GDIM.RAprocedurePage 30GDIM.RA.CONSEQUENCE.PDo the procedures to evaluate and rank risk consider the potential consequence of failure for all applicable threats? References: 192.1007(c)#

GDIM.RArecordPage 30GDIM.RA.SUBDIVIDE.RIf subdivision of system occurs, does the plan subdivide the system into regions with similar characteristics and for which similar actions are likely to be effective in reducing risk? References: 192.1007(c)#

GDIM.RArecordPage 30GDIM.RA.RESULTS.RAre the results of the risk ranking supported by the risk evaluation model/method? References: 192.1007(c)#

GDIM.RArecordPage 30GDIM.RA.RESULTSVALIDATION.RDid the operator validate the results generated by the risk evaluation model/method? References: 192.1007(c)#

GDIM.RArecordPage 30GDIM.RA.IMPLEMENTRR.RDo records demonstrate implementation of the element "Evaluate and Rank Risk"? References: 192.1007(c)#

GDIM.PMprocedurePage 30GDIM.PM.IDENTIFYMEASURES.PDoes the plan include procedures to identify when measures, beyond minimum code requirements specified outside of Part 192 Subpart P, are required to reduce risk? References: 192.1007(d)#

GDIM.PMrecordPage 31GDIM.PM.IDENTIFYMEASURES.RWhen measures, beyond minimum code requirements specified outside of Part 192 Subpart P, are required to reduce risk, does the plan identify the measures selected, how they will be implemented, and the risks they are addressing? References: 192.1007(d)#

GDIM.PMprocedurePage 31GDIM.PM.LEAKMANAGEMENT.PDoes the plan include an effective leak management program (unless all leaks are repaired when found)? References: 192.1007(d)#

GDIM.PMrecordPage 31GDIM.PM.IMPLEMENTPM.RDo records demonstrate implementation of the measures, required by Part 192 Subpart P, to reduce risk? References: 192.1007(d)#

GDIM.QAprocedurePage 31GDIM.QA.PERFMEASUREBASELINE.PDoes the plan contain procedures for how the operator established a baseline for each performance measure? References: 192.1007(e)#

GDIM.QArecordPage 31GDIM.QA.PERFMEASUREBASELINE.RDoes the plan establish a baseline for each performance measure? References: 192.1007(e)#

GDIM.QAprocedurePage 31GDIM.QA.PERFMEASUREDATA.PDoes the operator have procedures to collect the data for each performance measure? References: 192.1007(e)#

GDIM.QAprocedurePage 31GDIM.QA.PERFMEASUREMONITOR.PDo the procedures require the operator to monitor each performance measure? References: 192.1007(e)#

GDIM.QAprocedurePage 31GDIM.QA.MEASUREEFFECTIVENESS.PWhen measures are required to reduce risk, does the plan provide/describe what type and/or what specific performance measures will be used to measure effectiveness? References: 192.1007(e)#

GDIM.QArecordPage 32GDIM.QA.IMPLEMENTEV.RDo records demonstrate implementation of the element "Measure Performance, Monitor Results, and Evaluate Effectiveness"? References: 192.1007(e)#

GDIM.CAprocedurePage 32GDIM.CA.PERIODICEVAL.PDo the procedures for periodic evaluation include all of the requirements of 192.1007(f)? References: 192.1007(f)#

GDIM.CArecordPage 32GDIM.CA.PERIODICEVAL.RDo records demonstrate implementation of the element "Periodic Evaluation and Improvement"? References: 192.1007(f)#

GDIM.RRprocedurePage 32GDIM.RR.ANNUALREPORT.PDoes the plan contain or reference procedures for reporting, on an annual basis, the four measures listed in 192.1007(e)(1)(i) through (e)(1)(iv) to PHMSA as part of the annual report required by 191.11 and the State regulatory authority? References: 192.1007(g)#

GDIM.RRrecordPage 32GDIM.RR.SUBMITREPORTS.RHas the operator submitted the required reports? References: 192.1007(g)#

GDIM.RRprocedurePage 32GDIM.RR.MECHANICALFITTING.PAre there procedures to collect information necessary to comply with the reporting requirements of 192.1009? References: 192.1009#

GDIM.QAprocedurePage 33GDIM.QA.RECORDREQUIREMENTS.PAre there procedures specifying which records demonstrating compliance with Subpart P will be maintained for at least 10 years? References: 192.1011#

GDIM.QAprocedurePage 33GDIM.QA.PLANRETENTION.PAre there procedures specifying that copies of superseded integrity management plans will be maintained for at least 10 years? References: 192.1011#

GDIM.QArecordPage 33GDIM.QA.RECORDREQUIREMENTS.RHas the operator maintained the required records? References: 192.1011#

GDIM.QArecordPage 33GDIM.QA.ISSUESIMPL.RHave all issues raised in previous DIMP inspections been satisfactorily addressed? References: 192.1005#

GDIM.RArecordPage 33GDIM.RA.OUTSIDESOURCESIMPL.RHas the operator identified information or data from external sources (e.g. trade associations, operator's consultants, government agencies, other operators, manufacturers, etc.) that may require re- evaluation of threats and risks? References: 192.1007(b)#

GDIM.RArecordPage 33GDIM.RA.GAPSIMPL.RIs missing or incomplete system information and data needed to fill knowledge gaps to assess existing and potential threats being collected? References: 192.1007(a)(3)#

GDIM.RArecordPage 33GDIM.RA.SYSINFONEEDSIMPL.RIs missing or incomplete system information and data using the procedures prescribed in the DIMP plan being collected? References: 192.1007(a)(3)#

GDIM.RArecordPage 34GDIM.RA.OMINFONEEDSIMPL.RHas any new or missing information identified or acquired during normal operations, maintenance, and inspection activities been incorporated into the DIMP plan? References: 192.1007(a)(3)#

GDIM.RArecordPage 34GDIM.RA.NEWPIPEIMPL.RHave required data on any new pipeline installations since August 2, 2011 been captured (e.g., location, wall thickness/SDR, manufacturer, lot/production number)? References: 192.1007(a)(5)#

GDIM.RArecordPage 34GDIM.RA.DATAFORMIMPL.RAre data collection forms used in conjunction with the operator's DIMP plan being fully and accurately completed? References: 192.1007(a)#

GDIM.RArecordPage 34GDIM.RA.SMEIMPL.RIf Subject Matter Experts (SMEs), is their documented knowledge and experience being appropriately used in the DIMP Program? References: 192.1007(a)#

GDIM.RAobservationPage 34GDIM.RA.DEMOUNDERSTANDINGIMPL.ODo operator personnel in the field understand their responsibilities under the DIMP plan? References: 192.1007(a)#

GDIM.RArecordPage 34GDIM.RA.THREATCATEGORIESIMPL.RHas the operator acquired any new information relevant to system knowledge that may affect its threat identification? References: 192.1007(b)#

GDIM.RArecordPage 34GDIM.RA.INFOCONSIDEREDIMPL.RHave any changes occurred that require re- evaluation of threats and risks? References: 192.1007(b)#

GDIM.RArecordPage 34GDIM.RA.IMPLEMENTTHUPDATEIMPL.RIdentify Threats - Implementation (Update) Since the last DIMP plan review by the regulatory agency, has the threat identification and risk assessment been updated based on newly acquired information or data relevant to system knowledge? References: 192.1007(c)#

GDIM.RArecordPage 34GDIM.RA.IMPLEMENTTHUPDATEPLANIMPL.RIf the threat identification and risk evaluation and ranking have been modified, were the revisions made in accordance with the procedure in the DIMP plan? References: 192.1007(c)#

GDIM.RArecordPage 35GDIM.RA.SUBDIVIDEADEQIMPL.RDoes the current subdivision process (grouping of materials, geographic areas, etc.) adequately meet the need to properly evaluate and rank the existing and potential threats to the integrity of the system? References: 192.1007(c)#

GDIM.RArecordPage 35GDIM.RA.SUBDIVIDEUPDATEIMPL.RHave the system subdivisions within the risk evaluation and ranking been added to or modified since the last plan review by the regulatory agency? References: 192.1007(c)#

GDIM.RArecordPage 35GDIM.RA.SUBDIVIDEDIMPIMPL.RIf system subdivisions have been added or modified, was it done in accordance with the procedures described in the DIMP plan? References: 192.1007(c)#

GDIM.RArecordPage 35GDIM.RA.SUBDIVIDERESULTIMPL.RIf system subdivisions have been added or modified, did the new system subdivision result in modifications to the risk evaluation and ranking? References: 192.1007(c)#

GDIM.PMrecordPage 35GDIM.PM.IMPLEMENTPMIMPL.RDoes documentation reviewed demonstrate that measures to reduce risks per the DIMP plan are being implemented? References: 192.1007(d)#

GDIM.PMrecordPage 35GDIM.PM.IMPLEMENTPMCOMPLETEIMPL.RHave any measures to reduce risks resulting in the elimination/mitigation of the associated identified threat been completed (e.g., pipe replacement program completed, etc.)? References: 192.1007(d)#

