2026 Hazardous Liquid IA Question Set

AR.ECobservationPage 1AR.EC.ECDAREVQUAL.OOfficial PDFWho Evaluate ECDA Results From the observation of selected integrity assessments, are operator and vendor personnel, including supervisors, who conduct assessments or review assessment results, qualified for the tasks they perform? References: 195.505, 195.452(b)(5), 195.452(f)(8), 195.555#

AR.ECprocedurePage 1AR.EC.ECDAREVQUAL.PWho Evaluate ECDA Results Does the process require that operator/vendor personnel (including supervisors) who review and evaluate ECDA assessment results meet appropriate training, experience, and qualification criteria? References: 195.505, 195.452(f)(8), 195.555#

AR.ECrecordPage 1AR.EC.ECDAREVQUAL.RWho Evaluate ECDA Results Do the records indicate that operator/vendor personnel, including supervisors, who conduct ECDA assessments or review and analyze assessment results are qualified for the tasks they perform? References: 195.507, 195.452(l)(1), 195.555#

AR.ECprocedurePage 1AR.EC.ECDAPLAN.PIs there a process in place for conducting ECDA? References: 195.588(b)(1), 195.588(b)(2), 195.452(f)(5), 195.452(j)(5)(iii)#

AR.ECrecordPage 1AR.EC.ECDAPREASSESS.RDo the records indicate that the ECDA pre-assessment process complied with NACE SP0502- 2010 Section 3? References: 195.589(c), 195.588(b)(2), 195.452(l)(1)(ii), 195.452(j)(5)(iii), 195.452(f)(5)#

AR.ECprocedurePage 1AR.EC.ECDAINTEGRATION.PDoes the process include integrating ECDA results with other information? References: 195.452(f)(3), 195.452(g), 195.588(b)#

AR.ECrecordPage 1AR.EC.ECDAINTEGRATION.RDo the records indicate that the operator integrated other data/information when evaluating data/results? References: 195.452(l)(1)(ii), 195.452(f)(3), 195.452(g), 195.588(b)#

AR.ECrecordPage 1AR.EC.ECDAREGION.RDo the records indicate that the operator identified ECDA Regions? References: 195.589(c), 195.588(b)(2)(ii), 195.588(b)(3), 195.588(b)(5)(ii), 195.452(l)(1)(ii), 195.452(f)(5), 195.452(j)(5)(iii), 195.588(b)(1)#

AR.ECrecordPage 2AR.EC.ECDAINDIRECT.RDo the records indicate that the ECDA indirect inspection process complied with NACE SP0502-2010? References: 195.589(c), 195.588(b)(3), 195.452(l)(1)(ii), 195.452(f)(5), 195.452(j)(5)(iii)#

AR.ECrecordPage 2AR.EC.ECDADIRECT.RDo the records indicate that excavations, direct examinations, and data collection were performed in accordance with NACE SP0502-2010, Section 5? References: 195.589(c), 195.588(b)(4), 195.452(l)(1)(ii), 195.452(f)(5), 195.452(j)(5)(iii)#

AR.ECobservationPage 2AR.EC.ECDADIRECT.OECDA Direct Examination Were ECDA direct examinations conducted in accordance with the plan? References: 195.588(b)(4), 195.588(b)(1), 195.452(b)(5), 195.452(f)(5)#

AR.ECrecordPage 2AR.EC.ECDAANALYSIS.RDo the records indicate that an analysis of the ECDA data and other information was adequate to identify areas where external corrosion activity is most likely? References: 195.452(l)(1)(ii), 195.452(g), 195.452(f)(3), 195.452(j)(5)(iii)#

AR.ECprocedurePage 2AR.EC.ECDAPLANMOC.PHave criteria and internal notification processes been established and implemented for any changes in the ECDA plan? References: 195.588(b)(4)(iii), 195.452(f)(4)#

AR.ECrecordPage 2AR.EC.ECDAPLANMOC.RDo the records indicate that changes in the ECDA plan have been implemented and documented? References: 195.589(c), 195.588(b)(4)(iii), 195.452(l)(1)(ii), 195.452(f)(4)#

AR.ECrecordPage 2AR.EC.ECDAPOSTASSESS.RDo the records indicate that the requirements for post assessment were implemented? References: 195.589(c), 195.588(b)(5), 195.452(l)(1)(ii), 195.452(f)(4)#

AR.SCCprocedurePage 2AR.SCC.SCCDAREVQUAL.PWho Conduct SCCDA Does the process require that operator and vendor personnel, including supervisors, who apply SCCDA methodology and/or review and evaluate SCCDA assessment results meet appropriate training, experience, and qualification criteria? References: 195.588(c), 195.452(f)(5), 195.555#

AR.SCCrecordPage 3AR.SCC.SCCDAREVQUAL.RWho Conduct SCCDA Do the records indicate that operator/vendor personnel, including supervisors, who apply SCCDA methodology and/or conduct assessments or review assessment results, are qualified for the tasks they perform? References: 195.507, 195.452(l)(1)(ii), 195.588(c), 195.555#

AR.SCCprocedurePage 3AR.SCC.SCCDAPLAN.PWhere operator uses direct assessment on an onshore pipeline to evaluate the effects of stress corrosion cracking, does the operator have a Stress Corrosion Cracking Direct Assessment (SCCDA) Plan that includes all the requirements of 195.588(c) and all the requirements and recommendations of NACE SP0204-2015 (IBR)? References: 195.588(c), 195.452(f)(5)#

AR.SCCrecordPage 3AR.SCC.SCCDAPREASSESS.RDo the records indicate that data was collected and evaluated / integrated in accordance with the Pre-Assessment data gathering and integration requirements? References: 195.589(c), 195.452(l)(1)(ii), 195.588(c), 195.452(g)#

AR.SCCrecordPage 3AR.SCC.SCCDAINDIRINSP.RDo the records indicate that the operator conducted Indirect Inspections via aboveground or other types of measurements, in accordance with NACE SP0204-2015, Section 4? References: 195.589(c), 195.452(l)(1)(ii), 195.588(c)#

AR.SCCrecordPage 3AR.SCC.SCCDAREMEDIATE.RDo the records indicate that the operator prioritized and conducted mitigation activities to address locations at which significant SCC has been detected, in accordance with NACE SP0204-2015, Section 6? References: 195.589(c), 195.452(l)(1)(ii), 195.588(c)#

AR.SCCrecordPage 3AR.SCC.SCCDAPOSTASSESS.RDo the records indicate that the operator conducted the Post-Assessment Step to determine whether SCC mitigation is required, in accordance with NACE SP0204-2015, Section 6? References: 195.589(c), 195.452(l)(1)(ii), 195.588(c), 195.452(g)#

AR.SCCrecordPage 3AR.SCC.SCCDAREASSESSINTRVL.RDo the records indicate that the operator determined a re-assessment interval based on analysis of SCCDA results? References: 195.589(c), 195.452(l)(1)(ii), 195.588(c)#

AR.SCCrecordPage 3AR.SCC.SCCDAEFFMETHODS.RDo the records indicate that the operator evaluated the effectiveness of the SCCDA approach used in its SCCDA Plan? References: 195.589(c), 195.452(l)(1)(ii), 195.588(c)#

AR.SCCobservationPage 3AR.SCC.SCCDAALL.OSCCDA - Performance Observations From field observations, was SCCDA performed in accordance with the SCCDA plan? References: 195.588(c), 195.505#

AR.IAprocedurePage 4AR.IA.BAPMETHOD.PILI Method for Baseline Assessments (Beginning July 1, 2020) Beginning July 1, 2020, does the Baseline Assessment Plan include inline inspection tools to assess line pipe based on the range of relevant threats to the pipeline segment? References: 195.452(f)(2), 195.452(c)(1)(i), 195.452(c)(1)(i)(A)#

AR.IArecordPage 4AR.IA.BAPMETHOD.RILI Method for Baseline Assessments (Beginning July 1, 2020) For baseline assessments performed on or after July 1, 2020, were the assessments completed using the appropriate assessment method(s)? References: 195.452(l)(1)(ii), 195.452(c)(1)(i)#

AR.IAprocedurePage 4AR.IA.METHOD.PDoes the process specify assessment methods that are appropriate for the pipeline integrity threats? References: 195.452(f)(5), 195.452(j)(5), 195.452(c)(1)(i)(A), 195.591, 195.588#

AR.IArecordPage 4AR.IA.METHOD.RDo the records indicate that the assessment methods shown in the assessment plan are appropriate for the pipeline specific integrity threats? References: 195.452(l)(1)(ii), 195.452(f)(5), 195.452(j)(5), 195.452(c)(1)(i)(A), 195.591, 195.588#

AR.IAprocedurePage 4AR.IA.ASSESSSCHEDULE.PDoes the process for assessment include a prioritized schedule in accordance with 195.452(d) for baseline assessments and 195.452(j) for continual assessments that is based on all the risk factors required by 195.452(e)? References: 195.452(f)(5), 195.452(j)(3), 195.452(j)(5), 195.452(e), 195.452(g), 195.591, 195.452(d)(1), 195.452(n)#

AR.IArecordPage 4AR.IA.ASSESSSCHEDULE.RDo the records indicate that assessments are implemented as specified in the assessment plan? References: 195.452(l)(1)(ii), 195.452(b)(5), 195.452(c), 195.452(d), 195.452(f)(5), 195.452(j)(3), 195.452(j)(5), 195.591#

AR.IAprocedurePage 4AR.IA.REVIEWQUAL.PWho Evaluate Integrity Assessment Results and Perform Information Analysis Does the process specify qualification requirements for personnel who review and evaluate integrity assessment results and information analysis? References: 195.452(f)(8), 195.452(g), 195.452(h)(2)#

AR.IArecordPage 5AR.IA.REVIEWQUAL.RWho Evaluate Integrity Assessment Results and Perform Information Analysis Do the records indicate that personnel who review and evaluate integrity assessment results and information analysis are qualified? References: 195.452(l)(1)(ii), 195.452(f)(8), 195.452(g), 195.452(h)(2)#

AR.IAprocedurePage 5AR.IA.STANDARDS.PDoes the process incorporate recognized industry practices, or an acceptable alternative method, in performing integrity assessments? References: 195.452(f)(5), 195.452(b)(6)#

AR.IArecordPage 5AR.IA.STANDARDS.RDo the records indicate that recognized industry practices, or an acceptable alternative method, have been incorporated in performing integrity assessments? References: 195.452(l)(1)(ii), 195.452(b)(6)#

AR.ILprocedurePage 5AR.IL.ILIIMPLPERQUAL.PDoes the process identify the qualification requirements for personnel who perform ILI (In Line Inspections)? References: 195.452(f)(5), 195.591#

AR.ILrecordPage 5AR.IL.ILIIMPLPERQUAL.RDo the records indicate that personnel who perform ILI (In Line Inspections) are qualified and certified (where applicable)? References: 195.591, 195.452(l)(1)(ii), 195.452(f)(5)#

AR.ILprocedurePage 5AR.IL.ILIREVIEWQUAL.PWho Evaluate ILI Results and Perform Information Analysis Does the process specify qualification requirements for personnel who review and evaluate ILI integrity assessment results and information analysis? References: 195.452(f)(8), 195.452(g)#

AR.ILrecordPage 5AR.IL.ILIREVIEWQUAL.RWho Evaluate ILI Results and Perform Information Analysis Do the records indicate that personnel who review and evaluate ILI integrity assessment results and information analysis are qualified? References: 195.452(l)(1)(ii), 195.452(f)(8), 195.452(g)#

AR.ILprocedurePage 5AR.IL.ILISPECS.PDoes the process include adequate ILI requirements for the qualification of in-line inspection systems, including personnel, equipment, processes, and software utilization? References: 195.452(f)(5), 195.452(h), 195.452(j), 195.591#

AR.ILrecordPage 6AR.IL.ILISPECS.RDo the records indicate that ILI requirements for the qualification of in-line inspection systems, including personnel, equipment, processes, and software utilization were included and followed? References: 195.452(l)(1)(ii), 195.452(f)(5), 195.452(h), 195.452(j), 195.591#

AR.ILprocedurePage 6AR.IL.ILIVALIDATE.PDoes the process include the validation of ILI results? References: 195.452(f)(4), 195.452(j)(5)(i), 195.452(h), 195.591#

AR.ILrecordPage 6AR.IL.ILIVALIDATE.RDo the records for validating ILI assessment results indicate that the process was implemented? References: 195.452(l)(1)(ii), 195.452(j)(5)(i), 195.452(f)(4), 195.452(h), 195.452(c)(1), 195.591, 195.452(c)(1)(i)(A)#

AR.ILprocedurePage 6AR.IL.ILIINTEGRATION.PDoes the process for evaluating ILI results include integration of all available information about the integrity of the pipeline? References: 195.452(f)(3), 195.452(g), 195.452(h)#

AR.ILrecordPage 6AR.IL.ILIINTEGRATION.RDo the records indicate that the operator integrated other data/information when evaluating ILI tool data/results? References: 195.452(l)(1)(ii), 195.452(g), 195.452(f)(3), 195.452(h)#

AR.ILobservationPage 6AR.IL.ILIIMPLEMENT.OHave the ILI procedures been followed? References: 195.452(b)(5)#

AR.ILprocedurePage 6AR.IL.PETIONILI.PWhen Lines Cannot be Modified to Accommodate ILI Beginning July 1, 2020, does the process include provisions to petition the PHMSA Administrator when IM-covered segments cannot be modified to accommodate ILI? References: 195.402(c)(3), 195.452(n)#

AR.ILrecordPage 6AR.IL.PETIONILI.RPetitioning the PHMSA Administrator when Lines Cannot be Modified to Accommodate ILI Were petitions filed because pipelines could not be modified to accommodate ILI? References: 195.452(n)#

AR.PAprocedurePage 7AR.PA.METHOD.PDoes the process specify assessment methods that are appropriate for the pipeline integrity threats? References: 195.402(c), 195.416(c), 195.591, 195.588(a), 195.588(b), 195.588(c)#

AR.PArecordPage 7AR.PA.METHOD.RDo records indicate that the assessment methods shown in the assessment plan are appropriate for the pipeline specific integrity threats? References: 195.404(c), 195.416(c), 195.591, 195.588(a), 195.588(b), 195.588(c)#

AR.PAprocedurePage 7AR.PA.REVIEWQUAL.PWho Analyze Pipeline Data Obtained from Assessment Does the process specify qualification requirements for a person who analyze the data obtained from an assessment? References: 195.402(c), 195.416(e), 195.591#

AR.PArecordPage 7AR.PA.REVIEWQUAL.RWho Analyze Pipeline Data Obtained from Assessment Do records indicate that personnel who analyze the data obtained from an assessment are qualified? References: 195.404(c), 195.416(e), 195.591#

