Guidanceguidance
PI-83-018
Memo: Internal — Pipeline Safety Interpretation
Current as of source date Government source
RegulusPipeline researchRegulusPipeline researchPI-83-018
Page 1October 3, 1983 Odorization of Gas, Section 192.625 James C. Thomas, chief Southern Region, Pipeline Safety, DMt-16 Richard L. Beam, DMT-30 Robert L. Paullin, DMT-10 Your memorandum of September 14, 1983, indicates the need for further information to respond to my cases 1, 2 and 3. Assume that the source line is transmission or non-rural gathering and that it is "legally unodorized" because it meets the provisions of either 192.625(b)(1) or (3) but not (b)(2). I trust this information will be sufficient to respond to cases 1, 2 and 3 which concern "one customer" pipelines. If the type of ultimate consumer does influence your responses to cases 1, 2 and 3 (as suggested in your final paragraph), I request guidance as to how to distinguish between "large volume customer: and, for example, an industrial or farm tap customer. DB C:\WP51\INTERPRT\192\625\83-10-03 1#
This material provides agency context. It does not replace binding regulatory text, and its legal effect depends on the underlying authority and facts.