GDIM.PMrecordPage 35GDIM.PM.IMPLEMENTPMREEVALIMPL.RHave risks been re-evaluated and re-ranked because of the elimination/mitigation of an identified threat? References: 192.1007(d)#

GDIM.PMrecordPage 35GDIM.PM.IMPLEMENTPMSPECIFRISKIMPL.RDoes each implemented risk reduction measure identified in the DIMP plan address a specific risk or group of risks? References: 192.1007(d)#

GDIM.PMrecordPage 35GDIM.PM.LEAKMANAGEMENTIMPL.RCan the operator provide documentation to demonstrate that an effective leak management program is being implemented (answer "N/A" if all leaks are repaired when found)? References: 192.1007(d)#

GDIM.QArecordPage 36GDIM.QA.IMPLEMENTEVDATAIMPL.RIs data being collected for the required performance measures in 192.1007(e)? References: 192.1007(e)#

GDIM.QArecordPage 36GDIM.QA.IMPLEMENTEVDATADIMPIMPL.RMeasure Performance - Implementation (DIMP) Based on field observations and/or record reviews, is the data used to measure performance being accurately collected in accordance with the procedures in its DIMP plan? References: 192.1007(e)#

GDIM.QArecordPage 36GDIM.QA.IMPLEMENTEVBASELINEIMPL.RIs each performance measure being monitored from an established baseline? References: 192.1007(e)#

GDIM.QArecordPage 36GDIM.QA.IMPLEMENTEVRISKIMPL.RIs each performance measure added since the DIMP plan was last updated tied to a specific risk reduction measure or group of measures? References: 192.1007(e)#

GDIM.CArecordPage 36GDIM.CA.PERIODICEVALFREQIMPL.RHave periodic evaluations of the DIMP plan been performed on the frequency specified in the plan? [If a periodic evaluation has not been required since plan implementation or the last inspection, mark questions 27-32 as "N/A".] References: 192.1007(f)#

GDIM.CArecordPage 36GDIM.CA.PERIODICEVALREQTSIMPL.RDid the periodic evaluation include all required elements? References: 192.1007(f)#

GDIM.CArecordPage 36GDIM.CA.PERIODICEVALHIRISKIMPL.RIf any established performance measures indicated an increase in risk beyond an acceptable level (as established in the DIMP plan), were new risk reduction measures implemented along with their associated performance measures? References: 192.1007(f), 192.1007(e)#

GDIM.CArecordPage 36GDIM.CA.PERIODICEVALRISKREDIMPL.RIf the periodic evaluation indicates that implemented measures to reduce risks are NOT effective, were risk reduction measures modified, deleted or added? References: 192.1007(f)#

GDIM.CArecordPage 37GDIM.CA.PERIODICEVALPRFMESIMPL.RDid the periodic evaluation indicate that the selected performance measures are assessing the effectiveness of risk reduction measures, and, if not, were performance measures modified, deleted or added? References: 192.1007(f)#

GDIM.CArecordPage 37GDIM.CA.PERIODICEVALDIMPIMPL.RPeriodic Evaluation - Implementation (DIMP Plan) Were procedures followed in conducting periodic evaluations and program improvements? References: 192.1007(f)#

GDIM.RRrecordPage 37GDIM.RR.SUBMITREPORTSIMPL.RReport Results - Submittal Were Parts C and D of the PHMSA Distribution Annual Report (Form 7100.1-1) completed in the submission to PHMSA and the state regulatory authority having jurisdiction, if required, for each year since the last inspection? References: 192.1007(g)#

GDIM.RRrecordPage 37GDIM.RR.MECHANICALFITTINGDATAIMPL.RHave accurate records been maintained documenting mechanical fitting failures that resulted in hazardous leaks? References: 192.1009, 191.12#

GDIM.RRrecordPage 37GDIM.RR.MECHANICALFITTINGRPTIMPL.RDid the operator report all mechanical fitting failures that resulted in a hazardous leak for the previous calendar year to PHMSA and State authorities, as appropriate, by March 15th of the next calendar year, and did the reports contain the information required by Department of Transportation Form PHMSA F-7100.1-2? References: 192.1009, 191.12#

GDIM.RRobservationPage 37GDIM.RR.MECHANICALFITTINGDIMPIMPL.OMechanical Fitting Failures - Information Collection (DIMP) Were procedure(s) followed for collecting the appropriate information and submitting PHMSA Form F-7100.1-2? References: 192.1009, 191.12#

GDIM.QArecordPage 37GDIM.QA.RECORDREQUIREMENTSIMPL.RAre records retained demonstrating compliance with Subpart P, as specified in its DIMP plan, for 10 years (or since 08/02/2011)? References: 192.1011#

GDIM.QArecordPage 37GDIM.QA.RECORDREQTSRETAINIMPL.RRecords - Implementation (Plan Retention) Were copies of superseded DIMP plans retained for 10 years (or since 08/02/2011)? References: 192.1011#

GDIM.QArecordPage 38GDIM.QA.RECORDREQTSDIMPIMPL.RRecords - Implementation (DIMP) Were DIMP procedures followed as applicable to records retention? References: 192.1011#

GDIM.PIrecordPage 38GDIM.PI.PERIODICINSPDEVAPPRVIMPL.RHas approval been requested or received from PHMSA or the appropriate State Regulatory Authority for alternate (less strict than code) periodic inspection intervals? [If no, mark Subgroup GDIM.IMPL questions 40-44 "N/A".] References: 192.1013(c)#

GDIM.PIrecordPage 38GDIM.PI.PERIODICINSPDEVPERFRMIMPL.RHave the periodic inspections been implemented and have they been conducted at the specified (approved) alternate intervals? References: 192.1013(c)#

GDIM.PIrecordPage 38GDIM.PI.PERIODICINSPDEVREQTIMPL.RHave all conditions been complied with that were required as part of the alternate inspection interval approval? References: 192.1013(c)#

GDIM.PIrecordPage 38GDIM.PI.PERIODICINSPDEVPRFMESIMPL.RDo performance measure records indicate that deviation inspection resources were assigned to higher risk threat(s) and/or that that decreased inspection intervals contributed to an equal or greater overall level of safety has been achieved since the alternate inspection frequency was implemented? References: 192.1013(c)#

GDIM.PIrecordPage 38GDIM.PI.PERIODICINSPDEVACTIONIMPL.RIf that an equal or greater overall level of safety has not been achieved, has corrective action been taken? References: 192.1013(c)#

MO.GOABNORMALrecordPage 38MO.GOABNORMAL.ABNORMALREVIEW.RDo records indicate periodic review of work done by operator personnel to determine the effectiveness of the abnormal operation processes and corrective action taken where deficiencies are found? References: 192.605(a), 192.605(c)(4)#

MO.GOCLASSprocedurePage 39MO.GOCLASS.CLASSLOCATEREV.PDoes the process include a requirement that the MAOP of a pipeline segment be confirmed or revised within 24 months whenever the hoop stress corresponding to the established MAOP is determined not to be commensurate with the existing class location? References: 192.605(b)(1), 192.611(a), 192.611(b), 192.611(c), 192.611(d)#

MO.GOCLASSprocedurePage 39MO.GOCLASS.CLASSLOCATESTUDY.PDoes the process include a requirement that the operator conduct a study whenever an increase in population density indicates a change in the class location of a pipeline segment operating at a hoop stress that is more than 40% SMYS? References: 192.605(b)(1), 192.609(a), 192.609(b), 192.609(c), 192.609(d), 192.609(e), 192.609(f)#

MO.GOCLASSrecordPage 39MO.GOCLASS.CLASSLOCATESTUDY.RDo records indicate performance of the required study whenever the population along a pipeline increased or there was an indication that the pipe hoop stress was not commensurate with the present class location? References: 192.605(b)(1), 192.609(a), 192.609(b), 192.609(c), 192.609(d), 192.609(e), 192.609(f)#

MO.GOMAOPprocedurePage 39MO.GOMAOP.MAOPDETERMINE.PDoes the process include requirements for determining the maximum allowable operating pressure for a pipeline segment in accordance with 192.619? References: 192.605(b)(1), 192.619(a), 192.619(b), 192.621(a), 192.621(b), 192.623(a), 192.623(b)#

MO.GOMAOPrecordPage 39MO.GOMAOP.MAOPDETERMINE.RDo records indicate determination of the MAOP of pipeline segments in accordance with 192.619 and limiting of the operating pressure as required? References: 192.619(a), 192.619(b), 192.621(a), 192.621(b), 192.623(a), 192.623(b)#

MO.GOMAOPprocedurePage 39MO.GOMAOP.MAOPLIMIT.PDoes the process include requirements for starting up and shutting down any part of the pipeline in a manner to assure operation with the MAOP limits, plus the build-up allowed for operation of pressure-limiting and control devices? References: 192.605(a), 192.605(b)(5)#

MO.GMprocedurePage 40MO.GM.ABANDONPIPE.PDoes the process include adequate requirements for the abandonment and deactivation of pipelines and facilities? References: 192.605(b)(1), 192.727(a), 192.727(b), 192.727(c), 192.727(d), 192.727(e), 192.727(f), 192.727(g)#