AR.PAprocedurePage 7AR.PA.STANDARDS.PDoes the process to perform pipeline assessments incorporate required industry practices in performing pipeline assessments and identifying anomalies? References: 195.402(c), 195.591#

AR.PArecordPage 7AR.PA.STANDARDS.RDo records indicate that pipeline in-line inspection assessments used industry practices in performing pipeline assessments and identifying anomalies? References: 195.404(c), 195.591, 195.416(c)#

AR.PAprocedurePage 7AR.PA.DISCOVERY.PDoes the pipeline assessment process define "discovery of condition" and the required time frame for identification of anomalies to be remediated? References: 195.402(c), 195.416(f), 195.401(b)(1), 195.416(h)#

AR.PArecordPage 7AR.PA.DISCOVERY.RDo records indicate that “discovery of condition” results for all anomalies occurred promptly, but no later than 180 days after the completion of the pipeline assessment? References: 195.404(c), 195.416(f), 195.401(b)(1), 195.416(h)#

AR.PAprocedurePage 8AR.PA.CRACKREMEDIATION.PIf the pipeline is susceptible to cracking, does the process include criteria for remedial actions to address integrity issues raised by the assessment method? References: 195.402(c), 195.416, 195.401(b)(1), 195.591#

AR.PArecordPage 8AR.PA.CRACKREMEDIATION.RIf the pipeline is susceptible to cracking, do records indicate that the remedial actions have been documented? References: 195.404(c), 195.416(g), 195.416(h), 195.401(b)(1), 195.591#

AR.PTIprocedurePage 8AR.PTI.PRESSTESTACCEP.PDoes the process define acceptance criteria for a successful pressure test? References: 195.452(f)(5), 195.304, 195.305, 195.306, 195.308, 195.452(j)(5)(ii)#

AR.PTIprocedurePage 8AR.PTI.PRESSTESTCORR.PDoes the process require that the effectiveness of the corrosion control program be evaluated when using pressure testing as an integrity assessment? References: 195.452(f)(3), 195.452(g)(3)#

AR.PTIobservationPage 8AR.PTI.PRESSTESTRESULT.OConduct of Pressure Tests Was the pressure test conducted in accordance with the procedures? References: 195.452(b)(5), 195.452(c)(1)(i)(B), 195.452(j)(5)(ii), 195.304#

AR.PTIrecordPage 8AR.PTI.PRESSTESTRESULT.RDo the pressure test records indicate compliance with Part 195, Subpart E? References: 195.310, 195.452(f)(2), 195.452(f)(5), 195.452(c), 195.452(l)(1)(ii)#

AR.PTIrecordPage 8AR.PTI.PRESSTESTCORR.RWhen pressure testing was used as the integrity assessment method, do the records indicate that the effectiveness of the corrosion control program was documented? References: 195.452(l)(1)(ii), 195.452(f)(3), 195.452(g)(3)#

AR.PTIRBprocedurePage 9AR.PTIRB.RISKBASEDALT.PIf applicable per 195.303, does the process include the review of risk classification of pipeline segments which have not been pressure tested (Risk Classification A)? References: 195.303(a), 195.303(g)#

AR.PTIRBrecordPage 9AR.PTIRB.RISKBASEDALT.RIf applicable per 195.303, do the records indicate that the risk classification of pipeline segments not pressure tested have been reviewed? References: 195.303(h), 195.303(g)#

AR.OTprocedurePage 9AR.OT.OTPLAN.PIf "Other Technologies" are used, does the process provide an equivalent understanding of the condition of the line pipe? References: 195.452(f)(5), 195.452(c)(1)(i)(D), 195.452(j)(5)(iv), 195.416(d)#

AR.OTrecordPage 9AR.OT.OTPLAN.RDo the records indicate that the Other Technology integrity assessments were performed in accordance with procedures and vendor recommendations? References: 195.452(l)(1)(ii), 195.452(j)(5)(iv), 195.452(f)(5), 195.452(c)(1)(i)(D), 195.416(d)#

AR.OTobservationPage 9AR.OT.OTPLAN.OHas the process for the use of "Other Technology" been followed? References: 195.452(b)(5), 195.416(d)#

AR.OTprocedurePage 9AR.OT.ASSESSMENTREVIEW.PWho Evaluate Results of Other Technology Integrity Assessments Does the process specify qualification requirements for personnel who review and evaluate the results of an integrity assessment and information analysis using Other Technology? References: 195.452(f)(8), 195.452(j)(5), 195.416(d)#

AR.OTrecordPage 9AR.OT.ASSESSMENTREVIEW.RWho Evaluate Results of Other Technology Integrity Assessments Do the records pertaining to the selected integrity assessments indicate that personnel who review and evaluate the results of an integrity assessment and information analysis using Other Technology are qualified? References: 195.452(l)(1)(ii), 195.452(f)(8), 195.452(j)(5), 195.416(d)#

AR.RCHCAprocedurePage 10AR.RCHCA.DISCOVERY.PDoes the integrity assessment process define "discovery of condition" and the required time frame for anomalies in a pipeline segment that can affect an HCA? References: 195.452(f)(4), 195.452(h)(2)#

AR.RCHCAprocedurePage 10AR.RCHCA.IMSCHEDULE.PDoes the process include developing a prioritized schedule for evaluating and remediating all identified repair conditions consistent with the repair criteria and within the time frames found in 195.452(h)(4)? References: 195.452(f)(4), 195.452(h)(3), 195.452(h)(4)#

AR.RCHCAprocedurePage 10AR.RCHCA.IMSCHEDULE2.PConsideration of Risk Consequence Factors when Scheduling Repairs in IM-Covered Segments For assets covered by the IM program, does the process require that the risk to people, property, and the environment be considered in prioritizing the correction of conditions? References: 195.402(c)(3), 195.401(b)(3)#

AR.RCHCArecordPage 10AR.RCHCA.DISCOVERY.RDo the records indicate that “discovery of condition” results for all anomalies occurred promptly, but no later than 180 days after the completion of the integrity assessment? References: 195.452(l)(1)(ii), 195.452(h)(2), 195.452(f)(4)#

AR.RCHCAprocedurePage 10AR.RCHCA.IMPRC.PDoes the process include criteria for remedial action to address integrity issues raised by the assessment methods and information analysis? References: 195.452(f)(4), 195.452(h)(1), 195.452(h)(4)#

AR.RCHCArecordPage 10AR.RCHCA.REMEDIATION.RDo records indicate that anomaly remediation and documentation of remediation was performed in accordance with the process? References: 195.452(l)(1)(ii), 195.452(h)(3), 195.452(h)(4), 195.452(b)(5), 195.569#

AR.RCHCArecordPage 10AR.RCHCA.IMPRC.RDo records indicate that prompt action was taken to address all anomalous conditions discovered through the integrity assessment or information analysis? References: 195.452(l)(1)(ii), 195.452(f)(4), 195.452(h)(1), 195.452(h)(4)#

AR.RCHCAobservationPage 10AR.RCHCA.REMEDIATION.ORemedial Actions (IM) From an observation of a remediation or repair at an excavation site, are anomaly remediation activities adequate, performed in accordance with the categorized remediation/repair schedule, and documented? References: 195.452(b)(5), 195.402(a), 195.402(c)(14), 195.422(a), 195.569, 195.589(c)#

AR.RCHCAprocedurePage 11AR.RCHCA.REMEDIATION.PDoes the process require that remedial actions be performed in a manner that addresses the integrity issues raised by the assessment methods used and information analysis? References: 195.452(f)(4), 195.452(h)(1), 195.422(b)#

AR.RCHCAprocedurePage 11AR.RCHCA.PRESSREDUCE.PDoes the process for pressure reduction meet the code requirements? References: 195.452(f)(4), 195.428, 195.452(h)(1)(i), 195.452(h)(1)(ii)#

AR.RCHCArecordPage 11AR.RCHCA.PRESSREDUCE.RDo the integrity assessment records indicate that the pressure reduction taken was acceptable and promptly implemented? References: 195.452(l)(1)(ii), 195.404(a), 195.404(b), 195.452(h)(1)(ii), 195.452(h)(4)(i), 195.55(a), 195.56#

AR.RCHCArecordPage 11AR.RCHCA.IMSCHEDULE.RDo the records indicate that the operator has met the schedule for remediating a condition in accordance with 195.452(h)(4)? References: 195.452(l)(1)(ii), 195.452(h)(3), 195.452(h)(4)#

AR.RCHCArecordPage 11AR.RCHCA.IMSCHEDULE2.RDo records demonstrate that the risk to people, property, and the environment was considered when prioritizing the correction of conditions occurring on assets covered by the IM program? References: 195.401(b)(3), 195.452(l)(1)(ii), 195.404(c)(1), 195.589(c)#

AR.RCHCAprocedurePage 11AR.RCHCA.CRACKREMEDIATION.PIf the pipeline is susceptible to cracking, does the process include criteria for remedial actions to address integrity issues raised by the assessment method? References: 195.452(f)(4), 195.452(h), 195.588(c)#

AR.RCHCArecordPage 11AR.RCHCA.CRACKREMEDIATION.RIf the pipeline is susceptible to cracking, do the records indicate that the remedial actions have been documented? References: 195.452(l)(1)(ii), 195.452(f)(4), 195.452(h)(4)(iii)(G), 195.588(c)#

AR.RCOMprocedurePage 12AR.RCOM.REPAIRNONHCA.PRepair Criteria in Non-HCA Segments For non-HCA pipeline segments, do the integrity assessment and maintenance processes include adequate criteria for determining the need for, and timeliness of, pipeline defect repairs? References: 195.402(c)(3), 195.401(b)(1), 195.422(a), 195.422(b), 195.585(a), 195.585(b), 195.401(b)(3)#

AR.RCOMrecordPage 12AR.RCOM.REPAIRNONHCA.RRepair Criteria in Non-HCA Segments For non-HCA pipeline segments, do the records for selected ILI and remediation projects indicate that conditions were repaired that posed a threat to pipeline integrity? References: 195.404(c), 195.585(a), 195.585(b), 195.422(a), 195.422(b), 195.401(b)(1), 195.401(b)(3)#

AR.RCOMobservationPage 12AR.RCOM.REMEDIATIONOM.ODo the performance and documentation of remediation meet procedural requirements for non-IM repairs? References: 195.422(a), 195.422(b), 195.401(b)(1), 195.402(a), 195.402(c)(14), 195.579(c), 195.569#

AR.RMPprocedurePage 12AR.RMP.SAFETY.PDoes the process ensure that repairs are made in a safe manner and are made so as to prevent damage to persons and property? References: 195.402(c)(14), 195.422(a), 195.452(h)(1)#

AR.RMPobservationPage 12AR.RMP.SAFETY.OAre repairs made in a safe manner and to prevent injury to persons and/or property damage? References: 195.422(a), 195.402(c)(14), 195.452(h)(1)#

AR.RMPprocedurePage 12AR.RMP.METHOD.PDoes the process identify permissible repair methods for each type of defect? References: 195.402(c)(3), 195.452(h)(1), 195.585#

AR.RMPrecordPage 12AR.RMP.METHOD.RPermissible Repair Methods From the review of the results of integrity assessment and remediation projects, were all repairs performed in accordance with procedures and applicable sections of 49 CFR Part 195? References: 195.404(c)(1), 195.422(a), 195.422(b), 195.452(h)(1), 195.401(b)(1), 195.401(b)(2)#

AR.RMPrecordPage 13AR.RMP.REPAIRQUAL.RQualification of Personnel Performing Pipeline Repair From the records review of the results of integrity assessment and remediation projects, were personnel performing repairs, other than welding, qualified for the task they performed? References: 195.505(b), 195.507(a), 195.505(c), 195.452(h)(1), 195.452(b)(5)#

AR.RMPrecordPage 13AR.RMP.PIPECONDITION.RDo the repair records document all the information needed to understand the conditions of the pipe and its environment and also provide the information needed to support the Integrity Management program, when applicable? References: 195.404(c)(1), 195.404(c)(2), 195.452(l)(1)(ii)#

AR.RMPrecordPage 13AR.RMP.REPLACESTD.RReplacement Components Were all replaced line pipe and/or components designed and constructed as required by Part 195? References: 195.404(a)(1), 195.422(b)#

AR.RMPrecordPage 13AR.RMP.PIPEMOVE.RPipe Movements From a review of selected records, were pipeline movements performed in accordance with 195.424? References: 195.424(a), 195.424(b), 195.424(c)#

AR.RMPrecordPage 13AR.RMP.WELDERQUAL.RWelder Qualification From the review of the results of integrity assessment and remediation projects, were repairs requiring welding performed by qualified welders using qualified welding procedures? References: 195.214(a), 195.214(b), 195.222(a), 195.222(b)#

AR.RMPrecordPage 13AR.RMP.WELDQUAL.RRepair of Weld Defects From the review of the results of integrity assessment and remediation projects, were defects on new welds repaired in accordance with §195.226 or §195.230? References: 195.226(a), 195.226(b), 195.226(c), 195.230(a), 195.230(b), 195.230(c)#

AR.RMPrecordPage 13AR.RMP.WELDINSPECT.RInspection of Welds From the review of the results of remediation projects, were new welds inspected and examined in accordance with §195.228 or §195.234? References: 195.228(a), 195.228(b), 195.234(a), 195.234(b), 195.234(c), 195.234(d), 195.234(e)#

AR.RMPprocedurePage 13AR.RMP.CRACKNDE.PWhen Exposed for Repair Does the process include appropriate NDE method(s) and other information gathering during the evaluation of cracks and cracking? References: 195.452(f)(4), 195.452(h)#

AR.RMPrecordPage 13AR.RMP.CRACKNDE.RWhen Exposed for Repair Do the records indicate that appropriate NDE method(s) were used and other information was gathered related to the evaluation of cracking? References: 195.452(l)(1)(ii), 195.452(f)(4), 195.452(h), 195.404(c)#

AR.SPprocedurePage 14AR.SP.METHODSP.PIf a pipeline operates under a special permit, has the process been modified to incorporate the requirements of the permit for the selected integrity assessment method(s)? References: 190.341(d), 195.452(j)(5)#

AR.SPrecordPage 14AR.SP.METHODSP.RIf a pipeline is operated under a special permit, from a review of selected records, were any one of the four accepted integrity assessment methods performed? References: 190.341(d), 195.452(j)(5)#

AR.SPprocedurePage 14AR.SP.REPAIRSP.PIf a pipeline is operated under a special permit, has the process been modified to incorporate the requirements of the permit for required repairs? References: 190.341(d)#

AR.SPrecordPage 14AR.SP.REPAIRSP.RIf a pipeline is operated under a special permit, from a review of selected records, were repairs performed in accordance with the requirements of the permit? References: 190.341(d)#

CR.CRMGENprocedurePage 14CR.CRMGEN.CRMCRITERIA.PDo procedures adequately address the process and criteria to determine which facilities are control rooms? References: 195.446(a)#

CR.CRMGENprocedurePage 14CR.CRMGEN.CRMMGMT.PAre CRM procedures formalized and controlled? References: 195.446(a)#

CR.CRMGENrecordPage 14CR.CRMGEN.CRMIMPLEMENT.RAre procedures approved, in place, and implemented? References: 195.446(a)#

CR.CRMGENobservationPage 14CR.CRMGEN.CRMPROCLOCATION.OAre procedures readily available to controllers in the control room? References: 195.446(a)#

CR.CRMRRprocedurePage 15CR.CRMRR.RESPONSIBLE.PAre there clear processes to describe each controller's physical domain of responsibility for pipelines and other facility assets? References: 195.446(b)(1)#

CR.CRMRRprocedurePage 15CR.CRMRR.QUALCONTROL.PAre there provisions in place to assure that only qualified individuals may assume control at any console/desk? References: 195.446(b)(1)#

CR.CRMRRprocedurePage 15CR.CRMRR.DOMAINCHANGE.PIf the physical domain of responsibility periodically changes, has a clear process been established to describe the conditions for when such a change occurs? References: 195.446(b)(1)#

CR.CRMRRprocedurePage 15CR.CRMRR.RESPCHANGE.PDo processes address a controller's role during temporary impromptu (unplanned) changes in controller responsibilities? References: 195.446(b)(1)#

CR.CRMRRprocedurePage 15CR.CRMRR.COMMANDVERIFY.PDo the defined roles and responsibilities require controllers to stay at the console to verify all SCADA commands that have been initiated are fulfilled, and that commands given via verbal communications are acknowledged before leaving the console for any reason? References: 195.446(b)(1)#

CR.CRMRRprocedurePage 15CR.CRMRR.AUTHORITYABNORMAL.PHave processes been established to define the controllers' authority and responsibilities when an abnormal operating condition is detected? References: 195.446(b)(2)#

CR.CRMRRobservationPage 15CR.CRMRR.PRESSLIMITS.OAre controllers aware of the current MOPs of all pipeline segments for which they are responsible, and have they been assigned the responsibility to maintain those pipelines at or below the MOP? References: 195.446(b)(2)#

CR.CRMRRprocedurePage 15CR.CRMRR.AUTHORITYEMERGENCY.PDo processes define the controllers' authority and responsibility to make decisions, take actions, and communicate with others upon being notified of, or upon detection of, and during, an emergency or if a leak or rupture is suspected? References: 195.446(b)(3)#

CR.CRMRRprocedurePage 16CR.CRMRR.EVACUATION.PDo processes specifically address the controller's responsibilities in the event the control room must be evacuated? References: 195.446(b)(3)#

CR.CRMRRprocedurePage 16CR.CRMRR.COMMSYSFAIL.PDo processes specifically address the controller's responsibilities in the event of a SCADA system or data communications system failure impacting large sections of the controller's domain of responsibility? References: 195.446(b)(3)#

CR.CRMRRprocedurePage 16CR.CRMRR.HANDOVER.PHave processes been established for the hand-over of responsibility that specify the type of information to be communicated to the oncoming shift? References: 195.446(b)(4), 195.446(c)(5)#

CR.CRMRRobservationPage 16CR.CRMRR.HANDOVER.ODo observations indicate adequate hand-over of responsibility to the oncoming shift? References: 195.446(b)(4), 195.446(c)(5)#

CR.CRMRRprocedurePage 16CR.CRMRR.HANDOVERDOC.PDo processes require that records document the hand-over of responsibility, document the time the actual hand-over of responsibility occurs, and the key information and topics that were communicated during the hand-over? References: 195.446(b)(4), 195.446(c)(5)#

CR.CRMRRrecordPage 16CR.CRMRR.HANDOVERDOC.RAre there records that document the hand-over of responsibility, document the time the actual hand-over of responsibility occurs, and the key information and topics that were communicated during the hand-over? References: 195.446(b)(4), 195.446(c)(5)#

CR.CRMRRprocedurePage 16CR.CRMRR.HANDOVEROVERLAP.PDo processes require the controllers to discuss recent and impending important activities ensuring adequate overlap? References: 195.446(b)(4)#

CR.CRMRRprocedurePage 16CR.CRMRR.HANDOVERALTERNATIVE.PWhen a controller is unable to continue or assume responsibility for any reason, do the shift hand-over processes include alternative shift hand-over actions that specifically address this situation? References: 195.446(b)(4)#

CR.CRMRRprocedurePage 16CR.CRMRR.UNATTENDCONSOLE.PHas the operator established an adequate process for occasions when the console is left temporarily unattended for any reason? References: 195.446(b)(4)#

CR.CRMRRprocedurePage 17CR.CRMRR.CONSOLECOVERAGE.PDo processes maintain adequate console coverage during shift hand-over? References: 195.446(b)(4)#

CR.CRMRRprocedurePage 17CR.CRMRR.OTHERAUTHORITYDISALLOW.PDo processes disallow others to have authority to direct or supersede the specific technical actions of a controller? References: 195.446(b)(5)#

CR.CRMRRrecordPage 17CR.CRMRR.OTHERAUTHORITYDISALLOW.RDo records indicate that the policy disallowing others to have authority to direct or supersede the specific technical actions of a controller has been communicated to controllers and others? References: 195.446(b)(5)#

CR.CRMRRobservationPage 17CR.CRMRR.OTHERAUTHORITYDISALLOW.OAre controllers aware of, and can reference, processes that disallow others to have authority to direct or supersede the specific technical actions of a controller? References: 195.446(b)(5)#

CR.CRMRRprocedurePage 17CR.CRMRR.OTHERAUTHORITYQUAL.PDoes the process result in identification of required qualification elements for those authorized to direct or supersede the technical actions of a controller that are sufficient for those individuals to understand the implications of the scope of potential actions? References: 195.446(b)(5)#

CR.CRMRRrecordPage 17CR.CRMRR.OTHERAUTHORITYQUAL.RDo records indicate that others given authority to direct or supersede the specific technical actions of a controller were qualified? References: 195.446(b)(5)#

CR.CRMRRprocedurePage 17CR.CRMRR.OTHERAUTHORITYIMPLEMENT.PIs the process defined with respect to the details of how those authorized to direct or supersede the technical actions of a controller are to implement their authority? References: 195.446(b)(5)#

CR.CRMRRrecordPage 17CR.CRMRR.OTHERAUTHORITYLIST.RIs a list of individuals with authority to direct or supersede the technical actions of a controller readily available to controllers? References: 195.446(b)(5)#

CR.CRMRRrecordPage 17CR.CRMRR.OTHERAUTHORITYIMPLEMENT.RDo records adequately document occurrences of when others authorized to direct or supersede the technical actions of a controller have done so? References: 195.446(b)(5)#

CR.CRMRRobservationPage 18CR.CRMRR.OTHERAUTHORITYIMPLEMENT.ODo others authorized to direct or supersede the technical actions of a controller demonstrate an understanding of the process to implement this authority? References: 195.446(b)(5)#

CR.SCADAprocedurePage 18CR.SCADA.SYSTEMMOC.PDo processes clearly define the types of changes to the SCADA system(s) that constitute additions, expansions, or replacements under the meaning of the CRM rule? References: 195.446(c)(1)#

CR.SCADAprocedurePage 18CR.SCADA.DISPLAYCONFIG.PAre there written processes to implement the API RP 1165(1st Edition) display standards to the SCADA systems that have been added, expanded, or replaced since August 1, 2012? References: 195.446(c)(1)#

CR.SCADAobservationPage 18CR.SCADA.1165HUMANFACTORS.OHas section 4 of API RP 1165(1st Edition) regarding human factors engineering been implemented? References: 195.446(c)(1)#

CR.SCADArecordPage 18CR.SCADA.DISPLAYHARDWARE.RHas section 5 of API RP 1165(1st Edition) regarding display hardware been implemented? References: 195.446(c)(1)#

CR.SCADArecordPage 18CR.SCADA.DISPLAYLAYOUT.RHas section 6 of API RP 1165(1st Edition) regarding display layout and organization been implemented? References: 195.446(c)(1)#

CR.SCADArecordPage 18CR.SCADA.DISPLAYNAVIGATION.RHas section 7 of API RP 1165(1st Edition) regarding display navigation been implemented? References: 195.446(c)(1)#

CR.SCADAobservationPage 18CR.SCADA.DISPLAYOBJECTS.OHas section 8 of API RP 1165(1st Edition) regarding display object characteristics been implemented? References: 195.446(c)(1)#

CR.SCADArecordPage 19CR.SCADA.DISPLAYDYNAMICS.RHas section 9 of API RP 1165(1st Edition) regarding display object dynamics been implemented? References: 195.446(c)(1)#

CR.SCADArecordPage 19CR.SCADA.CONTROLSELECTION.RHas section 10 of API RP 1165(1st Edition) control selection and techniques been implemented? References: 195.446(c)(1)#

CR.SCADArecordPage 19CR.SCADA.ADMINISTRATION.RHas section 11 of API RP 1165(1st Edition) administration been implemented? References: 195.446(c)(1)#

CR.SCADArecordPage 19CR.SCADA.1165IMPRACTICAL.RIf any/all applicable paragraph(s) of API RP 1165(1st Edition) have not been implemented, has it been demonstrated and documented that the unimplemented provisions are impractical for the SCADA system used? References: 195.446(c)(1)#

CR.SCADAprocedurePage 19CR.SCADA.SETPOINT.PDoes the process adequately define safety-related points? References: 195.446(c)(2), 195.406(b)#

CR.SCADArecordPage 19CR.SCADA.SETPOINT.RDo records indicate safety-related points have been adequately implemented? References: 195.446(c)(2)#

CR.SCADAprocedurePage 19CR.SCADA.POINTVERIFY.PAre there adequate processes to define and identify the circumstances which require a point-to-point verification? References: 195.446(c)(2)#

CR.SCADArecordPage 19CR.SCADA.POINTVERIFY.RHave required point-to-point verifications been performed? References: 195.446(c)(2)#

CR.SCADAprocedurePage 19CR.SCADA.POINTVERIFYEXTENT.PAre there adequate processes for the thoroughness of the point-to-point verification? References: 195.446(c)(2)#

CR.SCADArecordPage 20CR.SCADA.POINTVERIFYEXTENT.RDo records demonstrate adequate thoroughness of the point-to-point verification? References: 195.446(c)(2)#

CR.SCADAprocedurePage 20CR.SCADA.POINTVERFIYINTVL.PIs there an adequate process for defining when the point-to-point verification must be completed? References: 195.446(c)(2)#

CR.SCADArecordPage 20CR.SCADA.POINTVERFIYINTVL.RDo records indicate the point-to-point verification has been completed at the required intervals? References: 195.446(c)(2)#

CR.SCADAobservationPage 20CR.SCADA.POINTVERIFY.OAre point-to-point verifications performed adequately when required? References: 195.446(c)(2)#

CR.SCADAprocedurePage 20CR.SCADA.COMMPLAN.PHas an internal communication plan been established and implemented that is adequate to manually operate the pipeline during a SCADA failure/outage? References: 195.446(c)(3)#

CR.SCADArecordPage 20CR.SCADA.COMMPLAN.RHas the internal communication plan been tested and verified for manual operation of the pipeline safely at least once each calendar year but at intervals not exceeding 15 months? References: 195.446(c)(3)#

CR.SCADAobservationPage 20CR.SCADA.BACKUPSCADA.OIs there a backup SCADA system? References: 195.446(c)(4)#

CR.SCADAprocedurePage 20CR.SCADA.BACKUPSCADADEV.PHas the use of the backup SCADA system for development work been defined? References: 195.446(c)(4)#

CR.SCADAprocedurePage 20CR.SCADA.BACKUPSCADATEST.PIs the backup SCADA system required to be tested at least once each calendar year at intervals not to exceed 15 months? References: 195.446(c)(4)#

CR.SCADArecordPage 21CR.SCADA.BACKUPSCADATEST.RIs the backup SCADA system tested at least once each calendar year at intervals not to exceed 15 months? References: 195.446(c)(4)#

CR.SCADAprocedurePage 21CR.SCADA.BACKUPSCADAVERIFY.PAre there adequate processes in place for decision-making and internal communications to successfully implement a transition from primary SCADA to backup SCADA, and back to primary SCADA? References: 195.446(c)(4)#

CR.SCADArecordPage 21CR.SCADA.BACKUPSCADAVERIFY.RDoes the testing verify that there are adequate processes in place for decision-making and internal communications to successfully implement a transition from primary SCADA to backup SCADA, and back to primary SCADA? References: 195.446(c)(4)#

CR.SCADArecordPage 21CR.SCADA.BACKUPSCADAADEQUACY.RIf the back-up SCADA system is not designed to handle all the functionality of the main SCADA system, does the testing determine whether there are adequate procedures in place to account for displaced and/or different available functions during back-up operations? References: 195.446(c)(4)#

CR.SCADAprocedurePage 21CR.SCADA.BACKUPSCADATRANSFER.PDo processes adequately address and test the logistics of transferring control to a backup control room? References: 195.446(c)(4)#

CR.SCADAprocedurePage 21CR.SCADA.BACKUPSCADARETURN.PDo procedures adequately address and test the logistics of returning operations back to the primary control room? References: 195.446(c)(4)#

CR.SCADArecordPage 21CR.SCADA.BACKUPSCADAFUNCTIONS.RIs a representative sampling of critical functions in the back-up SCADA system being tested to ensure proper operation in the event the backup system is needed? References: 195.446(c)(4)#

CR.SCADAprocedurePage 21CR.SCADA.SCADAOVERPRESSTESTBO.PDoes the process adequately test applicable SCADA controlled overpressure protection devices on pressurized breakout tanks? References: 195.428(b)#

CR.SCADArecordPage 21CR.SCADA.SCADAOVERPRESSTESTBO.RDo records indicate adequate inspection and testing of SCADA overpressure protection devices on pressurized breakout tanks? References: 195.404(a)(1)(vii), 195.404(c)(3), 195.428(b)#

CR.SCADArecordPage 22CR.SCADA.SCADAOVERFILL.RDo records indicate adequate inspection and testing of SCADA overfill protection systems? References: 195.404(a)(1)(vii), 195.404(c)(3), 195.428(d)#

CR.SCADAprocedurePage 22CR.SCADA.SCADAOVERFILL.PIs an adequate process/procedure in place for testing applicable SCADA controlled overfill protection devices? References: 195.428(d), 195.446(b), 195.446(c)#