MO.GMrecordPage 40MO.GM.ABANDONPIPE.RDo records indicate pipelines and facilities were abandoned or deactivated in accordance with requirements? References: 192.709(c), 192.727(a), 192.727(b), 192.727(c), 192.727(d), 192.727(e), 192.727(f), 192.727(g)#

MO.GMprocedurePage 40MO.GM.IGNITION.PAre there processes for minimizing the danger of accidental ignition where gas constitutes a hazard of fire or explosion? References: 192.605(b)(1), 192.751(a), 192.751(b), 192.751(c)#

MO.GMrecordPage 40MO.GM.IGNITION.RDo records indicate personnel followed processes for minimizing the danger of accidental ignition where the presence of gas constituted a hazard of fire or explosion? References: 192.709, 192.751(a), 192.751(b), 192.751(c)#

MO.GMrecordPage 40MO.GM.RECORDS.RDo records indicate that records are maintained of each pipe/"other than pipe" repair, NDT required record, and (as required by subparts L or M) patrol, survey, inspection or test? References: 192.605(b)(1), 192.243(f), 192.709(a), 192.709(b), 192.709(c)#

MO.GMprocedurePage 40MO.GM.DISTVALVEINSPECT.PDoes the process include procedures for inspecting and partially operating each distribution system valve that might be required in an emergency at intervals not exceeding 15 months, but at least once each calendar year and for taking prompt remedial action to correct any valve found inoperable? References: 192.605(b)(1), 192.747(a), 192.747(b)#

MO.GMrecordPage 40MO.GM.DISTVALVEINSPECT.RDo records indicate proper inspection of each distribution system valve that might be required in an emergency at intervals not exceeding 15 months, but at least once each calendar year, and prompt remedial action to correct any valve found inoperable? References: 192.603(b), 192.747(a), 192.747(b)#

MO.GMobservationPage 40MO.GM.DISTVALVEINSPECT.OIs proper inspection being performed for each distribution system valve that might be required in an emergency, and prompt remedial action to correct any valves found inoperable? References: 192.747(a), 192.747(b)#

MO.GMprocedurePage 41MO.GM.BELLSPIGOTJOINT.PDoes the process require that caulked bell and spigot joints be correctly sealed? References: 192.753(a), 192.753(b)#

MO.GMrecordPage 41MO.GM.BELLSPIGOTJOINT.RDo records indicate that caulked bell and spigot joints were correctly sealed? References: 192.603(b), 192.753(a), 192.753(b)#

MO.GMobservationPage 41MO.GM.BELLSPIGOTJOINT.ODo records indicate that caulked bell and spigot joints were correctly sealed? References: 192.753(a), 192.753(b)#

MO.GMprocedurePage 41MO.GM.CASTIRONPROTECT.PDoes the process require adequate protection for segments of a buried cast-iron pipeline for which support has been disturbed? References: 192.755(a), 192.755(b)#

MO.GMobservationPage 41MO.GM.CASTIRONPROTECT.OIs adequate protection in place for segments of a buried cast-iron pipeline for which support has been disturbed? References: 192.755(a), 192.755(b)#

MO.GMprocedurePage 41MO.GM.HOLDER.PDoes the process include systematic and routine testing and inspection of pipe-type or bottle-type holders? References: 192.605(a), 192.605(b)(10)#

MO.GMprocedurePage 41MO.GM.EQUIPPLASTICJOINT.PDoes the process require maintaining equipment used in joining of plastic pipe using heat fusion in accordance with the manufacturer's recommended practices or with written procedures that have been proven by test and experience to produce acceptable joints? References: 192.605(b)(1), 192.756#

MO.GMrecordPage 41MO.GM.EQUIPPLASTICJOINT.RDo records indicate equipment used in joining plastic pipe by heat fusion was maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's recommended practices or with written procedures that have been proven by test and experience to produce acceptable joints? References: 192.603(b), 192.756#

MO.GMobservationPage 42MO.GM.EQUIPPLASTICJOINT.OIs proper maintenance being performed on equipment used in joining plastic pipe by heat fusion in accordance with the manufacturer's recommended practices or with written procedures that have been proven by test and experience to produce acceptable joints? References: 192.756#

MO.GOODORprocedurePage 42MO.GOODOR.ODORIZE.PDoes the process ensure appropriate odorant levels are contained in its combustible gases in accordance with 192.625? References: 192.605(b)(1), 192.625(a), 192.625(b), 192.625(c), 192.625(d), 192.625(e), 192.625(f)#

MO.GOODORrecordPage 42MO.GOODOR.ODORIZE.RDo records indicate appropriate odorization of its combustible gases in accordance with its processes and conduct of the required testing to verify odorant levels met requirements? References: 192.709(c), 192.625(a), 192.625(b), 192.625(c), 192.625(d), 192.625(e), 192.625(f)#

MO.GOODORobservationPage 42MO.GOODOR.ODORIZE.OIs sampling of combustible gases adequate using an instrument capable of determining the percentage of gas in air at which it becomes readily detectable? References: 192.625(a), 192.625(c), 192.625(d), 192.625(e), 192.625(f)#

MO.GOprocedurePage 42MO.GO.CONTSURVEILLANCE.PAre there processes for performing continuing surveillance of pipeline facilities, and also for reconditioning, phasing out, or reducing the MAOP in a pipeline segment that is determined to be in unsatisfactory condition but on which no immediate hazard exists? References: 192.605(e), 192.613(a), 192.613(b), 192.703(b), 192.703(c)#

MO.GOprocedurePage 42MO.GO.PURGE.PDoes the process include requirements for purging of pipelines in accordance with 192.629? References: 192.605(b)(1), 192.629(a), 192.629(b)#

MO.GOobservationPage 42MO.GO.PURGE.OAre lines being purged in accordance with 192.629? References: 192.629(a), 192.629(b)#

MO.GOprocedurePage 43MO.GO.OMANNUALREVIEW.PDoes the process include a requirement to review the manual at intervals not exceeding 15 months, but at least once each calendar year? References: 192.605(a)#

MO.GOrecordPage 43MO.GO.OMANNUALREVIEW.RHave annual reviews of the written procedures or processes in the manual been conducted as required? References: 192.605(a)#

MO.GOprocedurePage 43MO.GO.OMEFFECTREVIEW.PDoes the process include requirements for periodically reviewing the work done by operator personnel to determine the effectiveness, and adequacy of the processes used in normal operations and maintenance and modifying the processes when deficiencies are found? References: 192.605(a), 192.605(b)(8)#

MO.GOrecordPage 43MO.GO.OMEFFECTREVIEW.RDo records indicate periodic review of the work done by operator personnel to determine the effectiveness, and adequacy of the processes used in normal operations and maintenance and modifying the processes when deficiencies are found? References: 192.605(a), 192.605(b)(8)#

MO.GOprocedurePage 43MO.GO.OMHISTORY.PDoes the process include requirements for making construction records, maps and operating history available to appropriate operating personnel? References: 192.605(a), 192.605(b)(3)#

MO.GOrecordPage 43MO.GO.OMHISTORY.RAre construction records, maps and operating history available to appropriate operating personnel? References: 192.605(a), 192.605(b)(3)#

MO.GOprocedurePage 43MO.GO.SRC.PDoes the process include instructions enabling personnel who perform operation and maintenance activities to recognize conditions that may potentially be safety-related conditions? References: 192.605(a), 192.605(d), 191.23(a)#

MO.GOprocedurePage 43MO.GO.CUSTNOTIFY.PIs a customer notification process in place that satisfies the requirements of 192.16? References: 192.13(c), 192.16(a), 192.16(b), 192.16(c), 192.16(d)#

MO.GOrecordPage 44MO.GO.CUSTNOTIFY.RDo records indicate the customer notification process satisfies the requirements of 192.16? References: 192.16(d), 192.16(a), 192.16(b), 192.16(c)#

MO.GOprocedurePage 44MO.GO.EFVINSTALL.PIs there an adequate excess flow valve (EFV) installation and performance program in place? References: 192.383(b), 192.381(a), 192.381(b), 192.381(c), 192.381(d), 192.381(e), 192.383(a), 192.383(c)#

MO.GOprocedurePage 44MO.GO.ODDOR.PDoes the process require prompt response to the report of a gas odor inside or near a building? References: 192.605(a), 192.605(b)(11)#

MO.GMOPPprocedurePage 44MO.GMOPP.PRESSREGCAP.PDoes the process include procedures for ensuring that the capacity of each pressure relief device at pressure limiting stations and pressure regulating stations is sufficient? References: 192.605(b)(1), 192.743(a), 192.743(b), 192.743(c)#

MO.GMOPPrecordPage 44MO.GMOPP.PRESSREGCAP.RDo records indicate testing or review of the capacity of each pressure relief device at each pressure limiting station and pressure regulating station as required? References: 192.709(c), 192.743(a), 192.743(b), 192.743(c)#

MO.GMOPPprocedurePage 44MO.GMOPP.PRESSREGTEST.PDoes the process include procedures for inspecting and testing each pressure limiting station, relief device, and pressure regulating station and their equipment? References: 192.605(b)(1), 192.739(a), 192.739(b)#