CR.CRMFMprocedurePage 22CR.CRMFM.FATIGUEMITIGATION.PDoes the fatigue mitigation process or procedures (plan) identify operator-specific fatigue risks? References: 195.446(d)#

CR.CRMFMprocedurePage 22CR.CRMFM.FATIGUERISKS.PDoes the fatigue mitigation plan adequately address how the program reduces the risk associated with controller fatigue? References: 195.446(d), 195.446(a)#

CR.CRMFMprocedurePage 22CR.CRMFM.FATIGUEQUANTIFY.PDo processes require that the potential contribution of controller fatigue to incidents and accidents be quantified during investigations? References: 195.446(d), 195.446(a), 195.446(g)(1)(i)#

CR.CRMFMprocedurePage 22CR.CRMFM.FATIGUEMANAGER.PIs there a designated fatigue risk manager who is responsible and accountable for managing fatigue risk and fatigue countermeasures, and someone (perhaps the same person) that is authorized to review and approve HOS emergency deviations? References: 195.446(d)#

CR.CRMFMrecordPage 22CR.CRMFM.SHIFTLENGTH.RIs the scheduled shift length less than or equal to 12 hours (not including shift hand-over) or is there a documented technical basis to show that shift lengths and schedule rotations are adequate to provide controllers off- duty time sufficient to achieve 8 hours of continuous sleep? References: 195.446(d)(1)#

CR.CRMFMrecordPage 22CR.CRMFM.SHIFTLENGTHTIME.RDoes the operator factor in all time the individual is working for the company when establishing shift lengths and schedule rotations and that periods of time off that accommodates commute time or is there a documented technical basis to show that shift lengths and schedule rotations are adequate to provide controllers off-duty time sufficient to achieve 8 hours of continuous sleep? References: 195.446(d)(1)#

CR.CRMFMrecordPage 23CR.CRMFM.SCHEDULEDTIMEOFF.RAre all scheduled periods of time off at least one hour longer than 8 hours plus commute time or is there a documented technical basis to show that shift lengths and schedule rotations are adequate to provide controllers off-duty time sufficient to achieve 8 hours of continuous sleep? References: 195.446(d)(1)#

CR.CRMFMprocedurePage 23CR.CRMFM.ONCALLCONTROLLER.POn Call Controllers For controllers who are on call, do processes minimize interrupting the required 8 hours of continuous sleep or require a documented technical basis to show that shift lengths and schedule rotations are adequate to provide controllers off-duty time sufficient to achieve 8 hours of continuous sleep? References: 195.446(d)#

CR.CRMFMrecordPage 23CR.CRMFM.ONCALLCONTROLLER.ROn Call Controllers For controllers who are on call, do records include shift schedules, when calls were made to the on call employee, and how long the individual worked? References: 195.446(d)(1)#

CR.CRMFMprocedurePage 23CR.CRMFM.MAXHOS.PDo processes limit the maximum HOS limit in any sliding 7-day period to no more than 65 hours or is there a documented technical basis to show reduction of the risk associated with controller fatigue? References: 195.446(d)(4)#

CR.CRMFMprocedurePage 23CR.CRMFM.DOCSCHEDULE.PIs there a formal system to document all scheduled and unscheduled HOS worked, including overtime and time spent performing duties other than control room duties? References: 195.446(d)(4)#

CR.CRMFMprocedurePage 23CR.CRMFM.DAYSOFF.PTime Off Following Successive Days Worked For normal business hour type operations (i.e., five days per week), are no more than five days worked in succession before at least two days off? References: 195.446(d)(4)#

CR.CRMFMrecordPage 23CR.CRMFM.WORKHOURS.RDay Only Work Hours For normal business hour type operations (i.e., five days per week), do records indicate shift start times no earlier than 6:00 a.m. and shift end times no later than 7:00 p.m.? References: 195.446(d)(4)#

CR.CRMFMobservationPage 23CR.CRMFM.CONTROLLERNUMBERS.ODo operations include a sufficient number of qualified controllers? References: 195.446(d)(4)#

CR.CRMFMprocedurePage 23CR.CRMFM.OFFDUTYHOURS.PWhen Limits Reached Do processes ensure that controllers are provided with at least thirty-five (35) continuous off-duty hours when limits are reached following the most recent 35-hour (minimum) off-duty rest period or is there a documented technical basis to show that the maximum limit on controller HOS is adequate to reduce the risk associated with controller fatigue? References: 195.446(d)(4)#

CR.CRMFMprocedurePage 24CR.CRMFM.SHIFTHOLDOVER.PDoes the daily HOS limit and shift holdover process conform to shift holdover guidelines or is there a documented technical basis to show that the maximum limit on controller HOS is adequate to reduce the risk associated with controller fatigue? References: 195.446(d)(4)#

CR.CRMFMprocedurePage 24CR.CRMFM.SPECIFICCOUNTERMEASURES.PDo processes require specific fatigue countermeasures during applicable time periods, or is there a documented technical basis to show that the maximum limit on controller HOS is adequate to reduce the risk associated with controller fatigue? References: 195.446(d)(4)#

CR.CRMFMprocedurePage 24CR.CRMFM.HOSDEVIATIONS.PIs there a formal process for approving deviations from the maximum HOS limits? References: 195.446(d)(4)#

CR.CRMFMprocedurePage 24CR.CRMFM.FATIGUEEDUCATE.PDoes the program require that fatigue education/training is required for all controllers and control room supervisors? References: 195.446(d)(2), 195.446(d)(3)#

CR.CRMFMprocedurePage 24CR.CRMFM.FATIGUEREVIEW.PDo processes require that the effectiveness of the fatigue education/training program be reviewed at least once each calendar year, not to exceed 15 months? References: 195.446(d)(2), 195.446(d)(3), 195.402(a)#

CR.CRMFMprocedurePage 24CR.CRMFM.FATIGUESTRATEGY.PDoes fatigue education address fatigue mitigation strategies (countermeasures), how off-duty activities contribute to fatigue and recognizing the effects of fatigue? References: 195.446(d)(2)#

CR.CRMFMrecordPage 24CR.CRMFM.FATIGUEEDUCATE.RIs periodic fatigue education/training documented for all controllers and control room supervisors? References: 195.446(d)(2), 195.446(d)(3)#

CR.CRMFMrecordPage 24CR.CRMFM.FATIGUECONTENT.RHas controller and supervisor training to recognize the effects of fatigue been documented? References: 195.446(d)(3)#

CR.CRMAMprocedurePage 25CR.CRMAM.ALARM.PIs the alarm management plan a formal process that specifically identifies critical topical areas included in the program? References: 195.446(e)#

CR.CRMAMprocedurePage 25CR.CRMAM.ALARMMALFUNCTION.PIs there a process to identify and correct inaccurate or malfunctioning alarms? References: 195.446(e)(1)#

CR.CRMAMprocedurePage 25CR.CRMAM.ALARMREVIEW.PDoes the review of safety-related alarms account for different alarm designs and all alarm types/priorities? References: 195.446(e)(1)#

CR.CRMAMprocedurePage 25CR.CRMAM.CONTROLLERPERFORMANCE.PDoes the review of safety-related alarms account for console differences that could affect individual-specific controller qualification and performance? References: 195.446(h), 195.446(e)(1)#

CR.CRMAMprocedurePage 25CR.CRMAM.STALEDATA.PDoes the review of safety-related alarms include specific procedures and practices for managing stale or unreliable data? References: 195.446(e)(1)#

CR.CRMAMprocedurePage 25CR.CRMAM.MONTHLYANALYSIS.PDo processes require the monthly identification, recording, review, and analysis of points that have been taken off scan, have had alarms inhibited, generated false alarms, or that have had forced or manual values for periods of time exceeding that required for associated maintenance or operating activities? References: 195.446(e)(2)#

CR.CRMAMprocedurePage 25CR.CRMAM.PROBLEMCORRECTION.PDoes the alarm management plan include a process for promptly correcting identified problems and for returning these points to service? References: 195.446(e)(2)#

CR.CRMAMrecordPage 25CR.CRMAM.ALARMVERIFY.RDo records verify that monthly reviews and analysis of alarm points have been performed? References: 195.446(e)(2)#

CR.CRMAMprocedurePage 25CR.CRMAM.ALARMSETPOINTS.PIs there a formal process to determine the correct alarm setpoint values and alarm descriptions? References: 195.446(e)(3)#

CR.CRMAMprocedurePage 26CR.CRMAM.SETTINGCONTROL.PHave procedures been established to clearly address how and to what degree controllers can change alarm limits or setpoints, or inhibit alarms, or take points off-scan? References: 195.446(e)(3)#

CR.CRMAMprocedurePage 26CR.CRMAM.VERIFICATION.PDo processes require that any calibration or change to field instruments require verification of alarm setpoints and alarm descriptions? References: 195.446(e)(3)#

CR.CRMAMrecordPage 26CR.CRMAM.ALARMVALUEVERIFY.RDo records demonstrate verification of correct safety-related alarm set-point values and alarm descriptors when associated field instruments are calibrated or changed and at least once each calendar year, but at intervals not to exceed 15 months? References: 195.446(e)(3)#

CR.CRMAMprocedurePage 26CR.CRMAM.PLANREVIEW.PAre there processes to review the alarm management plan at least once each calendar year, but at intervals not exceeding 15 months, in order to determine the effectiveness of the plan? References: 195.446(e)(4)#

CR.CRMAMrecordPage 26CR.CRMAM.PLANREVIEW.RDo records indicate review of the alarm management plan at least once each calendar year, but at intervals not exceeding 15 months, in order to determine the effectiveness of the plan? References: 195.446(e)(4)#

CR.CRMAMprocedurePage 26CR.CRMAM.WORKLOAD.PDoes the CRM program have a means of identifying and measuring the work load (content and volume of general activity) being directed to an individual controller? References: 195.446(e)(5)#

CR.CRMAMprocedurePage 26CR.CRMAM.WORKLOADMONITORING.PIs the process of monitoring and analyzing general activity comprehensive? References: 195.446(e)(5)#

CR.CRMAMprocedurePage 26CR.CRMAM.CONTROLLERREACTION.PDoes the process have a means of determining that the controller has sufficient time to analyze and react to incoming alarms? References: 195.446(e)(5)#

CR.CRMAMrecordPage 26CR.CRMAM.PERFORMANCEANALYSIS.RHas an analysis been performed to determine if controller(s) performance is currently adequate? References: 195.446(e)(5)#

CR.CRMAMprocedurePage 27CR.CRMAM.DEFICIENCIES.PIs there a process to address how deficiencies found in implementing 195.446(e)(1) through 195.446(e)(5) will be resolved? References: 195.446(e)(6)#

CR.CRMAMrecordPage 27CR.CRMAM.DEFICIENCIES.RDo records indicate deficiencies found in implementing 195.446(e)(1) through 195.446(e)(5) have been resolved? References: 195.446(e)(6)#

CR.CRMCMGTprocedurePage 27CR.CRMCMGT.CHANGEMEETINGS.PIs there a process to mandate a control room representative will participate in meetings where changes that could directly or indirectly affect control room operations (including routine maintenance and repairs) are being considered, designed and implemented? References: 195.446(f)(1)#

CR.CRMCMGTrecordPage 27CR.CRMCMGT.CHANGETRAINING.RTraining on CRM Changes Before implementing changes, do records indicate controllers were provided with notification and training to assure their ability to safely incorporate the proposed change into operations? References: 195.446(f)(1)#

CR.CRMCMGTprocedurePage 27CR.CRMCMGT.EMERGENCYCONTACT.PIs there a process requiring field personnel and SCADA support personnel to contact the control room when emergency conditions exist? References: 195.446(f)(2)#

CR.CRMCMGTprocedurePage 27CR.CRMCMGT.CHANGECOORDINATION.PDoes the process assure changes in field equipment (e.g., relocating a valve or replacing a valve) that could affect control room operations are coordinated with control room personnel? References: 195.446(f)(1)#

CR.CRMCMGTrecordPage 27CR.CRMCMGT.CHANGECOORDINATION.RDo records indicate that changes in field equipment (e.g., relocating a valve or replacing a valve) that could affect control room operations were coordinated with control room personnel? References: 195.446(f)(1)#

CR.CRMCMGTprocedurePage 27CR.CRMCMGT.FIELDCONTACT.PDoes the process require field personnel and SCADA support personnel to contact the control room when making field changes (e.g., operating a valve, O&M inspections/calibrations, RTU/PLC modifications) that affect control room operations? References: 195.446(f)(2)#

CR.CRMCMGTrecordPage 28CR.CRMCMGT.FIELDCHANGES.RDo records indicate field personnel and SCADA support personnel contacted the control room when making field changes (e.g., operating a valve, O&M inspections/calibrations, RTU/PLC modifications) that affect control room operations? References: 195.446(f)(2)#

CR.CRMEXPprocedurePage 28CR.CRMEXP.REPORTABLEACCIDENTREVIEW.PIs there a formal, structured approach for reviewing and critiquing reportable events to identify lessons learned? References: 195.446(g)(1)#

CR.CRMEXPrecordPage 28CR.CRMEXP.REPORTABLEACCIDENTREVIEW.RDo records indicate reviews of reportable events specifically analyzed all contributing factors to determine if control room actions contributed to the event, and corrected any deficiencies? References: 195.446(g)(1)#

CR.CRMEXPprocedurePage 28CR.CRMEXP.LESSONSLEARNED.PDoes the program require training on lessons learned from a broad range of events (reportable incidents/accidents, near misses, leaks, operational and maintenance errors, etc.), even though the control room may not have been at fault? References: 195.446(g)(2), 195.446(b)(5)#

CR.CRMEXPrecordPage 28CR.CRMEXP.LESSONSLEARNED.RHas operating experience review training been conducted on lessons learned from a broad range of events (reportable incidents/accidents, near misses, leaks, operational and maintenance errors, etc.)? References: 195.446(g)(2), 195.446(b)(5)#

CR.CRMTRAINprocedurePage 28CR.CRMTRAIN.CONTROLLERTRAIN.PHas a controller training program been established to provide training for each controller to carry out their roles and responsibilities? References: 195.446(h)#

CR.CRMTRAINrecordPage 28CR.CRMTRAIN.CONTROLLERTRAIN.RHas a controller training program been implemented to provide training for each controller to carry out their roles and responsibilities? References: 195.446(h)#

CR.CRMTRAINprocedurePage 29CR.CRMTRAIN.TRAININGREVIEW.PHave processes been established to review the controller training program content to identify potential improvements at least once each calendar year, but at intervals not to exceed 15 months? References: 195.446(h)#

CR.CRMTRAINrecordPage 29CR.CRMTRAIN.TRAININGREVIEW.RHave processes been implemented to review the controller training program content to identify potential improvements at least once each calendar year, but at intervals not to exceed 15 months? References: 195.446(h)#

CR.CRMTRAINrecordPage 29CR.CRMTRAIN.TRAININGCONTENT.RDoes training content address all required material, including training each controller to carry out the roles and responsibilities that were defined by the operator? References: 195.446(h)#

CR.CRMTRAINrecordPage 29CR.CRMTRAIN.AOCLIST.RHas training been conducted on the abnormal operating conditions that are likely to occur simultaneously or in sequence identified by the operator? References: 195.446(h)(1)#

CR.CRMTRAINprocedurePage 29CR.CRMTRAIN.TRAININGABNORMAL.PDoes the training program provide controller training on recognizing and responding to abnormal operating conditions that are likely to occur simultaneously or in sequence? References: 195.446(h)(1)#

CR.CRMTRAINrecordPage 29CR.CRMTRAIN.TRAINING.RDoes the training program use a simulator or tabletop exercises to train controllers how to recognize and respond to abnormal operating conditions? References: 195.446(h)(2)#

CR.CRMTRAINobservationPage 29CR.CRMTRAIN.TRAINING.ODoes the training program use a simulator or tabletop exercises to train controllers how to recognize and respond to abnormal operating conditions? References: 195.446(h)(2)#

CR.CRMTRAINprocedurePage 29CR.CRMTRAIN.COMMUNICATIONTRAINING.PDoes the CRM program train controllers on their responsibilities for communication under the operator's emergency response procedures? References: 195.446(h)(3)#

CR.CRMTRAINprocedurePage 29CR.CRMTRAIN.SYSKNOWLEDGE.PDoes the training program provide controllers a working knowledge of the pipeline system, especially during the development of abnormal operating conditions? References: 195.446(h)(4)#

CR.CRMTRAINrecordPage 30CR.CRMTRAIN.INFREQOPSLIST.RHas a list of pipeline operating setups that are periodically (but infrequently) used been established? References: 195.446(h)(5)#

CR.CRMTRAINprocedurePage 30CR.CRMTRAIN.INFREQOPSREVIEW.PDo processes specify that, for pipeline operating set-ups that are periodically (but infrequently) used, the controllers must be provided an opportunity to review relevant procedures in advance of their use? References: 195.446(h)(5)#

CR.CRMTRAINprocedurePage 30CR.CRMTRAIN.TEAMTRAINPERSONNEL.PDo processes establish who, regardless of location, operationally collaborates with control room personnel? References: 195.446(h)(6)#

CR.CRMTRAINprocedurePage 30CR.CRMTRAIN.TEAMTRAINFREQ.PDo processes define the frequency of new and recurring team training? References: 195.446(h)(6)#

CR.CRMTRAINprocedurePage 30CR.CRMTRAIN.TEAMTRAINCOMPLETE.PDo processes address all operational modes and operational collaboration/control? References: 195.446(h)(6)#

CR.CRMTRAINprocedurePage 30CR.CRMTRAIN.TEAMTRAINEXPERIENCE.PDo processes include incorporation of lessons learned from actual historical events and other oil-gas industry events? References: 195.446(h)(6)#

CR.CRMTRAINrecordPage 30CR.CRMTRAIN.TEAMTRAINEXERCISE.RDo records indicate that training exercises were adequate and involved at least one qualified controller? References: 195.446(h)(6)#

CR.CRMTRAINobservationPage 30CR.CRMTRAIN.TEAMTRAINEXERCISE.ODoes implementation of a control room team exercise demonstrate performance in accordance with regulatory and process requirements? References: 195.446(h)(6)#

CR.CRMTRAINrecordPage 30CR.CRMTRAIN.TEAMTRAINIDENTINDIVIDUAL.RDo records demonstrate that individuals identified as of January 23, 2018 received team training by January 23, 2019? References: 195.446(h)(6)#

CR.CRMCOMPprocedurePage 31CR.CRMCOMP.SUBMITPROCEDURES.PAre there adequate processes to assure that the operator is responsive to requests from applicable agencies to submit their CRM procedures? References: 195.446(i)#

CR.CRMCOMPrecordPage 31CR.CRMCOMP.SUBMITPROCEDURES.RHas the operator been responsive to requests from applicable agencies to submit their CRM procedures? References: 195.446(i)#

CR.CRMCOMPprocedurePage 31CR.CRMCOMP.CRMCOORDINATOR.PIs there an individual that is responsible and accountable for compliance with requests from PHMSA or other applicable agencies? References: 195.446(i)#

CR.CRMCOMPprocedurePage 31CR.CRMCOMP.RECORDS.PAre records management processes adequate to assure records are sufficient to demonstrate compliance with the CRM rule? References: 195.446(j)(1)#

CR.CRMCOMPrecordPage 31CR.CRMCOMP.RECORDS.RAre records sufficient to demonstrate compliance with the CRM rule? References: 195.446(j)(1)#

CR.CRMCOMPrecordPage 31CR.CRMCOMP.ELECTRONICRECORDS.RAre electronic records properly stored, safeguarded, and readily retrievable? References: 195.446(j)(1)#

CR.CRMCOMPprocedurePage 31CR.CRMCOMP.DEVIATIONS.PAre there processes to demonstrate and provide a documented record that every deviation from any CRM rule requirement was necessary for safe operation? References: 195.446(j)(2)#

CR.CRMCOMPrecordPage 31CR.CRMCOMP.DEVIATIONS.RDeviation Records Were all deviations documented in a way that demonstrates they were necessary for safe operation? References: 195.446(j)(2)#

CR.LDprocedurePage 32CR.LD.LDEVAL.PDoes the process adequately address the evaluation of the operators leak detection system and require modification as necessary? References: 195.444(a), 195.444(b), 195.452(i)(3)#

CR.LDprocedurePage 32CR.LD.LDEFFECTIVE.PDo the processes adequately describe that the operator has an effective system for detecting leaks? References: 195.402(a), 195.134(a), 195.134(b), 195.444(a), 195.444(b)#

CR.LDrecordPage 32CR.LD.EVAL.RDo records show that the operator evaluated the capability of its leak detection system to protect the public, property, and the environment and modified as necessary? References: 195.444(a), 195.444(b), 195.134(a), 195.134(b)#

CR.LDrecordPage 32CR.LD.LDSYSTEM.RDo records demonstrate the operator’s leak detection system is performing within the system design requirements? References: 195.404(c), 195.134(b), 195.444(b)#

CR.LDprocedurePage 32CR.LD.LDTRAINING.PDo the processes define and require that pipeline controllers are trained to recognize leaks based on the system implemented? References: 195.505(h)#

CR.LDrecordPage 32CR.LD.LDTRAINING.RDo records show that pipeline controllers are trained to recognize leaks using the chosen leak detection method/system? References: 195.507(a), 195.507(b)#

CR.LDobservationPage 32CR.LD.LDTRAINING.OAre the Pipeline Controllers trained to recognize leaks? References: 195.505#

CR.LDprocedurePage 32CR.LD.ALARMDISPLAY.PDo the processes define and describe the alarms appropriate for the leak detection system implemented? References: 195.444(b)#

CR.LDobservationPage 32CR.LD.ALARMDISPLAY.OAre the Leak Detection alarms adequate? References: 195.444(b)#

CR.LDprocedurePage 33CR.LD.LDSTEST.PDo the processes define and describe the testing of the Leak Detection System? References: 195.444(b), 195.134(b)#

CR.LDrecordPage 33CR.LD.LDSTEST.RHave leak detection system testing records and results been retained/available and indicate adequate results? References: 195.134(b), 195.444(b)#

CR.LDprocedurePage 33CR.LD.LDSMOC.PAre parameter and/or system changes required to be reflected in the leak detection system? References: 195.444(b), 195.134(b)#

CR.LDprocedurePage 33CR.LD.LDSCADA.PAre the leak detection system data, communication, and controller interfaces appropriately integrated with the SCADA displays? References: 195.134(b), 195.444(b)#

CR.LDprocedurePage 33CR.LD.LDSINSTRUMENT.PIs the accuracy and calibration of field instrumentation used in the leak detection system appropriately assured? References: 195.134(b), 195.444(b)#

CR.LDrecordPage 33CR.LD.LDSINSTRUMENT.RDo records indicate the calibration of field instrumentation used in the leak detection system was performed? References: 195.444(b), 195.446(j)#

CR.LDprocedurePage 33CR.LD.LDSPROTECT.PIs the Leak Detection System adequately protected from security threats? References: 195.402(a)#

CR.CPMrecordPage 33CR.CPM.CPMSYS.RDo records demonstrate the operator has identified, considered, or implemented CPM leak detection measures to mitigate the consequences of a pipeline failure? References: 195.446(g), 195.452(i)(3)#

CR.CPMprocedurePage 34CR.CPM.CPMOUTPUT.PWhat is the output of the CPM System? References: 195.402(a), 195.446(b)#

CR.CPMprocedurePage 34CR.CPM.ALARMLOOP.PIs automatic closed-loop control response to alarm conditions used? References: 195.402(a), 195.446(c), 195.446(e)#

CR.CPMprocedurePage 34CR.CPM.CPM.PIf Computational Pipeline Monitoring (CPM) is used, does it comply with guidance in API 1130(3rd Edition) requirements in operating, maintaining, testing, record-keeping, and dispatcher training? References: 195.402(a), 195.444(c), 195.446(b), 195.446(c)#

CR.CPMprocedurePage 34CR.CPM.CPMTRAINING.PAre the Pipeline Controllers trained in the recognition of CPM alarms? References: 195.444(b), 195.444(c), 195.505(h)#

CR.CPMrecordPage 34CR.CPM.CPMTRAINING.RDo records show that pipeline controllers are trained to recognize Leaks using the chosen leak detection method/system? References: 195.444(b), 195.444(c), 195.505(h)#

CR.CPMobservationPage 34CR.CPM.CPMTRAINING.OAre the Pipeline Controllers trained in the recognition of CPM alarms? References: 195.444(b), 195.444(c), 195.505(h)#

CR.CPMprocedurePage 34CR.CPM.ALARMDISPLAY.PAre alarms in compliance with Section 5.4.3 of API 1130(3rd Edition)? References: 195.444(c)#

CR.CPMprocedurePage 34CR.CPM.ALARMCRED.PDo alarms conform to API-1130(3rd Edition)? References: 195.444(c), 195.134, 195.446(e)#

CR.CPMprocedurePage 34CR.CPM.CPMSTEST.PDoes testing of the CPM System conform to API-1130(3rd Edition)? References: 195.444(c), 195.134#

CR.CPMprocedurePage 35CR.CPM.CPMSTESTINITIAL.PDoes initial testing of the CPM System conform to API-1130(3rd Edition)? References: 195.134(c)#

CR.CPMrecordPage 35CR.CPM.CPMSTESTINITIAL.RHave initial system testing records and results been retained/available and indicate adequate results? References: 195.134(c)#

CR.CPMprocedurePage 35CR.CPM.CPMSMOC.PAre parameter and/or system changes required to be reflected in the leak detection system? References: 195.444(b), 195.134, 195.444(c)#

CR.CPMprocedurePage 35CR.CPM.CPMSCADA.PAre the CPM system data, communication, and controller interfaces appropriately integrated with the SCADA displays? References: 195.134(b), 195.134(c), 195.446(c), 195.444(b), 195.444(c)#

CR.CPMprocedurePage 35CR.CPM.CPMSINSTRUMENT.PIs the accuracy and calibration of field instrumentation used in the leak detection system appropriately assured? References: 195.444(b), 195.134(b), 195.134(c), 195.444(c)#

CR.CPMrecordPage 35CR.CPM.CPMSINSTRUMENT.RDo records indicate the calibration of field instrumentation used in the leak detection system was performed? References: 195.444(b), 195.444(c), 195.446(j)#

CR.CPMprocedurePage 35CR.CPM.CPMPROTECT.PIs the CPM system adequately protected from security threats? References: 195.402(a)#

DC.DNrecordPage 35DC.DN.CHEMCOMPATIBLE.RDo records verify determination that the product to be transported (hazardous liquids, CO2, biofuels) is chemically compatible with the pipeline, its components, and other commodities? References: 195.4#

DC.DNprocedurePage 36DC.DN.DESIGN.PDoes the process require certain Subpart C design requirements relating to biofuel transport be addressed? References: 195.100, 195.116(c), 195.126, 195.118(c)#

DC.DNrecordPage 36DC.DN.DESIGN.RDo records indicate that certain Subpart C design requirements relating to biofuel transport have been addressed? References: 195.100, 195.116(c), 195.126, 195.118(c)#

DC.DNrecordPage 36DC.DN.CONSTRUCT.RDo records indicate certain Subpart D construction requirements relating to biofuel transport have been addressed? References: 195.200, 195.260(c), 195.262(e)#

DC.DNrecordPage 36DC.DN.METALLIC.RDo records indicate metallic components other than pipe have been qualified for use? References: 195.101(a), 195.101(b)#

DC.DNrecordPage 36DC.DN.VALVEBIOFUELS.RDo records indicate pipeline system valves meet the compatibility requirements of 195.116(c)? References: 195.116(c)#

DC.COprocedurePage 36DC.CO.SPECS.PDoes the operator have written construction specifications or standards as required of 195.202? References: 195.202#

DC.COrecordPage 36DC.CO.SPECS.RDo the operator's written records demonstrate compliance with their written specifications or as required by 195.202? References: 195.202#

DC.COobservationPage 37DC.CO.SPECS.ODo observations validate operator compliance with specifications or standards? References: 195.202#

DC.COprocedurePage 37DC.CO.INSPECTION.PDoes the process specify that prior to installation, pipe and components are visually inspected at the site of installation to ensure they are not damaged? References: 195.202, 195.206#

DC.COobservationPage 37DC.CO.INSPECTION.OMaterial Inspection Prior to installation, are pipe and components visually inspected at the site of installation to ensure they are not damaged? References: 195.206#

DC.COprocedurePage 37DC.CO.TRUCKTRANSPORT.PDoes the operator have specifications requiring that TRUCK transportation for certain pipe (see considerations) is in accordance with §195.207(c) and API RP 5LT(1st Edition) ? References: 195.202, 195.207(c)#

DC.COrecordPage 37DC.CO.TRUCKTRANSPORT.RDoes the operator have records showing that truck transportation for certain pipe (see considerations) is in accordance with §195.207(c) and API RP 5LT(1st Edition)? References: 195.207(c)#

DC.COobservationPage 37DC.CO.TRUCKTRANSPORT.ODo field observations confirm that the operator has performed truck transportation for certain pipe (see considerations) in accordance with §195.207(c) and API RP 5LT(1st Edition)? References: 195.207(c)#