MO.GMOPPrecordPage 44MO.GMOPP.PRESSREGTEST.RDo records indicate inspection and testing of pressure limiting, relief devices, and pressure regulating stations? References: 192.709(c), 192.739(a), 192.739(b)#

MO.GMOPPobservationPage 45MO.GMOPP.PRESSREGTEST.OAre field or bench tests or inspections of regulating stations, pressure limiting stations or relief devices adequate? References: 192.739(a), 192.739(b)#

MO.GMOPPprocedurePage 45MO.GMOPP.PRESSREGMETER.PDoes the process require telemetering or recording gauges be utilized as required for distribution systems? References: 192.605(b)(1), 192.741(a), 192.741(b), 192.741(c)#

MO.GMOPPobservationPage 45MO.GMOPP.PRESSREGMETER.OAre telemetering or recording gauges properly utilized as required for distribution systems? References: 192.741(a), 192.741(b), 192.741(c)#

MO.GMrecordPage 45MO.GM.RECORDS.RDo records indicate that records are maintained of each pipe/"other than pipe" repair, NDT required record, and (as required by subparts L or M) patrol, survey, inspection or test? References: 192.605(b)(1), 192.243(f), 192.709(a), 192.709(b), 192.709(c)#

MO.RWprocedurePage 45MO.RW.TRANSPATROL.PDoes the process adequately cover the requirements for transmission line patrolling the ROW and conditions reported? References: 192.705(a), 192.705(b), 192.705(c)#

MO.RWrecordPage 45MO.RW.TRANSPATROL.RDo records indicate that transmission line ROW surface conditions have been patrolled as required? References: 192.709(c), 192.705(a), 192.705(b), 192.705(c)#

MO.RWprocedurePage 45MO.RW.TRANSLEAKAGE.PDoes the process require transmission leakage surveys to be conducted? References: 192.706, 192.706(a), 192.706(b)#

MO.RWrecordPage 45MO.RW.TRANSLEAKAGE.RDo records indicate transmission leakage surveys conducted as required? References: 192.709(c), 192.706, 192.706(a), 192.706(b)#

MO.RWprocedurePage 46MO.RW.BUSINESSDIST.PDo the procedures define a “Business District”? References: 192.723(b)(1), 192.721(b)(1), 192.723(a), 192.613#

MO.RWrecordPage 46MO.RW.BUSINESSDIST.RDo the records clearly identify the areas of operator's distribution system that are considered Business Districts? References: 192.723(b)(1), 192.721(b)(1), 192.723(a), 192.613#

MO.RWobservationPage 46MO.RW.BUSINESSDIST.ODo field observations indicate Business Districts are properly identified? References: 192.723(b)(1), 192.721(b)(1), 192.723(a), 192.613#

MO.RWprocedurePage 46MO.RW.DISTPATROL.PDoes the process require distribution system patrolling to be conducted? References: 192.721(a), 192.721(b)#

MO.RWrecordPage 46MO.RW.DISTPATROL.RDo records indicate distribution patrolling was conducted as required? References: 192.603(b), 192.721(a), 192.721(b)#

MO.RWprocedurePage 46MO.RW.DISTLEAKAGE.PDoes the process require distribution system leakage surveys to be conducted? References: 192.723(a), 192.723(b)#

MO.RWrecordPage 46MO.RW.DISTPATROLLEAKAGE.RDo records indicate distribution leakage surveys were conducted as required? References: 192.603(b), 192.723(a), 192.723(b)#

MO.RWprocedurePage 46MO.RW.ROWMARKER.PDoes the process adequately cover the requirements for placement of ROW markers? References: 192.707(a), 192.707(b), 192.707(d)#

MO.RWobservationPage 46MO.RW.ROWMARKER.OAre line markers placed and maintained as required? References: 192.707(a), 192.707(b), 192.707(d)#

MO.RWobservationPage 47MO.RW.ROWMARKERABOVE.OAre line markers placed and maintained as required for above ground pipelines? References: 192.707(c)#

MO.GOUPRATErecordPage 47MO.GOUPRATE.MAOPINCREASE.RDo records indicate that increases in MAOP of pipeline were determined in accordance with 192.553? References: 192.553(a), 192.553(b), 192.553(c)#

MO.GOUPRATErecordPage 47MO.GOUPRATE.MAOPINCREASELIMIT.RDo records indicate that increases in MAOP are limited in accordance with 192.619 and 192.621? References: 192.553(b), 192.553(c), 192.553(d), 192.557(a)#

MO.GOUPRATErecordPage 47MO.GOUPRATE.MAOPINCREASEPREP.RDo records indicate that increases in MAOP were preceded by the actions specified in 192.557? References: 192.553(b), 192.553(c), 192.553(a), 192.557(b), 192.557(c)#

MO.GOUPRATErecordPage 47MO.GOUPRATE.MAOPINCREASECASTDUCTILE.RDo records indicate that requirements were followed for increasing the MAOP for cast iron or ductile iron pipe where records are inadequate for evaluating the level of safety of the pipeline when operating at the proposed increased pressure? References: 192.553(b), 192.553(c), 192.557(d)#

MMLPGIM.QAprocedurePage 47MMLPGIM.QA.PLANIMPLEMENT.PPlan Implementation - Implement Date Was the plan written and implemented per the requirement of 192.1015 by 08/02/2011? References: 192.1015(a)#

MMLPGIM.RAprocedurePage 48MMLPGIM.RA.INFORMATION.PDoes the plan include an explanation of the mechanisms or procedures to address how the operator will demonstrate knowledge of its pipeline which, to the extent known, should include the approximate location and material of its pipeline? References: 192.1015(b)(1)#

MMLPGIM.RAprocedurePage 48MMLPGIM.RA.GAPS.PDoes the plan include an explanation of the mechanisms or procedures to identify additional information that is needed to fill gaps due to missing, inaccurate, or incomplete records? References: 192.1015(b)(1)#

MMLPGIM.RAprocedurePage 48MMLPGIM.RA.INFONEEDS.PDo the written mechanisms or procedures specify the means to collect the additional information over time through normal activities conducted on the pipeline (e.g. design, construction, operations or maintenance activities)? References: 192.1015(b)(1)#

MMLPGIM.RArecordPage 48MMLPGIM.RA.INFONEEDS.RDoes the plan list the additional information needed to fill gaps due to missing, inaccurate, or incomplete records? References: 192.1015(b)(1)#

MMLPGIM.RAprocedurePage 48MMLPGIM.RA.NEWPIPEDATA.PDo the written mechanisms or procedures require the capture and retention of data on any new pipeline installed? References: 192.1015(c)(3)#

MMLPGIM.RArecordPage 48MMLPGIM.RA.NEWPIPEDATA.RDoes the captured and retained data on any new pipeline include, at a minimum, the location where the new pipeline is installed and the material from which it is constructed? References: 192.1015(c)(3)#

MMLPGIM.RArecordPage 48MMLPGIM.RA.DEMOUNDERSTANDING.RHas the operator demonstrated an adequate understanding of the system, which, to the extent known, should include the approximate location and material of its pipelines? References: 192.1015(b)(1)#

MMLPGIM.RArecordPage 49MMLPGIM.RA.INFOCONSIDERED.RDid the operator consider the information that was reasonably available to identify existing and potential threats? References: 192.1015(b)(2)#

MMLPGIM.RAprocedurePage 49MMLPGIM.RA.THREATCATEGORIES.PIdentify Threats - Threats Considered In identifying threats, do the written mechanisms or procedures include consideration of all of the required categories of threats to each gas distribution pipeline? References: 192.1015(b)(2)#

MMLPGIM.RArecordPage 49MMLPGIM.RA.IMPLEMENTTH.RDo records demonstrate implementation of the element "Identify Threats"? References: 192.1015(b)(2)#

MMLPGIM.RAprocedurePage 49MMLPGIM.RA.RISKRANKING.PDo the written mechanisms or procedures contain the method(s) and/or a model used to determine the relative importance of each threat and estimate and rank the risks posed? References: 192.1015(b)(3)#

MMLPGIM.RArecordPage 49MMLPGIM.RA.RESULTSVALIDATION.RRank Risk - Validation Were the results generated by the risk evaluation model/method validated? References: 192.1015(b)(3)#

MMLPGIM.RArecordPage 49MMLPGIM.RA.IMPLEMENTRR.RDo records demonstrate implementation of the element "Evaluate and Rank Risk"? References: 192.1015(b)(3)#

MMLPGIM.PMprocedurePage 50MMLPGIM.PM.IDENTIFYMEASURES.PDo the written mechanisms or procedures identify when measures, beyond minimum code requirements specified outside of Part 192 Subpart P, are required to reduce risk? References: 192.1015(b)(4)#

MMLPGIM.PMrecordPage 50MMLPGIM.PM.IDENTIFYMEASURES.RWhen measures, beyond minimum code requirements specified outside of Part 192 Subpart P, are required to reduce risk, does the plan identify the measures selected, how they will be implemented, and the risks they are addressing? References: 192.1015(b)(4)#

MMLPGIM.PMrecordPage 50MMLPGIM.PM.IMPLEMENTPM.RDo records demonstrate implementation of those measures to reduce risk required by Part 192 Subpart P? References: 192.1015(b)(4)#