DC.COprocedurePage 37DC.CO.RAILTRANSPORT.PDoes the operator have specifications requiring that Railroad transportation for certain pipe (see considerations) is in accordance with §195.207(a) and API RP 5L1(7th Edition)? References: 195.202, 195.207(a)#

DC.COrecordPage 37DC.CO.RAILTRANSPORT.RDoes the operator have records showing that Railroad transportation for certain pipe (see considerations) is in accordance with §195.207(a) and API RP 5L1(7th Edition)? References: 195.207(a)#

DC.COobservationPage 37DC.CO.RAILTRANSPORT.ODo field observations confirm that Railroad transportation for certain pipe (see considerations) was in accordance with §195.207(a) and API RP 5L1(7th Edition)? References: 195.207(a)#

DC.COprocedurePage 38DC.CO.SHIPBARGETRANSPORT.PDoes the operator have specifications requiring that Ship or Barge transportation for certain pipe (see considerations) is in accordance with §195.207(b) and API RP 5LW(3rd Edition)? References: 195.202, 195.207(b)#

DC.COrecordPage 38DC.CO.SHIPBARGETRANSPORT.RDoes the operator have records showing that Ship or Barge transportation for certain pipe (see considerations) is in accordance with §195.207(b) and API RP 5LW(3rd Edition)? References: 195.207(b)#

DC.COobservationPage 38DC.CO.SHIPBARGETRANSPORT.ODo field observations confirm that the operator has used Ship or Barge transportation for certain pipe (see considerations) in accordance with §195.207(b) and API RP 5LW(3rd Edition)? References: 195.207(b)#

DC.COprocedurePage 38DC.CO.LOCATION.PDoes the process specify the required pipeline location (and any additional depth of cover requirements)? References: 195.202, 195.210(a), 195.210(b)#

DC.COrecordPage 38DC.CO.LOCATION.RDo records indicate the required pipeline location (and any additional depth of cover requirements)? References: 195.210(a), 195.210(b)#

DC.COobservationPage 38DC.CO.LOCATION.ODo observed pipeline locations (and any additional depth of cover) comply with 195.210? References: 195.210(a), 195.210(b)#

DC.COprocedurePage 38DC.CO.INSTALL.PDoes the process require that pipe is installed in a manner that minimizes secondary stresses and the possibility of damage to the pipe and coating? References: 195.202, 195.246(a)#

DC.COrecordPage 38DC.CO.INSTALL.RDo records demonstrate that pipe is installed in a manner that minimizes secondary stresses and the possibility of damage to the pipe and coating? References: 195.202, 195.246(a)#

DC.COobservationPage 38DC.CO.INSTALL.OIs pipe installed in a manner that minimizes secondary stresses and minimizes possibility of damage to pipe and coating? References: 195.246(a)#

DC.COprocedurePage 39DC.CO.INSTALLOFFSHORE.PDoes the process specify that off shore piping is installed so that the top of the pipe is below the underwater natural bottom or as otherwise allowed by 195.246(b)? References: 195.202, 195.246(b)#

DC.COrecordPage 39DC.CO.INSTALLOFFSHORE.RDo records indicate offshore piping was installed so that the top of the pipe is below the underwater natural bottom or as otherwise allowed by 195.246(b)? References: 195.246(b)#

DC.COprocedurePage 39DC.CO.COVER.PDoes the process specify that piping is installed with a depth of cover as specified in 195.248? References: 195.202, 195.248(a), 195.248(b), 195.210(b)#

DC.COrecordPage 39DC.CO.COVER.RDo records indicate that piping is installed with a depth of cover as specified in 195.248? References: 195.266(b), 195.248(a), 195.248(b)#

DC.COobservationPage 39DC.CO.COVER.ODo field observations confirm piping is installed with a depth of cover as specified in 195.248? References: 195.248(a), 195.248(b)#

DC.COprocedurePage 39DC.CO.INSTALLABOVEGRND.PDoes the process specify that above ground components are installed as allowed by 195.254? References: 195.202, 195.254(a), 195.254(b)#

DC.COrecordPage 39DC.CO.INSTALLABOVEGRND.RDo records verify that above ground components are installed as allowed by 195.254? References: 195.266, 195.254(a), 195.254(b)#

DC.COobservationPage 39DC.CO.INSTALLABOVEGRND.OAre above ground components installed as allowed by 195.254? References: 195.254(a), 195.254(b)#

DC.COprocedurePage 39DC.CO.VALVEPROTECT.PDoes the process specify that valves are accessible to authorized employees and protected from damage or tampering? References: 195.258(a)#

DC.COrecordPage 40DC.CO.VALVEPROTECT.RDo records indicate that valves were constructed to provide adequate accessibility and space for authorized employees and protected from damage or tampering? References: 195.266(f), 195.258(a)#

DC.COobservationPage 40DC.CO.VALVEPROTECT.OAre valves accessible to authorized employees and protected from damage or tampering? References: 195.258(a)#

DC.COprocedurePage 40DC.CO.VALVEMARKOFFSHORE.PDoes the process specify that offshore submerged valves are located or marked in order to facilitate quick location when operation of the valve is required? References: 195.202, 195.258(b)#

DC.COrecordPage 40DC.CO.VALVEMARKOFFSHORE.RAre offshore submerged valves located or marked in order to facilitate quick location when operation of the valve is required? References: 195.266(f), 195.258(b)#

DC.COprocedurePage 40DC.CO.VALVEMARKNAVWATER.PDo written specifications or standards and drawings specify that submerged valves located in inland navigable waters are located or marked in order to facilitate quick location when operation of the valve is required? References: 195.202, 195.258(b)#

DC.COobservationPage 40DC.CO.VALVEMARKNAVWATER.OAre submerged valves located in inland navigable waters located or marked in order to facilitate quick location when operation of the valve is required? References: 195.258(b)#

DC.COprocedurePage 40DC.CO.VALVELOCATION.PDo written specifications or standards specify valves to be located as required? References: 195.202, 195.260(a), 195.260(b), 195.260(c), 195.260(d), 195.260(e), 195.260(f), 195.260(g)#

DC.COrecordPage 40DC.CO.VALVELOCATION.RDo records indicate that valves are located as specified by §195.260? References: 195.266(f), 195.260(a), 195.260(b), 195.260(c), 195.260(d), 195.260(e), 195.260(f), 195.260(g)#

DC.COobservationPage 40DC.CO.VALVELOCATION.ODo field observations verify valves are located as specified by §195.260? References: 195.260(a), 195.260(b), 195.260(c), 195.260(d), 195.260(e), 195.260(f), 195.260(g)#

DC.COprocedurePage 41DC.CO.FIELDBEND.PDoes the construction process meet the requirements of 195.212 for bending pipe? References: 195.202, 195.212(a), 195.212(b), 195.212(c)#

DC.COobservationPage 41DC.CO.FIELDBEND.ODoes pipe bending meet the requirements of 195.212? References: 195.212(a), 195.212(b), 195.212(c)#

DC.COprocedurePage 41DC.CO.RECORDS.PDoes the process require applicable construction records to be maintained for the life of each pipeline? References: 195.202, 195.266(a), 195.266(b), 195.266(c), 195.266(d), 195.266(e), 195.266(f)#

DC.COrecordPage 41DC.CO.RECORDS.RDo records indicate that construction records are being maintained for the life of each pipeline? References: 195.266(a), 195.266(b), 195.266(c), 195.266(d), 195.266(e), 195.266(f)#

DC.COprocedurePage 41DC.CO.CLEAR.PDoes clearance requirements between pipe and underground structures comply with 195.250? References: 195.202, 195.250#

DC.COrecordPage 41DC.CO.CLEAR.RDo records demonstrate that clearance requirements between pipe and underground structures comply with 195.250? References: 195.202, 195.250#

DC.COobservationPage 41DC.CO.CLEAR.ODoes clearance between pipe and underground structures comply with 195.250? References: 195.250#

DC.COprocedurePage 41DC.CO.BACKFILL.PIs backfilling required to be performed in a manner that provides firm support and does not damage the pipe and coating? References: 195.202, 195.252(a), 195.252(b)#

DC.COrecordPage 41DC.CO.BACKFILL.RDo records demonstrate that backfilling is required to be performed in a manner that provides firm support and does not damage the pipe and coating? References: 195.202, 195.252#

DC.COobservationPage 42DC.CO.BACKFILL.OIs backfilling performed in a manner that provides firm support and does not damage the pipe and coating? References: 195.252(a), 195.252(b)#

DC.COprocedurePage 42DC.CO.EXTLOADXINGS.PIs pipe at railroad and highway crossings required to be installed to adequately withstand dynamic forces exerted by anticipated traffic loads? References: 195.202, 195.256#

DC.COrecordPage 42DC.CO.EXTLOADXINGS.RDo records indicate pipe at selected railroad and highway crossings was installed to adequately withstand dynamic forces exerted by anticipated traffic loads? References: 195.266(b), 195.256#

DC.COobservationPage 42DC.CO.EXTLOADXINGS.ODo field observations verify pipe being installed at railroad and highway crossings is adequate to withstand dynamic forces exerted by anticipated traffic loads? References: 195.202, 195.256#

DC.COprocedurePage 42DC.CO.ASVFLOWMODEL.PDo the operator’s procedures adequately describe and require flow modeling for ASVs? References: 195.202, 195.419(f)#

DC.COrecordPage 42DC.CO.ASVFLOWMODEL.RDo the records demonstrate the flow modeling was conducted as required in accordance with §195.419? References: 195.202, 195.419(f)#

DC.COprocedurePage 42DC.CO.RMVINSTALLHCA.PDo the operator’s specifications require RMVs or AETs located in could affect or HCA areas to be installed to meet the appropriate valve spacing requirements? References: 195.202, 195.258(c), 195.258(d), 195.258(e), 195.419#

DC.COrecordPage 42DC.CO.RMVINSTALLHCA.RDo records demonstrate RMVs or AETs were located in could affect or HCA areas to meet the appropriate valve spacing requirements? References: 195.202, 195.258(c), 195.258(d), 195.258(e), 195.419#

DC.COprocedurePage 42DC.CO.RMVINSTALL.PDo the operator’s specifications require RMVs or AETs to be installed to meet the appropriate valve spacing requirements? References: 195.202, 195.258(c), 195.258(d), 195.258(e), 195.419#

DC.COrecordPage 43DC.CO.RMVINSTALL.RDo the records demonstrate RMVs or AETs were installed to meet the appropriate valve spacing requirements? References: 195.266(f), 195.258(c), 195.258(d), 195.258(e), 195.419#

DC.COobservationPage 43DC.CO.RMVINSTALL.ODo field observations verify that RMVs or alternative equivalent technologies were installed to meet the appropriate valve spacing requirements? References: 195.202, 195.258(c), 195.258(d), 195.258(e), 195.419#

DC.PSobservationPage 43DC.PS.INSPECTION.OMaterial Inspection Prior to installation, are pipe and components visually inspected at the site of installation to ensure they are not damaged? References: 195.206#

DC.PSprocedurePage 43DC.PS.INSTALL.PDoes the process require that pipe is installed in a manner that minimizes secondary stresses and the possibility of damage to the pipe and coating? References: 195.202, 195.246(a)#

DC.PSobservationPage 43DC.PS.INSTALL.OIs pipe installed in a manner that minimizes secondary stresses and minimizes possibility of damage to pipe and coating? References: 195.246(a)#

DC.PSprocedurePage 43DC.PS.COVER.PDoes the process specify that piping is installed with a depth of cover as specified in 195.248? References: 195.202, 195.248(a)#

DC.PSrecordPage 43DC.PS.COVER.RDo records indicate that piping is installed with a depth of cover as specified in 195.248? References: 195.266(b), 195.248(a)#

DC.PSobservationPage 43DC.PS.COVER.ODo field observations confirm piping is installed with a depth of cover as specified in 195.248? References: 195.248(a)#

DC.PSprocedurePage 44DC.PS.INSTALLABOVEGRND.PDoes the process specify that above ground components are installed as allowed by 195.254? References: 195.202, 195.254(a), 195.254(b)#

DC.PSrecordPage 44DC.PS.INSTALLABOVEGRND.RDo records verify that above ground components are installed as allowed by 195.254? References: 195.266, 195.254(a), 195.254(b)#

DC.PSobservationPage 44DC.PS.INSTALLABOVEGRND.OAre above ground components installed as allowed by 195.254? References: 195.254(a), 195.254(b)#

DC.PSprocedurePage 44DC.PS.VALVEPROTECT.PDoes the process specify that valves are accessible to authorized employees and protected from damage or tampering? References: 195.258(a)#

DC.PSrecordPage 44DC.PS.VALVEPROTECT.RDo records indicate that valves are accessible to authorized employees and protected from damage or tampering? References: 195.266(f), 195.258(a)#

DC.PSobservationPage 44DC.PS.VALVEPROTECT.OAre valves accessible to authorized employees and protected from damage or tampering? References: 195.258(a)#

DC.PSprocedurePage 44DC.PS.VALVELOCATION.PDoes the process specify that valves are located as specified by 195.260? References: 195.202, 195.260(a), 195.260(b), 195.260(c), 195.260(d), 195.260(e), 195.260(f)#

DC.PSrecordPage 44DC.PS.VALVELOCATION.RDo records indicate that valves are located as specified by 195.260? References: 195.266(f), 195.260(a), 195.260(b), 195.260(c), 195.260(d), 195.260(e), 195.260(f)#

DC.PSobservationPage 44DC.PS.VALVELOCATION.OAre valves located as specified by 195.260? References: 195.260(a), 195.260(b), 195.260(c), 195.260(d), 195.260(e), 195.260(f)#

DC.PSprocedurePage 45DC.PS.PMPSPEC.PDoes the process require pumping equipment to meet the requirements 195.262? References: 195.202, 195.262(a), 195.262(b), 195.262(c), 195.262(d), 195.262(e)#

DC.PSobservationPage 45DC.PS.PMPVENTILATE.OIs adequate ventilation provided in pump station buildings to prevent the accumulation of hazardous vapors? References: 195.262(a)#

DC.PSobservationPage 45DC.PS.PMPVAPOR.ODo pumping station buildings have devices to warn of the presence of hazardous vapors? References: 195.262(a)#

DC.PSprocedurePage 45DC.PS.PMPOVERPRESS.PDoes the process specify that pumping stations have overpressure safety devices and emergency shutdown capability? References: 195.202, 195.262(b)#

DC.PSobservationPage 45DC.PS.PMPOVERPRESS.ODo pumping stations have overpressure safety devices and emergency shutdown capability? References: 195.262(b)#

DC.PSrecordPage 45DC.PS.PMPSAFETYDEVICETEST.RDo records indicate safety devices tested before pumping stations used? References: 195.262(c)#

DC.PSobservationPage 45DC.PS.PMPSAFETYDEVICETEST.ODo field observations verify safety devices are/were tested before pumping stations are used? References: 195.262(c)#

DC.PSobservationPage 45DC.PS.PMPPROPERTY.OIs pumping equipment installed on property that is under the control of the operator and at least 15.2 m (50 ft) from the boundary of the pump station? References: 195.262(d)#

DC.PSobservationPage 45DC.PS.PMPFIREPROT.OIs fire protection installed at each pump station? References: 195.262(e)#

DC.PSprocedurePage 46DC.PS.INSPECTION.PDoes the process specify that prior to installation, pipe and components are visually inspected at the site of installation to ensure they are not damaged? References: 195.202, 195.206#

DC.PSprocedurePage 46DC.PS.FIELDBEND.PDoes the construction process meet the requirements of 195.212 for bending pipe? References: 195.202, 195.212(a), 195.212(b), 195.212(c)#

DC.PSobservationPage 46DC.PS.FIELDBEND.ODoes pipe bending meet the requirements of 195.212? References: 195.212(a), 195.212(b), 195.212(c)#

DC.PSprocedurePage 46DC.PS.RECORDS.PDoes the process require applicable construction records to be maintained for the life of each pipeline? References: 195.202, 195.266(a), 195.266(b), 195.266(c), 195.266(d), 195.266(e), 195.266(f)#

DC.PSrecordPage 46DC.PS.RECORDS.RDo records indicate that construction records are being maintained for the life of each pipeline? References: 195.266(a), 195.266(b), 195.266(c), 195.266(d), 195.266(e), 195.266(f)#

DC.PSprocedurePage 46DC.PS.CLEAR.PDo clearance requirements between pipe and underground structures comply with 195.250? References: 195.202, 195.250#

DC.PSobservationPage 46DC.PS.CLEAR.ODoes the clearance between pipe and underground structures comply with 195.250? References: 195.250#

DC.PSprocedurePage 46DC.PS.BACKFILL.PIs backfilling required to be performed in a manner that provides firm support and does not damage the pipe and coating? References: 195.202, 195.252(a), 195.252(b)#

DC.PSobservationPage 46DC.PS.BACKFILL.OIs backfilling performed in a manner that provides firm support and does not damage the pipe and coating? References: 195.252(a), 195.252(b)#

DC.WELDINSPprocedurePage 47DC.WELDINSP.WELDINSPECT.PAre welds required to be inspected to ensure compliance with the requirements of 195.228? References: 195.228(a), 195.228(b)#

DC.WELDINSPrecordPage 47DC.WELDINSP.WELDINSPECT.RDo records indicate welds are inspected to ensure compliance with the requirements of 195.228? References: 195.228(a), 195.228(b), 195.234#

DC.WELDINSPobservationPage 47DC.WELDINSP.WELDINSPECT.OAre welds being inspected to ensure compliance with the requirements of 195.228? References: 195.228(a), 195.228(b), 195.234#

DC.WELDINSPprocedurePage 47DC.WELDINSP.WELDREPAIR.PAre welds that are unacceptable required to be removed and/or repaired as specified by 195.230 and are repair procedures in place? References: 195.202, 195.230(a), 195.230(b), 195.230(c)#

DC.WELDINSPrecordPage 47DC.WELDINSP.WELDREPAIR.RDo records indicate that unacceptable welds are removed and/or repaired? References: 195.230(a), 195.230(b), 195.230(c)#

DC.WELDINSPobservationPage 47DC.WELDINSP.WELDREPAIR.OAre unacceptable welds being removed and/or repaired? References: 195.230(a), 195.230(b), 195.230(c)#

DC.WELDINSPprocedurePage 47DC.WELDINSP.WELDNDT.PAre there processes for nondestructive testing and for determining standards of acceptability? References: 195.234(a), 195.234(b), 195.234(c)#

DC.WELDINSPrecordPage 47DC.WELDINSP.WELDNDT.RDo records indicate adequate nondestructive testing and determination of standards of acceptability? References: 195.234(a), 195.234(b), 195.234(c)#

DC.WELDINSPobservationPage 48DC.WELDINSP.WELDNDT.OAre NDT activities performed in accordance with approved processes? References: 195.234(a), 195.234(b), 195.234(c)#

DC.WELDINSPprocedurePage 48DC.WELDINSP.WELDNDTQUAL.PDoes the process require nondestructive testing of welds (for maintenance and construction) be performed by personnel who are trained in procedures established to ensure compliance with 195.228 and in use of the testing equipment? References: 195.202, 195.234(b)(2)#

DC.WELDINSPprocedurePage 48DC.WELDINSP.GIRTHWELDNDT.PDoes the process require certain girth welds to be nondestructively tested in accordance with 195.234(d), (e), (f), and (g)? References: 195.202, 195.234(d), 195.234(e), 195.234(f), 195.234(g), 195.266#

DC.WELDINSPrecordPage 48DC.WELDINSP.GIRTHWELDNDT.RDo records demonstrate at least 10% of all welds that are made by each welder during each welding day are nondestructively tested over the entire circumference of the welds or that more welds are tested per the operator's own procedures? References: 195.234(d), 195.266(a)#

DC.WELDINSPrecordPage 48DC.WELDINSP.GIRTHWELDNDTLOCATE.RDo records demonstrate all girth welds installed each day in selected locations specified in 195.234(e) are nondestructively tested over their entire circumference? References: 195.234(e), 195.266(a)#

DC.WELDINSPrecordPage 48DC.WELDINSP.GIRTHWELDNDTUSED.RDo records demonstrate that when installing used pipe, 100% of the old girth welds are nondestructively tested? References: 195.234(f), 195.266(a)#

DC.WELDINSPrecordPage 48DC.WELDINSP.GIRTHWELDNDTTIEIN.RDo records demonstrate 100% of the girth welds have been nondestructively tested at selected pipe tie-ins? References: 195.234(g), 195.266(a)#

DC.WELDERQUALprocedurePage 49DC.WELDERQUAL.WELDERQUAL.PIs each welder required to be qualified in accordance with section 6 of API 1104 (21st Edition)or section IX of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code (2007)? References: 195.222(a), 195.222(b)#

DC.WELDERQUALrecordPage 49DC.WELDERQUAL.WELDERQUAL.RDo records indicate that welders are qualified in accordance with API-Std-1104 (21st Edition) or the ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code (2007)? References: 195.222(a), 195.222(b), 195.214(a)#

DC.WELDERQUALobservationPage 49DC.WELDERQUAL.WELDERQUAL.OAre welders performing welds according to established procedures? References: 195.222(a), 195.222(b), 195.214(a), 195.505(b)#

DC.WELDPROCEDUREprocedurePage 49DC.WELDPROCEDURE.WELDSUPPORT.PDoes the procedure prohibit supports or braces to be welded directly to pipe that operates at a pressure greater than 100 psi (689 kPa) gage? References: 195.202, 195.208#

DC.WELDPROCEDUREobservationPage 49DC.WELDPROCEDURE.WELDSUPPORT.OAre supports or braces observed to be welded directly to pipe that operates at a pressure greater than 100 psi (689 kPa) gauge? References: 195.208#

DC.WELDPROCEDUREprocedurePage 49DC.WELDPROCEDURE.WELD.PDoes the process require welding to be performed by qualified welders using qualified welding procedures? References: 195.214(a)#

DC.WELDPROCEDUREobservationPage 49DC.WELDPROCEDURE.WELD.OAre welding procedures being qualified in accordance with 195.214? References: 195.214(a)#

DC.WELDPROCEDUREprocedurePage 50DC.WELDPROCEDURE.WELDPROCEDURE.PAre welding procedures and qualifying tests required to be recorded in detail? References: 195.214(b)#

DC.WELDPROCEDURErecordPage 50DC.WELDPROCEDURE.WELDPROCEDURE.RDo records indicate welding procedures and qualifying tests recorded in detail? References: 195.214(b)#

DC.WELDPROCEDUREobservationPage 50DC.WELDPROCEDURE.WELDPROCEDURE.OAre welding procedures being retained and followed? References: 195.214(b)#

DC.WELDPROCEDUREprocedurePage 50DC.WELDPROCEDURE.MITERJOINT.PDo welding procedures prohibit the use of miter joints? References: 195.214(b), 195.216#

DC.WELDPROCEDUREprocedurePage 50DC.WELDPROCEDURE.WELDWEATHER.PIs welding required to be protected from weather conditions that would impair the quality of the completed weld? References: 195.224#

DC.WELDPROCEDUREobservationPage 50DC.WELDPROCEDURE.WELDWEATHER.OIs welding protected from weather conditions that would impair the quality of the completed weld? References: 195.224#

DC.WELDPROCEDUREprocedurePage 50DC.WELDPROCEDURE.ARCBURNGRNDWIRE.PDoes the process address arc burns and ground wires in accordance with 195.226? References: 195.202, 195.226(a), 195.226(b), 195.226(c)#

DC.WELDPROCEDURErecordPage 50DC.WELDPROCEDURE.ARCBURNGRNDWIRE.RDo records indicate arc burns and ground wires are addressed in accordance with 195.226? References: 195.226(a), 195.226(b), 195.226(c)#

DC.WELDPROCEDUREobservationPage 51DC.WELDPROCEDURE.ARCBURNGRNDWIRE.OAre arc burns and ground wires addressed in accordance with 195.226? References: 195.226(a), 195.226(b), 195.226(c)#

DC.WELDPROCEDUREprocedurePage 51DC.WELDPROCEDURE.WELDINSERVICE.PDoes the process require consideration of issues related to welding on in-service pipelines? References: 195.402(a), 195.422(a)#

DC.DNprocedurePage 51DC.DN.TEMPDESIGNCO2.PDoes the process require that carbon dioxide system components subject to low temperatures are made of materials that are suitable for those low temperatures? References: 195.102(b)#

DC.DNrecordPage 51DC.DN.TEMPDESIGNCO2.RDo records indicate carbon dioxide system components subject to low temperatures are made of materials that are suitable for those low temperatures? References: 195.102(b)#

DC.DNrecordPage 51DC.DN.OVERPRESS.RDo records indicate the system is designed so that the lowest pressure rated component will not be overstressed at the pipeline MOP? References: 195.104#

DC.DNobservationPage 51DC.DN.OVERPRESS.OAre the lowest pressure rated components operating below overstress pressures? References: 195.104#

DC.DNprocedurePage 51DC.DN.DESIGNPRESS.PDoes the process require the internal design pressure of the pipeline (or pipe) be determined in accordance with 195.106? References: 195.106(a), 195.106(b), 195.106(c), 195.106(d), 195.106(e)#

DC.DNrecordPage 51DC.DN.DESIGNPRESS.RDo records demonstrate the internal design pressure of the pipeline (or pipe) is determined in accordance with 195.106? References: 195.106(a), 195.106(b), 195.106(c), 195.106(d), 195.106(e)#

DC.DNrecordPage 52DC.DN.EXTERNALPRESS.RDo records indicate the system is designed such that all external pressure that will be exerted on the pipe have been accounted for? References: 195.108#

DC.DNobservationPage 52DC.DN.EXTERNALPRESS.OHave all external pressures exerted on the pipe been accounted for? References: 195.108#

DC.DNprocedurePage 52DC.DN.EXTLOAD.PDoes the process require pipeline designs to account for anticipated external loads? References: 195.110(a), 195.110(b)#

DC.DNrecordPage 52DC.DN.EXTLOAD.RDo records demonstrate pipeline designs account for anticipated external loads? References: 195.110(a), 195.110(b)#

DC.DNobservationPage 52DC.DN.EXTLOAD.ODo field observations verify pipeline designs account for anticipated external loads? References: 195.110(a), 195.110(b)#

DC.DNprocedurePage 52DC.DN.CO2FRACPROP.PDoes the process require provisions to mitigate the effects of fracture propagation in carbon dioxide pipeline systems? References: 195.111#

DC.DNrecordPage 52DC.DN.CO2FRACPROP.RDo records indicate provisions to mitigate the effects of fracture propagation in carbon dioxide pipeline systems? References: 195.111#

DC.DNobservationPage 52DC.DN.CO2FRACPROP.ODo observations on the right-of-way support that the CO2 pipeline design is being followed? References: 195.111#

DC.DNprocedurePage 52DC.DN.NEWPIPE.PDoes the process require that new pipe installed in a pipeline system comply with 195.112? References: 195.112(a), 195.112(b), 195.112(c)#

DC.DNrecordPage 53DC.DN.NEWPIPE.RDo records demonstrate new pipe installed in a pipeline system complies with §195.112? References: 195.112(a), 195.112(b), 195.112(c)#

DC.DNobservationPage 53DC.DN.NEWPIPE.OIs new pipe is marked in accordance with the requirements of 195.112(c)? References: 195.112(c)#

DC.DNrecordPage 53DC.DN.USEDPIPE.RDo records demonstrate used pipe installed in a pipeline system complies with 195.114? References: 195.114(a), 195.114(b)#

DC.DNobservationPage 53DC.DN.USEDPIPE.ODoes used pipe installed in a pipeline system comply with 195.114? References: 195.114(b)#

DC.DNprocedurePage 53DC.DN.VALVE.PDoes the process require pipeline system valves meet the requirements of §195.116? References: 195.116(a), 195.116(b), 195.116(c), 195.116(d), 195.116(e), 195.116(f)#

DC.DNrecordPage 53DC.DN.VALVE.RDo records indicate pipeline system valves meet the requirements of 195.116? References: 195.116(a), 195.116(b), 195.116(c), 195.116(d), 195.116(e), 195.116(f)#

DC.DNobservationPage 53DC.DN.VALVE.ODo pipeline system valves meet the requirements of 195.116? References: 195.116(f), 195.116(b), 195.116(c), 195.116(e)#

DC.DNprocedurePage 53DC.DN.VALVECOMPAT.PDoes the process require that pipeline system valves meet the compatibility requirements of 195.116(c)? References: 195.116(c)#

DC.DNrecordPage 53DC.DN.VALVECOMPAT.RDo records indicate pipeline system valves meet the compatibility requirements of 195.116(c)? References: 195.116(c)#

DC.DNprocedurePage 53DC.DN.FITTING.PDoes the process require that selected material specifications for pipe fittings meet the requirements of 195.118? References: 195.118(a), 195.118(b), 195.118(c)#

DC.DNrecordPage 54DC.DN.FITTING.RDo records demonstrate selected material specifications for pipe fittings meet the requirements of 195.118? References: 195.118(a), 195.118(b), 195.118(c)#

DC.DNobservationPage 54DC.DN.FITTING.ODo the material specifications for selected pipe fittings meet the requirements of 195.118? References: 195.118(a), 195.118(b), 195.118(c)#