MMLPGIM.QAprocedurePage 50MMLPGIM.QA.PERFMEASUREMONITOR.PDoes the plan contain written mechanisms or procedures for how the operator monitors the performance measure "number of leaks eliminated or repaired on its pipeline and their causes"? References: 192.1015(b)(5)#

MMLPGIM.QArecordPage 50MMLPGIM.QA.PERFMEASUREMONITOR.RDid the operator monitor the performance measure "number of leaks eliminated or repaired on its pipeline and their causes"? References: 192.1015(b)(5)#

MMLPGIM.CAprocedurePage 50MMLPGIM.CA.EVALUATIONPERIOD.PDo the written mechanisms or procedures provide for determination of the appropriate period for conducting IM program evaluations based on the complexity of its pipeline and changes in factors affecting the risk of failure, not to exceed 5 years? References: 192.1015(b)(6)#

MMLPGIM.CAprocedurePage 51MMLPGIM.CA.PERIODICEVALUATION.PDo the written mechanisms or procedures consider the results of the performance monitoring in the periodic IM program evaluation? References: 192.1015(b)(6), 192.1015(b)(5)#

MMLPGIM.CArecordPage 51MMLPGIM.CA.PERIODICEVALUATION.RDo records demonstrate implementation of the element "Periodic Evaluation and Improvement"? References: 192.1015(b)(6), 192.1015(b)(5)#

MMLPGIM.QAprocedurePage 51MMLPGIM.QA.PLANRETENTION.PAre there written mechanisms or procedures specifying that a written IM plan in accordance with 192.1015, including superseded IM plans, will be maintained for at least 10 years? References: 192.1015(c)(1)#

MMLPGIM.QAprocedurePage 51MMLPGIM.QA.THREATIDRECORDS.PAre there written mechanisms or procedures specifying that documents demonstrating compliance to support threat identification will be maintained for at least 10 years? References: 192.1015(c)(2)#

MMLPGIM.QAprocedurePage 51MMLPGIM.QA.SYSTEMRECORDS.PAre there written mechanisms or procedures specifying that documentation will be maintained for at least 10 years showing the location and material of all pipe and appurtenances that are installed after the effective date of the operator's IM program and, to the extent known, the location and material of all pipe and appurtenances that were existing on the effective date of the operator's program? References: 192.1015(c)(3)#

MMLPGIM.QArecordPage 51MMLPGIM.QA.RECORDREQUIREMENTS.RHas the operator maintained the required records? References: 192.1015(c)#

PD.DPprocedurePage 52PD.DP.PDPROGRAM.PIs a damage prevention program approved and in place? References: 192.614(a)#

PD.DPprocedurePage 52PD.DP.ONECALL.PDoes the process require participation in qualified one-call systems? References: 192.614(b)#

PD.DPprocedurePage 52PD.DP.EXCAVATEMARK.PDoes the process require marking proposed excavation sites to the Common Ground Alliance's (CGA) Best Practices or the use of more stringent and accurate requirements? References: 192.614(c)(5)#

PD.DPprocedurePage 52PD.DP.TPD.PDoes the process specify how reports of Third-Party Activity and names of associated contractors or excavators are input back into the mail-outs and communications with excavators along the system? References: 192.614(c)(1)#

PD.DPprocedurePage 52PD.DP.TPDONECALL.PDoes the process specify how reports of TPD are checked against One-Call tickets? References: 192.614(c)(3)#

PD.DPobservationPage 52PD.DP.ONECALL.OParticipation in Qualified One Call Systems Observe operator process a "One Call" ticket. References: 192.614(c)(3)#

PD.DPrecordPage 52PD.DP.PDPROGRAM.RDoes the damage prevention program meet minimum requirements specified in 192.614(c)? References: 192.614(c)#

PD.PAprocedurePage 52PD.PA.PROGRAM.PHas the continuing public education (awareness) program been established as required? References: 192.616(a), 192.616(h)#

PD.PAprocedurePage 53PD.PA.MGMTSUPPORT.PDoes the operator's program documentation demonstrate management support? References: 192.616(a)#

PD.PAprocedurePage 53PD.PA.ASSETS.PDoes the program clearly identify the specific pipeline systems and facilities to be included in the program, along with the unique attributes and characteristics of each? References: 192.616(b)#

PD.PAprocedurePage 53PD.PA.AUDIENCEID.PDoes the program establish methods to identify the individual stakeholders in the four affected stakeholder audience groups: (1) affected public, (2) emergency officials, (3) local public officials, and (4) excavators, as well as affected municipalities, school districts, businesses, and residents? References: 192.616(d), 192.616(e), 192.616(f)#

PD.PArecordPage 53PD.PA.AUDIENCEID.RDo records identify the individual stakeholders in the four affected stakeholder audience groups: (1) affected public, (2) emergency officials, (3) local public officials, and (4) excavators, as well as affected municipalities, school districts, businesses, and residents to which it sends public awareness materials and messages? References: 192.616(d), 192.616(e), 192.616(f)#

PD.PAprocedurePage 53PD.PA.MESSAGES.PDoes the program define the combination of messages, delivery methods, and delivery frequencies to comprehensively reach all affected stakeholder audiences in all areas where gas is transported? References: 192.616(c)#

PD.PAprocedurePage 53PD.PA.SUPPLEMENTAL.PConsideration of Supplemental Enhancements Were relevant factors considered to determine the need for supplemental public awareness program enhancements for each stakeholder audience, as described in API RP 1162? References: 192.616(c)#

PD.PArecordPage 53PD.PA.EDUCATE.RDid delivered messages specifically include provisions to educate the public, emergency officials, local public officials, and excavators on: (1) Use of a one-call notification system prior to excavation and other damage prevention activities; (2) Possible hazards associated with unintended releases from a gas pipeline facility; (3) Physical indications of a possible release; (4) Steps to be taken for public safety in the event of a gas pipeline release; and (5) Procedures to report such an event? References: 192.616(d), 192.616(f)#

PD.PArecordPage 53PD.PA.LOCATIONMESSAGE.RMessages on Pipeline Facility Locations Were messages developed and delivered to advise affected municipalities, school districts, businesses, and residents of pipeline facility locations? References: 192.616(e), 192.616(f)#

PD.PArecordPage 54PD.PA.MESSAGEFREQUENCY.RDid the delivery of materials and messages meet or exceed the baseline delivery frequencies specified in API RP 1162, Table 2-1 through Table 2.3? References: 192.616(c)#

EP.ERGrecordPage 54EP.ERG.LIAISON.RDo records indicate liaisons established and maintained with appropriate fire, police and other public officials and utility owners in accordance with procedures? References: 192.605(a), 192.615(c)(1), 192.615(c)(2), 192.615(c)(3), 192.615(c)(4), 192.616(c)#

PD.PAprocedurePage 54PD.PA.LANGUAGE.PDoes the program require that materials and messages be provided in other languages commonly understood by a significant number and concentration of non-English speaking populations in the operator's areas? References: 192.616(g)#

PD.PArecordPage 54PD.PA.LANGUAGE.ROther Languages Were materials and messages developed and delivered in other languages commonly understood by a significant number and concentration of non-English speaking populations in the operator's areas? References: 192.616(g)#

PD.PAprocedurePage 54PD.PA.EVALPLAN.PDoes the program include a process that specifies how program implementation and effectiveness will be periodically evaluated? References: 192.616(i), 192.616(c)#

PD.PArecordPage 54PD.PA.EVALIMPL.RHas an audit or review of the operator's program implementation been performed annually since the program was developed? References: 192.616(c), 192.616(i)#

PD.PArecordPage 54PD.PA.AUDITMETHODS.RAcceptable Methods for Program Implementation Audits Was one or more of the three acceptable methods (i.e., internal assessment, 3rd-party contractor review, or regulatory inspections) used to complete the annual audit or review of program implementation? References: 192.616(c), 192.616(i)#

PD.PArecordPage 54PD.PA.PROGRAMIMPROVE.RProgram Changes and Improvements Were changes made to improve the program and/or the implementation process based on the results and findings of the annual audit(s)? References: 192.616(c)#

PD.PArecordPage 55PD.PA.EVALEFFECTIVENESS.RHave effectiveness evaluation(s) of the program been performed for all stakeholder groups in all notification areas along all systems covered by the program? References: 192.616(c)#

PD.PArecordPage 55PD.PA.MEASUREOUTREACH.RMeasure Program Outreach In evaluating effectiveness, was actual program outreach for each stakeholder audience tracked? References: 192.616(c)#

PD.PArecordPage 55PD.PA.MEASUREUNDERSTANDABILITY.RMeasure Understandability of Message Content In evaluating program effectiveness, was the percentage of each stakeholder audience that understood and retained the key information from the messages determined? References: 192.616(c)#

PD.PArecordPage 55PD.PA.MEASUREBEHAVIOR.RMeasure Desired Stakeholder Behavior In evaluating program effectiveness, was evaluation made of whether appropriate preventive, response, and mitigative behaviors were understood and likely to be exhibited? References: 192.616(c)#