DC.DNprocedurePage 54DC.DN.ILIPASS.PDoes the process require the pipeline be designed and constructed to accommodate the passage of instrumented internal inspection devices? References: 195.202, 195.120(a), 195.120(b), 195.120(c), 195.120(d)#

DC.DNrecordPage 54DC.DN.ILIPASS.RDo records demonstrate the pipeline is designed and constructed to accommodate the passage of instrumented internal inspection devices? References: 195.266, 195.120(a), 195.120(b), 195.120(c), 195.120(d)#

DC.DNobservationPage 54DC.DN.ILIPASS.OIs the pipeline system constructed to accommodate the passage of instrumented internal inspection devices? References: 195.120(a), 195.120(b)#

DC.DNprocedurePage 54DC.DN.CLOSURE.PDoes the process require closures comply with the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section VIII, Pressure Vessels, Division 1 (2007) and have pressure and temperature ratings at least equal to those of the pipe to which the closure is attached? References: 195.124#

DC.DNrecordPage 54DC.DN.CLOSURE.RDo records indicate closures comply with the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section VIII, Pressure Vessels, Division 1 (2007) and they have pressure and temperature ratings at least equal to those of the pipe to which the closure is attached? References: 195.124#

DC.DNobservationPage 54DC.DN.CLOSURE.ODo closures comply with the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section VIII, Pressure Vessels, Division 1 (2007) and do they have pressure and temperature ratings at least equal to those of the pipe to which the closure is attached? References: 195.124#

DC.DNprocedurePage 54DC.DN.LDDESIGN.PAre newly constructed pipeline segments required to have a leak detection system that protects the public, property, and the environment? References: 195.134(a), 195.134(b), 195.134(c)#

DC.DNrecordPage 55DC.DN.LDDESIGN.RDo records indicate evaluation of the leak detection system for its capability to protect the public, property, and the environment? References: 195.134(a), 195.134(b), 195.134(c)#

DC.DNobservationPage 55DC.DN.LDDESIGN.ODoes the leak detection system perform to the system design requirements? References: 195.134(b), 195.134(c)#

DC.DNrecordPage 55DC.DN.CHEMCOMPATIBLE.RDo records verify determination that the product to be transported (hazardous liquids, CO2, biofuels) is chemically compatible with the pipeline, its components, and other commodities? References: 195.4#

DC.DNprocedurePage 55DC.DN.DESIGN.PDoes the process require certain Subpart C design requirements relating to biofuel transport be addressed? References: 195.100, 195.116(c), 195.126, 195.118(c)#

DC.DNrecordPage 55DC.DN.DESIGN.RDo records indicate that certain Subpart C design requirements relating to biofuel transport have been addressed? References: 195.100, 195.116(c), 195.126, 195.118(c)#

DC.DNrecordPage 55DC.DN.CONSTRUCT.RDo records indicate certain Subpart D construction requirements relating to biofuel transport have been addressed? References: 195.200, 195.260(c), 195.262(e)#

DC.DNprocedurePage 55DC.DN.METALLIC.PDoes the process require metallic components other than pipe to be qualified for use? References: 195.101(a), 195.101(b)#

DC.DNrecordPage 55DC.DN.METALLIC.RDo records indicate metallic components other than pipe have been qualified for use? References: 195.101(a), 195.101(b)#

DC.DNobservationPage 56DC.DN.METALLIC.ODo field observations verify metallic components other than pipe have been qualified for use? References: 195.101(a), 195.101(b)#

DC.DNrecordPage 56DC.DN.VALVEBIOFUELS.RDo records indicate pipeline system valves meet the compatibility requirements of 195.116(c)? References: 195.116(c)#

DC.DNprocedurePage 56DC.DN.TEMPDESIGN.PDoes the process require that pipeline system components subject to the design temperatures are made of materials that are suitable for those environmental temperatures? References: 195.102(a)#

DC.DNrecordPage 56DC.DN.TEMPDESIGN.RDo records indicate pipeline system components subject to low temperatures are made of materials that are suitable for those low temperatures? References: 195.102(a)#

DC.MOprocedurePage 56DC.MO.SAFETY.PDoes the process ensure that pipeline maintenance construction and testing activities are made in a safe manner and are made so as to prevent damage to persons and property? References: 195.402(a), 195.422(a), 195.402(c)(14)#

DC.MOobservationPage 56DC.MO.SAFETY.OAre pipeline maintenance construction and testing activities performed safely and in accordance with procedures to prevent damage to persons and property? References: 195.422(a), 195.402(c)(14)#

DC.MOprocedurePage 56DC.MO.ICEXAMINE.PDoes the process direct personnel to examine removed pipe for evidence of internal corrosion? References: 195.402(c), 195.579(c), 195.579(a)#

DC.MOrecordPage 56DC.MO.ICEXAMINE.RDo records indicate removed pipe examined for evidence of internal corrosion? References: 195.589(c), 195.579(c), 195.579(a)#

DC.MOobservationPage 57DC.MO.ICEXAMINE.OAre examinations of removed pipe for evidence of internal corrosion being conducted? References: 195.579(c)#

DC.MOprocedurePage 57DC.MO.MOPLIMIT.PDoes the process include procedures for starting up and shutting down any part of the pipeline system in a manner designed to assure operation within the limits prescribed by 195.406? References: 195.402(a), 195.402(c)(7)#

DC.MOrecordPage 57DC.MO.MOPLIMIT.RDo records indicate that pressure limitations on the pipeline are not exceeded? References: 195.402(c)(7)#

DC.MOobservationPage 57DC.MO.MOPLIMIT.OStart-Stop Procedures During startup or shut-in, does the operator assure that pressure limitations on the pipeline were not exceeded? References: 195.402(c)(7)#

DC.MOprocedurePage 57DC.MO.MOVE.PHas a process been developed for pipeline movements in accordance with 195.424? References: 195.402(a), 195.424(a), 195.424(b), 195.424(c)#

DC.MOobservationPage 57DC.MO.MOVE.ODoes the operator perform pipeline movements in accordance with 195.424? References: 195.424(a), 195.424(b), 195.424(c)#

DC.PTprocedurePage 57DC.PT.PRESSTEST.PDoes the process have adequate test procedures? References: 195.402(c), 195.302(a), 195.304, 195.305, 195.306, 195.310#

DC.PTrecordPage 57DC.PT.PRESSTEST.RAre pressure test records available and adequate? References: 195.310, 195.305(b)#

DC.PTobservationPage 58DC.PT.PRESSTEST.OIs pressure testing being adequately conducted? References: 195.302(a), 195.304, 195.305(a), 195.305(b), 195.306(a), 195.306(b), 195.306(c), 195.306(d), 195.307(a), 195.307(b), 195.307(c), 195.307(d), 195.307(e), 195.308#

DC.PTprocedurePage 58DC.PT.PRESSTESTTIEIN.PDoes the process require testing of pipe associated with tie-ins, either with the section to be tied in or separately? References: 195.402(c), 195.308#

DC.PTrecordPage 58DC.PT.PRESSTESTTIEIN.RDo records indicate pipe associated with tie-ins has been pressure tested? References: 195.308#

DC.RUprocedurePage 58DC.RU.REGRURALGATHER.PHave processes have been established for certain design and installation requirements? References: 195.11(d)(2), 195.11(b)(2), 195.11(b)(9), 195.11(b)(11)#

DC.RUrecordPage 58DC.RU.REGRURALGATHER.RDo records demonstrate design and installation requirements for selected regulated rural gathering lines being followed? References: 195.11(d)(2), 195.11(b)(2), 195.11(b)(9), 195.11(b)(11)#

DC.LSprocedurePage 58DC.LS.RURALLOWSTRESS.PAre processes established for design and installation requirements of Part 195 for rural low-stress pipelines? References: 195.12(c)(1), 195.12(c)(2), 195.12(c)(3)#

DC.LSrecordPage 58DC.LS.RURALLOWSTRESS.RDo records demonstrate compliance with design and installation requirements of Part 195 for selected rural low-stress pipelines? References: 195.12(c)(1), 195.12(c)(2), 195.12(c)(3)#

DC.SPrecordPage 59DC.SP.SP.RDo records indicate pipe replaced in accordance with the design and construction requirements of Part 195 and the conditions of the Special Permit? References: 190.341(d)(2)#

DC.TQprocedurePage 59DC.TQ.INSPECTORQUAL.PDoes the process require inspectors to be trained and qualified in the phase of construction to be inspected to ensure that the installation of pipe or pipeline systems is in accordance with Subpart D? References: 195.202, 195.204#

DC.TQrecordPage 59DC.TQ.INSPECTORQUAL.RDo records demonstrate that inspectors are trained and qualified in the phase of construction to be inspected to ensure that the installation of pipe or pipeline systems is in accordance with Subpart D? References: 195.204#

DC.TQobservationPage 59DC.TQ.INSPECTORQUAL.ODo observations support that inspectors are trained and qualified in the phase of construction to be inspected to ensure that the installation of pipe or pipeline systems is in accordance with Subpart D? References: 195.204#

DC.TQOQprocedurePage 59DC.TQOQ.OQPLAN.PDoes the process include covered tasks relating to "construction-type" maintenance? References: 195.505(a)#

DC.TQOQrecordPage 59DC.TQOQ.ABNORMAL.RDo records demonstrate that identified construction-type maintenance AOCs are adequate? References: 195.505(a)#

DC.TQOQrecordPage 60DC.TQOQ.OQCONTRACTOR.RAre qualification records for contractor personnel maintained? References: 195.505(b)#

DC.TQOQobservationPage 60DC.TQOQ.OQCONTRACTOR.ODo selected contractor individuals performing covered tasks demonstrate adequate skills and knowledge? References: 195.505(b)#

DC.TQOQrecordPage 60DC.TQOQ.RECORDS.RDoes the operator maintain qualification records for operator personnel? References: 195.505(b)#

DC.TQOQobservationPage 60DC.TQOQ.OQPLAN.ODo selected operator individuals performing covered tasks demonstrate adequate skills and knowledge? References: 195.505(b)#

DC.TQOQrecordPage 60DC.TQOQ.EXCAVATE.RWho Oversee Excavations and Backfilling Operations Do records demonstrate individuals who oversee marking, trenching and backfilling operations are qualified? References: 195.505(b)#

DC.TQOQobservationPage 60DC.TQOQ.EXCAVATE.OWho Oversee Excavations and Backfilling Operations Do selected individuals who oversee marking, trenching and backfilling operations demonstrate adequate skills and knowledge? References: 195.505(b), 195.5#

DC.CONVrecordPage 60DC.CONV.NOTIFICATION.RDo records indicate operator provided required notifications to PHMSA not later than 60 days before the conversion began as required by §195.64(c)? References: 195.64(c)(1)(i), 195.64(c)(1)(iii), 195.5(d), 195.49#

DC.CONVprocedurePage 60DC.CONV.CONVERSIONPROCED.PDid the operator prepare a comprehensive written Conversion to Service procedure that includes all of the requirements of §195.5? References: 195.5(a)#

DC.CONVrecordPage 61DC.CONV.INTEGRITYMGMT.RDo the records indicate the pipeline's Integrity Management history and related activities were reviewed? References: 195.5(a)(1)#

DC.CONVprocedurePage 61DC.CONV.PHYSICALDEFECTS.PDoes the conversion procedure include the requirement to visually inspect aboveground segments of the pipeline for physical defects and operating conditions which could be expected to impair the strength of the pipeline, as required by §195.5(a)(2)? References: 195.5(a)(2)#

DC.CONVrecordPage 61DC.CONV.PHYSICALDEFECTS.RDo the records indicate the aboveground segments of the pipeline was were visually inspected for physical defects and operating conditions which could be expected to impair the strength of the pipeline, as required by §195.5(a)(2)? References: 195.5(a)(2)#

DC.CONVprocedurePage 61DC.CONV.UNSAFEDEFECTS.PDoes the conversion procedure include requirement to identify and correct all known unsafe defects and conditions as required by §195.5(a)(3)? References: 195.5(a)(3)#

DC.CONVrecordPage 61DC.CONV.UNSAFEDEFECTS.RDo the records indicate operator corrected (or has plans to correct) all known unsafe defects and conditions as required by §195.5(a)(3) and conducted in accordance with Part 195? References: 195.5(a)(3)#

DC.CONVprocedurePage 61DC.CONV.RISKASSESSMENT.PDoes the conversion procedure require a Risk Assessment to be performed to identify threats and hazards associated with the conversion to the new service? References: 195.5(a)(1), 195.452, 195.454#

DC.CONVrecordPage 61DC.CONV.RISKASSESSMENT.RDo records demonstrate a Risk Assessment was performed to identify threats and hazards associated with the conversion to the new service and the measures taken/planned to mitigate reduce those risks? References: 195.5(a)(1), 195.452, 195.454#

DC.CONVrecordPage 61DC.CONV.DESIGN.RDo records indicate the Conversion-to-Service DESIGN elements were reviewed and applied in accordance with 195.5(a)? References: 195.5(a)(1)#

DC.CONVrecordPage 61DC.CONV.CONSTRUCTION.RDo the records indicate the Conversion-to-Service related CONSTRUCTION elements were reviewed in accordance with §195.5(a) and applied in accordance with Part 195? References: 195.5(a)(1)#

DC.CONVrecordPage 62DC.CONV.OPSMAINTENANCE.RDo the records indicate the Conversion-to-Service related Operations & Maintenance elements were reviewed in accordance with §195.5(a) and applied in accordance with Part 195? References: 195.5(a)(1), 195.402#

DC.CONVprocedurePage 62DC.CONV.OPSMAINTMODIF.PDoes the Conversion procedure require the Operations and Maintenance Manual procedures to be reviewed, and modified or expanded as necessary to accommodate the Part 195 requirements as applied to this Conversion to Service? References: 195.402, 195.5(a)#

DC.CONVrecordPage 62DC.CONV.OPSMAINTMODIF.RDo the records indicate the Conversion-to-Service related Operations & Maintenance elements were reviewed and the necessary modifications were made in accordance with §195.5(a)? References: 195.402, 195.5(a)#

DC.CONVrecordPage 62DC.CONV.MISSINGRECORDS.RHistorical Records Review - Missing Records For the operator's review of the pipeline history (historical records) as required by §195.5(a), do records indicate operator determined what necessary records were either missing or deemed not sufficient and how the operator plans to test to obtain the missing records or insufficient data? References: 195.5(a)(1)#

DC.CONVprocedurePage 62DC.CONV.PRESSURETESTING.PDoes the conversion procedure include the requirement to pressure test the pipeline, in accordance with Part 195, Subpart E, to substantiate the MOP permitted by §195.406? References: 195.5(a)(4), 195.406#