PD.PArecordPage 55PD.PA.MEASUREBOTTOM.RMeasure Bottom-Line Results Were bottom-line results of the program measured by tracking third-party incidents and consequences including: (1) near misses, (2) excavation damages resulting in pipeline failures, (3) excavation damages that do not result in pipeline failures? References: 192.616(c)#

PD.PArecordPage 55PD.PA.CHANGES.RProgram Changes Were needed changes and/or modifications to the program identified and documented based on the results and findings of the program effectiveness evaluations? References: 192.616(c)#

PD.PAprocedurePage 55PD.PA.MSTRMETER.PDoes the public awareness program for a master meter or petroleum gas system meet the requirements of Part 192? References: 192.616(j), 192.616(h)#

PD.PArecordPage 55PD.PA.MSTRMETER.RDo records indicate the public awareness program for a master meter or petroleum gas system operator has met the requirements of Part 192? References: 192.616(j), 192.616(h)#

MO.RWprocedurePage 56MO.RW.TRANSPATROL.PDoes the process adequately cover the requirements for transmission line patrolling the ROW and conditions reported? References: 192.705(a), 192.705(b), 192.705(c)#

MO.RWrecordPage 56MO.RW.TRANSPATROL.RDo records indicate that transmission line ROW surface conditions have been patrolled as required? References: 192.709(c), 192.705(a), 192.705(b), 192.705(c)#

MO.RWprocedurePage 56MO.RW.TRANSLEAKAGE.PDoes the process require transmission leakage surveys to be conducted? References: 192.706, 192.706(a), 192.706(b)#

MO.RWrecordPage 56MO.RW.TRANSLEAKAGE.RDo records indicate transmission leakage surveys conducted as required? References: 192.709(c), 192.706, 192.706(a), 192.706(b)#

MO.RWprocedurePage 56MO.RW.DISTPATROL.PDoes the process require distribution system patrolling to be conducted? References: 192.721(a), 192.721(b)#

MO.RWrecordPage 56MO.RW.DISTPATROL.RDo records indicate distribution patrolling was conducted as required? References: 192.603(b), 192.721(a), 192.721(b)#

MO.RWprocedurePage 56MO.RW.DISTLEAKAGE.PDoes the process require distribution system leakage surveys to be conducted? References: 192.723(a), 192.723(b)#

MO.RWrecordPage 56MO.RW.DISTPATROLLEAKAGE.RDo records indicate distribution leakage surveys were conducted as required? References: 192.603(b), 192.723(a), 192.723(b)#

MO.RWprocedurePage 56MO.RW.ROWMARKER.PDoes the process adequately cover the requirements for placement of ROW markers? References: 192.707(a), 192.707(b), 192.707(d)#

MO.RWobservationPage 57MO.RW.ROWMARKER.OAre line markers placed and maintained as required? References: 192.707(a), 192.707(b), 192.707(d)#

MO.RWobservationPage 57MO.RW.ROWMARKERABOVE.OAre line markers placed and maintained as required for above ground pipelines? References: 192.707(c)#

RPT.RRrecordPage 57RPT.RR.ANNUALREPORT.RHave complete and accurate Annual Reports been submitted? References: 191.11(a)#

RPT.RRprocedurePage 57RPT.RR.IMMEDREPORT.PIs there a process to immediately report incidents to the National Response Center? References: 191.5(b), 191.7(a), 191.7(d)#

RPT.RRrecordPage 57RPT.RR.IMMEDREPORT.RDo records indicate immediate notifications of incidents were made in accordance with 191.5? References: 191.5(a), 191.7(a), 191.7(d)#

RPT.RRprocedurePage 57RPT.RR.INCIDENTREPORT.PDoes the process require preparation and filing of an incident report as soon as practicable but no later than 30 days after discovery of a reportable incident? References: 191.9(a)#

GDIM.RRrecordPage 57GDIM.RR.MECHANICALFITTINGDATAIMPL.RHave accurate records been maintained documenting mechanical fitting failures that resulted in hazardous leaks? References: 192.1009, 191.12#

RPT.RRprocedurePage 57RPT.RR.INCIDENTREPORTSUPP.PDoes the process require preparation and filing of supplemental incident reports? References: 191.9(b)#

RPT.RRrecordPage 58RPT.RR.INCIDENTREPORT.RDo records indicate reportable incidents were identified and reports were submitted to DOT on Form 7100.1 within the required time frame? References: 191.9(a)#

RPT.RRrecordPage 58RPT.RR.INCIDENTREPORTSUPP.RDo records indicate accurate supplemental incident reports were filed and within the required timeframe? References: 191.9(b)#

RPT.RRprocedurePage 58RPT.RR.SRCR.PDo the procedures require reporting of safety-related conditions? References: 192.605(a), 191.23(a), 191.23(b), 191.25(a), 191.25(c)#

RPT.RRrecordPage 58RPT.RR.SRCR.RDo records indicate safety-related condition reports were filed as required? References: 191.23(a), 191.23(b), 191.25(a), 191.25(c)#

RPT.RRprocedurePage 58RPT.RR.OPID.PDoes the process require the obtaining, and appropriate control, of Operator Identification Numbers (OPIDs), including changes in entity, acquisition/divestiture, and construction/update/uprate? References: 191.22(a), 191.22(c), 191.22(d)#

RPT.RRrecordPage 58RPT.RR.OPID.RDo records indicate appropriate control of Operator Identification Numbers (OPIDs), including changes in entity, acquisition/divestiture, and construction/update/uprate, and the National Registry of Pipeline and LNG Operators has been notified of applicable changes? References: 191.22(a), 191.22(c), 191.22(d)#

TD.ATMprocedurePage 58TD.ATM.ATMCORRODE.PDoes the process give adequate guidance identifying atmospheric corrosion and for protecting above ground pipe from atmospheric corrosion? References: 192.605(b)(2), 192.479(a), 192.479(b), 192.479(c)#

TD.ATMprocedurePage 58TD.ATM.ATMCORRODEINSP.PDoes the process give adequate instruction for the inspection of aboveground pipeline segments, including inside meter and pressure regulator installations, for atmospheric corrosion? References: 192.605(b)(2), 192.481(a), 192.481(b), 192.481(c)#

TD.ATMrecordPage 59TD.ATM.ATMCORRODEINSP.RDo records document inspection of aboveground pipe for atmospheric corrosion? References: 192.491(c), 192.481(a), 192.481(b), 192.481(c)#

TD.ATMobservationPage 59TD.ATM.ATMCORRODEINSP.ODo field observations confirm pipe exposed to atmospheric corrosion is protected? References: 192.481(b), 192.481(c), 192.479(a), 192.479(b), 192.479(c)#

TD.CPMONITORrecordPage 59TD.CPMONITOR.CURRENTTEST.RDo records document details of electrical checks of sources of rectifiers or other impressed current sources? References: 192.491(c), 192.465(b)#

TD.CPMONITORobservationPage 59TD.CPMONITOR.MONITORCRITERIA.OAre methods used for taking CP monitoring readings that allow for the application of appropriate CP monitoring criteria? References: 192.465(a), 192.463(b), 192.463(c), 192.463(a)#

TD.CPMONITORprocedurePage 59TD.CPMONITOR.TEST.PDoes the process adequately describe how to monitor CP that has been applied to pipelines? References: 192.605(b)(2), 192.465(a)#

TD.CPMONITORrecordPage 59TD.CPMONITOR.TEST.RDo records adequately document cathodic protection monitoring tests have occurred as required? References: 192.491(c), 192.465(a)#

TD.CPMONITORprocedurePage 59TD.CPMONITOR.CURRENTTEST.PDoes the process give sufficient details for making electrical checks of rectifiers or impressed current sources? References: 192.605(b)(2), 192.465(b)#

TD.CPMONITORobservationPage 59TD.CPMONITOR.CURRENTTEST.ODo field observations confirm impressed current sources are properly maintained and are functioning properly? References: 192.465(b)#

TD.CPMONITORprocedurePage 60TD.CPMONITOR.REVCURRENTTEST.PDoes the process give sufficient details for making electrical checks of interference bonds, diodes, and reverse current switches? References: 192.605(b)(2), 192.465(c)#

TD.CPMONITORrecordPage 60TD.CPMONITOR.REVCURRENTTEST.RDo records document details of electrical checks interference bonds, diodes, and reverse current switches? References: 192.491(c), 192.465(c)#

TD.CPMONITORprocedurePage 60TD.CPMONITOR.DEFICIENCY.PDoes the process require that the operator promptly correct any identified deficiencies in corrosion control? References: 192.605(b)(2), 192.465(d)#

TD.CPMONITORrecordPage 60TD.CPMONITOR.DEFICIENCY.RDo records adequately document actions taken to correct any identified deficiencies in corrosion control? References: 192.491(c), 192.465(d)#

TD.CPMONITORprocedurePage 60TD.CPMONITOR.TESTSTATION.PDoes the process contain provisions to assure that each pipeline has sufficient test stations or other contact points to determine the adequacy of cathodic protection? References: 192.469#

TD.CPMONITORrecordPage 60TD.CPMONITOR.TESTSTATION.RDo records identify the location of test stations and show a sufficient number of test stations? References: 192.469#

TD.CPMONITORobservationPage 60TD.CPMONITOR.TESTSTATION.ODo cathodically protected pipelines have a sufficient number of test stations? References: 192.469#

TD.CPMONITORprocedurePage 60TD.CPMONITOR.TESTLEAD.PDoes the process provide adequate instructions for the installation of test leads? References: 192.605(b)(2), 192.471(a), 192.471(b), 192.471(c)#

TD.CPMONITORrecordPage 60TD.CPMONITOR.TESTLEAD.RDo records document that pipelines with cathodic protection have electrical test leads installed in accordance with requirements of Subpart I? References: 192.491(c), 192.471(a), 192.471(b), 192.471(c)#

TD.CPMONITORobservationPage 61TD.CPMONITOR.TESTLEAD.ODo pipelines with cathodic protection have electrical test leads installed in accordance with requirements of Subpart I? References: 192.471(a)#

TD.CPMONITORprocedurePage 61TD.CPMONITOR.INTFRCURRENT.PDoes the operator have a program in place to minimize detrimental effects of interference currents on its pipeline system and does the process for designing and installing cathodic protection systems provide for the minimization of detrimental effects of interference currents on existing adjacent metallic structures? References: 192.605(b)(2), 192.473(a)#

TD.CPMONITORrecordPage 61TD.CPMONITOR.INTFRCURRENT.RDo records document an effective program is in place to minimize detrimental effects of interference currents and that detrimental effects of interference currents from CP systems on other underground metallic structures are minimized? References: 192.491(c), 192.473(a)#

TD.CPMONITORobservationPage 61TD.CPMONITOR.INTFRCURRENT.OAre areas of potential stray current identified, and if found, the detrimental effects of stray currents minimized? References: 192.473(a)#

TD.CPprocedurePage 61TD.CP.RECORDS.PDoes the process include records requirements for the corrosion control activities listed in §192.491? References: 192.605(b)(2), 192.491(a), 192.491(b), 192.491(c)#

TD.CPrecordPage 61TD.CP.RECORDS.RDo records indicate the location of all corrosion control items listed in §192.491(a)? References: 192.491(a), 192.491(b), 192.491(c)#

TD.CPprocedurePage 61TD.CP.POST1971.PDoes the process require that each buried or submerged pipeline installed after July 31, 1971, be protected against external corrosion with a cathodic protection system within 1 year after completion of construction, conversion to service, or becoming jurisdictional onshore gathering? References: 192.605(b)(2), 192.455(a), 192.457(a), 192.452(a), 192.452(b), 192.455(c), 192.455(d)#

TD.CPprocedurePage 62TD.CP.PRE1971.PDoes the process require that pipelines installed before August 1, 1971 (except for cast and ductile iron lines) which are 1) bare or ineffectively coated transmission lines, or 2) bare or coated pipes in compressor, regulator or meter stations, or 3) bare or coated distribution lines, must be cathodically protected in areas where active corrosion is found? References: 192.605(b)(2), 192.457(b)#

TD.CPprocedurePage 62TD.CP.ALUMINUM.PDoes the process give adequate guidance for the installation of aluminum in a submerged or buried pipeline? References: 192.605(b)(2), 192.455(e)#

TD.CPprocedurePage 62TD.CP.AMPHOTERIC.PDoes the process describe criteria to be used for cathodic protection of amphoteric metals (aluminum) that are included in a steel pipeline? References: 192.605(b)(2), 192.463(b), 192.463(c)#

TD.CPprocedurePage 62TD.CP.UNPROTECT.PDoes the process give sufficient direction for the monitoring of external corrosion on buried pipelines that are not protected by cathodic protection? References: 192.605(b)(2), 192.465(e)#

TD.CPrecordPage 62TD.CP.UNPROTECT.RDo records adequately document that exposed buried piping was examined for corrosion and deteriorated coating? References: 192.491(c), 192.465(e)#

TD.CPprocedurePage 62TD.CP.ELECISOLATE.PDoes the process give adequate guidance for electrically isolating each buried or submerged pipeline from other metallic structures unless they electrically interconnect and cathodically protect the pipeline and the other structures as a single unit? References: 192.605(b)(2), 192.467(a), 192.467(b), 192.467(c), 192.467(d), 192.467(e)#

TD.CPrecordPage 62TD.CP.ELECISOLATE.RDo records adequately document electrical isolation of each buried or submerged pipeline from other metallic structures unless they electrically interconnect and cathodically protect the pipeline and the other structures as a single unit? References: 192.491(c), 192.467(a), 192.467(b), 192.467(c), 192.467(d), 192.467(e)#

TD.CPobservationPage 62TD.CP.ELECISOLATE.OAre measures performed to ensure electrical isolation of each buried or submerged pipeline from other metallic structures unless they electrically interconnect and cathodically protect the pipeline and the other structures as a single unit? References: 192.467(a), 192.467(b), 192.467(c), 192.467(d), 192.467(e)#

TD.CPobservationPage 63TD.CP.ADJACENTMETAL.ODo field observations confirm impressed current type cathodic protection systems and galvanic anode systems are installed so as to minimize any adverse effect on existing adjacent underground metallic structures? References: 192.473(b)#

TD.CPprocedurePage 63TD.CP.GRAPHITIZE.PDoes the process give adequate guidance for remediation of graphitization of cast iron or ductile iron pipe? References: 192.605(b)(2), 192.489(a), 192.489(b)#

TD.CPobservationPage 63TD.CP.GRAPHITIZE.OHas there been adequate remediation for the graphitization of cast iron or ductile iron pipe? References: 192.489(a), 192.489(b)#

TD.CPprocedurePage 63TD.CP.RECORDS.PDoes the process include records requirements for the corrosion control activities listed in §192.491? References: 192.605(b)(2), 192.491(a), 192.491(b), 192.491(c)#

TD.CPrecordPage 63TD.CP.RECORDS.RDo records indicate the location of all corrosion control items listed in §192.491(a)? References: 192.491(a), 192.491(b), 192.491(c)#

TD.COATprocedurePage 63TD.COAT.NEWPIPE.PDoes the process require that each buried or submerged pipeline installed after July 31, 1971 be externally coated with a material that is adequate for underground service on a cathodically protected pipeline? References: 192.605(b)(2), 192.455(a), 192.455(b), 192.455(c), 192.455(d), 192.461(a), 192.461(b), 192.463, 192.483(a)#

TD.COATrecordPage 63TD.COAT.NEWPIPE.RDo records document that each buried or submerged pipeline installed after July 31, 1971 has been externally coated with a suitable coating material? References: 192.491(c), 192.455(a), 192.461(a), 192.461(b), 192.483(a)#

TD.COATobservationPage 63TD.COAT.NEWPIPEINSTALL.OIs external protective coating being protected from damage that could result from adverse ditch conditions or supporting blocks? References: 192.461(d)#

TD.COATprocedurePage 64TD.COAT.CONVERTPIPE.PDoes the process require that each buried or submerged pipeline that has been converted to gas service and was installed after July 31, 1971, be protected against external corrosion with an adequate coating unless exempted by 192.455(b)? References: 192.605(b)(2), 192.452(a), 192.455(a), 192.455(b), 192.455(c), 192.455(d), 192.461(a)#

TD.CPEXPOSEDprocedurePage 64TD.CPEXPOSED.EXPOSEINSPECT.PDoes the process require that exposed portions of buried pipeline must be examined for external corrosion? References: 192.605(b)(2), 192.459#

TD.CPEXPOSEDprocedurePage 64TD.CPEXPOSED.EXPOSECORRODE.PDoes the process require further examination of exposed buried pipe if corrosion is found? References: 192.605(b)(2), 192.459#

TD.CPEXPOSEDrecordPage 64TD.CPEXPOSED.EXPOSEINSPECT.RDo records adequately document that exposed buried piping was examined for corrosion? References: 192.491(c), 192.459#

TD.CPEXPOSEDprocedurePage 64TD.CPEXPOSED.MONITORCRITERIA.PDoes the process require CP monitoring criteria to be used that is acceptable? References: 192.605(b)(2), 192.463(a), 192.463(c)#

TD.CPprocedurePage 64TD.CP.RECORDS.PDoes the process include records requirements for the corrosion control activities listed in §192.491? References: 192.605(b)(2), 192.491(a), 192.491(b), 192.491(c)#

TD.CPrecordPage 64TD.CP.RECORDS.RDo records indicate the location of all corrosion control items listed in §192.491(a)? References: 192.491(a), 192.491(b), 192.491(c)#

TD.ICPprocedurePage 65TD.ICP.CORRGAS.PDoes the process require that the corrosive effect of the gas in the pipeline be investigated and if determined to be corrosive, steps be taken to minimize internal corrosion? References: 192.605(b)(2), 192.475(a)#

TD.ICPrecordPage 65TD.ICP.CORRGAS.RDo the records demonstrate that the corrosive effect of the gas in the pipeline has been investigated and if determined to be corrosive, steps be taken to minimize internal corrosion? References: 192.491(c), 192.475(a)#

TD.ICPobservationPage 65TD.ICP.CORRGASPRVNT.OIf the transportation of corrosive gas is not allowed, is the transportation of corrosive gas prevented? References: 192.475(a)#

TD.ICPprocedurePage 65TD.ICP.CORRGASACTION.PDoes the process give adequate direction for actions to be taken if corrosive gas is being transported by pipeline? References: 192.605(b)(2), 192.477#

TD.ICPrecordPage 65TD.ICP.CORRGASACTION.RDo records document the actions taken when corrosive gas is being transported by pipeline? References: 192.491(c), 192.477#

TD.ICPobservationPage 65TD.ICP.CORRGASACTION.OAre adequate actions taken when corrosive gas is being transported by pipeline? References: 192.477#

TD.ICPprocedurePage 65TD.ICP.EXAMINE.PDoes the process direct personnel to examine removed pipe for evidence of internal corrosion? References: 192.605(b)(2), 192.475(a), 192.475(b)#

TD.ICPrecordPage 65TD.ICP.EXAMINE.RDo records document examination of removed pipe for evidence of internal corrosion? References: 192.491(c), 192.475(a), 192.475(b)#

TD.ICPprocedurePage 65TD.ICP.EVALUATE.PDoes the process give sufficient guidance for personnel to evaluate the remaining strength of pipe that has been internally corroded? References: 192.605(b)(2), 192.487#

TD.ICPrecordPage 66TD.ICP.EVALUATE.RDo records document adequate evaluation of internally corroded pipe? References: 192.491(c), 192.487#

TD.ICPobservationPage 66TD.ICP.PIPEBOTTLE.OIs gas containing more than 0.25 grain of hydrogen sulfide per 100 standard cubic feet (5.8 milligrams/m3) at standard conditions (4 parts per million) being stored in pipe-type or bottle-type holders? References: 192.475(c)#

AR.RCOMprocedurePage 66AR.RCOM.REPAIR.PDoes the process give sufficient guidance for personnel to repair or replace pipe that has corroded to an extent that there is no longer sufficient remaining strength in the pipe wall? References: 192.605(b)(2), 192.487(a), 192.487(b), 192.489(a), 192.489(b), 192.491(c)#

AR.RCOMrecordPage 66AR.RCOM.REPAIR.RDo records document the repair or replacement of pipe that has been internally corroded to an extent that there is not sufficient remaining strength in the pipe wall? References: 192.487, 192.489#

AR.RCOMobservationPage 66AR.RCOM.REMEDIATIONOM.OIs anomaly remediation and documentation of remediation adequate for all segments? References: 192.487(a), 192.487(b), 192.489#

TQ.PROT9observationPage 66TQ.PROT9.CORRECTION.OHave potential issues identified by the OQ plan inspection process been corrected at the operational level? References: 192.801(a), 192.809(a)#

TQ.PROT9observationPage 66TQ.PROT9.TASKPERFORMANCE.OCovered Task Performance Verify the qualified individuals performed the observed covered tasks in accordance with the operator's procedures or operator approved contractor procedures. References: 192.801(a), 192.809(a)#

TQ.PROT9observationPage 66TQ.PROT9.QUALIFICATIONSTATUS.OQualification Status Verify the individuals performing the observed covered tasks are currently qualified to perform the covered tasks. References: 192.801(a), 192.809(a)#

TQ.PROT9observationPage 67TQ.PROT9.AOCRECOG.OAbnormal Operating Condition Recognition and Reaction Verify the individuals performing covered tasks are cognizant of the AOCs that are applicable to the tasks observed. References: 192.801(a), 192.809(a)#

TQ.PROT9observationPage 67TQ.PROT9.VERIFYQUAL.OVerification of Qualification Observe in the field (job site, local office, etc.) that the foreman/supervisor/manager has verified the qualification of the individual performing the task, that the qualification records are current, and ensure the personal identification of all individuals performing covered tasks are checked, prior to task performance. References: 192.801(a), 192.809(a)#

TQ.OQprocedurePage 67TQ.OQ.CHANGENOTIFY.PDoes the process require significant OQ program changes to be identified and the Administrator or State agency notified? References: 192.805(i), 192.18#

TQ.OQrecordPage 67TQ.OQ.CHANGERECORD.RAre records maintained for changes that affect covered tasks and significant OQ plan changes? References: 192.805(i), 192.805(f), 192.18#

TQ.OQprocedurePage 67TQ.OQ.EVALMETHOD.PAre evaluation methods established and documented appropriate to each covered task? References: 192.805(b), 192.803, 192.809(d), 192.809(e)#

TQ.OQprocedurePage 67TQ.OQ.MOC.PDoes the OQ program identify how changes to procedures, tools standards and other elements used by individuals in performing covered tasks are communicated to the individuals, including contractor individuals, and how these changes are implemented in the evaluation method(s)? References: 192.805(f)#

TQ.OQprocedurePage 67TQ.OQ.NONQUALIFIED.PAre there provisions for non-qualified individuals to perform covered tasks while being directed and observed by a qualified individual, and are there restrictions and limitations placed on such activities? References: 192.805(c)#

TQ.OQprocedurePage 68TQ.OQ.OQCONTRACTOREQUIV.PDoes the OQ plan document that the operator has assured that the procedures on which an OQ vendor has evaluated qualified personnel are the same or consistent with those used by the operator for employees and contractors in the field? References: 192.805(h)#

TQ.OQobservationPage 68TQ.OQ.OQPLAN.ODo individuals performing covered tasks demonstrate adequate skills, knowledge, and ability? References: 192.805(h)#

TQ.OQprocedurePage 68TQ.OQ.OQPLAN.PIs there an OQ plan that includes covered tasks, and the basis used for identifying covered tasks? References: 192.805(a), 192.801(b)#

TQ.OQprocedurePage 68TQ.OQ.OQPLANCONTRACTOR.PDoes the OQ plan have a process to communicate the OQ plan requirements to contractors and ensure that contractors are following it? References: 192.805(b), 192.805(f), 192.805(c)#

TQ.OQrecordPage 68TQ.OQ.PERFMONITOR.RIf the operator had an incident/accident where there is reason to believe that an individual contributed to the cause, do records indicate evaluation of the individual following the occurrence? References: 192.805(d), 192.805(e)#

TQ.OQrecordPage 68TQ.OQ.RECORDS.RDo records document the evaluation and qualifications of individuals performing covered tasks, and can the qualification of individuals performing covered tasks be verified? References: 192.807#

TQ.OQprocedurePage 68TQ.OQ.TRAINING.PDoes the OQ program provide for initial qualification, retraining and reevaluation of individuals performing covered tasks? References: 192.805(h)#

TQ.OQprocedurePage 68TQ.OQ.OQCONTRACTOR.PDoes the OQ plan require other entities that perform covered tasks on behalf of the operator to be qualified? References: 192.805(b), 192.805(c), 192.805(d), 192.805(e), 192.805(f)#

TQ.OQprocedurePage 68TQ.OQ.REEVALINTERVAL.PDoes the OQ plan establish and justify requirements for reevaluation intervals for each covered task? References: 192.805(g)#

TQ.OQrecordPage 69TQ.OQ.TRAINING.RDoes the operator have records for initial qualification, retraining and reevaluation of individuals performing covered tasks? References: 192.807(a), 192.807(b)#

TQ.OQrecordPage 69TQ.OQ.OQCONTRACTOR.RAre adequate records containing the required elements maintained for contractor personnel? References: 192.807(a), 192.807(b)#

TQ.OQrecordPage 69TQ.OQ.OTHERENTITY.RIf the operator employs other entities to perform covered tasks, such as mutual assistance, are adequate records containing the required elements maintained? References: 192.805(b), 192.805(c), 192.803#

TQ.OQprocedurePage 69TQ.OQ.ABNORMAL.PDoes the OQ Plan contain requirements to assure that individuals performing covered tasks are able to recognize and react to abnormal operating conditions (AOCs)? References: 192.803#

TQ.OQrecordPage 69TQ.OQ.ABNORMAL.RDo records document evaluation of qualified individuals for recognition and reaction to AOCs? References: 192.807(a), 192.807(b), 192.803#

TQ.OQobservationPage 69TQ.OQ.ABNORMAL.ODo individuals performing covered tasks have adequate knowledge to recognize and react to abnormal operating conditions? References: 192.803#

TQ.OQprocedurePage 69TQ.OQ.PERFMONITOR.PDoes the program include provisions to evaluate an individual if there is reason to believe that performance of a covered task contributed to an incident or accident as defined in Parts 192 and 195 or there is reason to believe an individual is no longer qualified to perform a covered task? References: 192.805(d), 192.805(e)#

TQ.QUprocedurePage 70TQ.QU.CORROSION.PDoes the process require corrosion control procedures to be carried out by, or under the direction of, qualified personnel? References: 192.453, 192.805(b)#

TQ.QUrecordPage 70TQ.QU.CORROSION.RDo records indicate qualification of personnel implementing pipeline corrosion control methods? References: 192.453, 192.807(a), 192.807(b)#

TQ.QUprocedurePage 70TQ.QU.HOTTAPQUAL.PDoes the process require taps on a pipeline under pressure (hot taps) to be performed by qualified personnel? References: 192.627, 192.805(b)#